An observational study in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Qualitative Research, sponsored by Kafrelsheikh University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-13.
Sponsored by Kafrelsheikh University · Observational
This study aims to explore the effect of AI use on different aspects of writing qualitative research papers by physical therapy students. By examining how AI tools influence various elements of the writing process, such as structure, clarity, knowledge presentation, and critical thinking, this research aims to provide insights into the benefits and potential drawbacks of AI integration in academic assignments. By recognizing the significance of this research, contribute to understanding how AI can be effectively utilized to enhance the educational experience and improve the writing skills of physical therapy students.
This study aims to explore the effect of AI use on different aspects of writing qualitative research papers by physical therapy students. By examining how AI tools influence various elements of the writing process, such as structure, clarity, knowledge presentation, and critical thinking, this research aims to provide insights into the benefits and potential drawbacks of AI integration in academic assignments. By recognizing the significance of this research, contribute to understanding how AI can be effectively utilized to enhance the educational experience and improve the writing skills of physical therapy students.
This study explores how AI can enhance academic writing and analysis in physical therapy education, focusing on how AI tools may support researchers in qualitative work.
This project is significant as it addresses several key benefits and challenges of AI integration in academic writing for qualitative research within physical therapy education:
Kafrelsheikh University is the lead sponsor of 291 studies on the registry; 112 are open to participants now.
Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
kafrelsheikh university students
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
percentage of AI-generated content within the text of each assignment.
Time frame: During the procedure
Incidence of Structure & Organization (SO) by Sapling AI detector website
This criterion evaluates the overall layout and logical flow of the research paper. It includes the clarity of the introduction, body, and conclusion, as well as the coherence of arguments and the seamless transition between sections. A well-structured paper should have a clear beginning, middle, and end, with each part contributing to the overall argument or narrative.
Time frame: During the procedure
Rate Writing Clarity (WC) by Sapling AI detector website
Writing Clarity assesses the ease with which the reader can understand the text. This includes the use of clear and precise language, the absence of grammatical and typographical errors, and the appropriateness of sentence structure and word choice. A paper with high writing clarity will be easily comprehensible and free from ambiguity
Time frame: During the procedure
Rate of Knowledge (Know) by Sapling AI detector website
This criterion measures the depth and breadth of the student's understanding of the subject matter. It includes the accurate representation of key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the topic. A high score indicates that the student has demonstrated a thorough and nuanced understanding of the subject.
Time frame: During the procedure
Plan to share: Undecided — Data will be shared upon reasonable request from the principal investigator.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Dec 2024; primary completion for Jan 2025, 1 month later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.