ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06730685PHILUCAUpdated Feb 12, 2026

Sarcopenia and Cachexia in Patients With Lung Cancer

An observational study in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC), sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The PHILICA study investigates whether muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function are associated with treatment tolerance, quality of life and survival in patients with lung cancer. It also aims to explore why some patients face challenges in completing their treatment. The findings may contribute to improved strategies for supporting patients and developing more precise and individualized treatment plans in the future.

Read the detailed description

The PHILUCA prospective cohort study investigates the relationship between sarcopenia, cachexia, and change in muscle parameters with both treatment tolerance, quality of life and survival in patients with lung cancer receiving systemic treatment(s) (n=160). It aims to identify factors associated with difficulties in completing oncological treatment and to elucidate patterns that may inform improved patient support and individualized treatment planning. The study involves non-invasive physical assessments, patient-reported questionnaires, and the analysis of routinely collected medical data.

Assessments of muscle mass, muscle strength, muscle function, and quality of life are conducted at key time points, including at diagnosis and after three months into treatment or until the first control scan. Physical tests are performed during routine hospital visits, requiring no additional appointments. Body composition analysis is performed using Bioelectrical impedance analysis and by Computed Tomography scans obtained as part of standard care, without additional imaging procedures.

All participants receive standard lung cancer treatment, which may include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or combinations thereof, based on disease type and stage. The study does not interfere with or modify standard care protocols. Participants unwilling or unable to fully participate may still contribute by completing a baseline questionnaire and consenting to the use of medical record data.

The study seeks to advance the understanding of how muscle-related parameters influence cancer treatment outcomes. The findings are anticipated to inform strategies for optimizing treatment tolerance, improving patient outcomes, and tailoring supportive care interventions for individuals with lung cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Keywords

  • Sarcopenia
  • Cachexia
  • Treatment-tolerance
  • Survival
  • Quality of Life
  • Lung cancer
  • Muscle function
  • Muscle strength
  • Muscle mass
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

7,620 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,838 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is close to the median of 160 across 1,148 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

Zealand University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 236 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have been diagnosed and treated at Zealand University Hospital, Naestved Hospital

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • Diagnosed with lung cancer (all types and stages) and scheduled for oncological treatment
  • More than 3 months expected survival

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Competing cancer
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe physical or cognitive disabilities preventing physical testing and informend consent
  • Not able to read and understand Danish
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overvall survival

    Death from all causes

    Time frame: 12 months from inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)

    DLT defined as switching treatment; treatment delay (≥3 days from initially planned); treatment de-escalation (dose reduction ≥15% of platinum agent); early treatment termination; and hospitalization ≥1 day, all due to chemotherapy-induced side effects.

    Time frame: 6 months from inclusion

  2. Haematological toxicities

    Anaemia; Leukocytopenia; Neutropenia; Thrombocytopenia. Graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 5.0

    Time frame: 6 months from inclusion

  3. Change in muscle mass

    Measured at the 3rd lumbar vertebrae. Routine CT-scans (from baseline CT to last performed CT)

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

  4. Change in muscle function

    10 meter habitual and maximal gait speed (m/s)

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

  5. Change in muscle function

    30-second sit to stand (5 x times sit to stand measured concurrently)

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

  6. Change in muscle strength

    Maximal isometric handgrip strength by dynamometry

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

  7. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Measured by the EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

  8. Disease-specific symptoms

    Measured by the EORTC lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss,neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    Time frame: Assessments are intended to be performed around 3 months after inclusion, which in routine clinical practice usually corresponds to the time point immediately before the first control scan.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sayer AA, Cooper R, Arai H, Cawthon PM, Ntsama Essomba MJ, Fielding RA, Grounds MD, Witham MD, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Sarcopenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Sep 19;10(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00550-w. PubMed 39300120 ↗
  • Dalton SO, Steding-Jessen M, Jakobsen E, Mellemgaard A, Osterlind K, Schuz J, Johansen C. Socioeconomic position and survival after lung cancer: Influence of stage, treatment and comorbidity among Danish patients with lung cancer diagnosed in 2004-2010. Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):797-804. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.1001037. Epub 2015 Mar 12. PubMed 25761702 ↗
  • Buentzel J, Heinz J, Bleckmann A, Bauer C, Rover C, Bohnenberger H, Saha S, Hinterthaner M, Baraki H, Kutschka I, Emmert A. Sarcopenia as Prognostic Factor in Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2019 Sep;39(9):4603-4612. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13640. PubMed 31519557 ↗
  • Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4. PubMed 21296615 ↗
  • Srdic D, Plestina S, Sverko-Peternac A, Nikolac N, Simundic AM, Samarzija M. Cancer cachexia, sarcopenia and biochemical markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer-chemotherapy toxicity and prognostic value. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3287-y. Epub 2016 May 28. PubMed 27236439 ↗
  • Sjoblom B, Gronberg BH, Benth JS, Baracos VE, Flotten O, Hjermstad MJ, Aass N, Jordhoy M. Low muscle mass is associated with chemotherapy-induced haematological toxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015 Oct;90(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 9. PubMed 26198373 ↗
  • de Jong C, Chargi N, Herder GJM, van Haarlem SWA, van der Meer F, van Lindert ASR, Ten Heuvel A, Brouwer J, de Jong PA, Devriese LA, Huitema ADR, Egberts TCG, de Bree R, Deneer VHM. The association between skeletal muscle measures and chemotherapy-induced toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Jun;13(3):1554-1564. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12967. Epub 2022 Mar 18. PubMed 35301821 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — For statistical analyses all data will be transferred to the Danish Cancer Institute

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning when data collection are finalized and ending 5 years after the publication of results

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06730685
Responsible party
Susanne Dalton (Professor, MD, PhD, Zealand University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
Start date
Dec 12, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Professor
principal investigator · Zealand University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion