ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06722209Updated Feb 26, 2025

Different Same-day Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation Procedures on Patient Compliance, Tolerability, and Bowel Cleansing

An interventional study of polyethylene glycol (Protocol I) in Colonoscopy, Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures and Colonoscopy Preparation, sponsored by Eastern Mediterranean University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-26.

Sponsored by Eastern Mediterranean University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different bowel preparation protocols applied on the same day on patients' compliance, tolerance and bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

Hypotheses of the Study : Same-day administration of bowel preparation before colonoscopy; H1.1: There is a significant difference between the bowel preparation protocol with polyethylene glycol (Protocol I) and the protocol with sodium phosphate (Protocol II) in bowel preparation score scores H1.2: There is a significant difference between the compliance levels of the patients who underwent a bowel preparation protocol containing polyethylene glycol (Protocol I) and a protocol containing sodium phosphate (Protocol II) H1.3: There is a significant difference between the tolerance of the patients who underwent a bowel preparation protocol containing polyethylene glycol (Protocol I) and a protocol containing sodium phosphate (Protocol II)

In patients in Protocol I and II groups, data will be collected one day before the procedure with the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the procedure will be explained face to face. After the procedure, bowel preparation score during colonoscopy and compliance and tolerance to the bowel preparation protocol will be evaluated from the patients in both groups.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different bowel preparation protocols applied on the same day on patients' compliance, tolerance and bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

This study will be conducted as a single centre prospective randomised controlled trial in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study will be conducted in a private clinic in Famagusta region in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Patients undergoing colonoscopy will be given written material about bowel preparation the day before the procedure and the protocol will be explained verbally and in writing. The bowel preparation protocol is described below.

Protocol I 06.30 Breakfast 09.00 hours: Phospho-Soda 45 ml 10.00: Phospho-Soda 45 ml At least 3 litres of liguid fluid intake until 14.00 14.30- 15.00: Colonoscopy Protocol II 06.30 Breakfast 09.00 :Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) will be diluted with 4 litres of water and one glass (200ml) will be drunk every 10 minutes until it is finished (It will be finished in about 4 hours) Colonoscopy after 2 hours Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Drinking at least 75 per cent of the solution
  • Have the ability to read and understand research instructions
  • Patients who agreed to participate in the study Sampling exclusion criteria
  • Patients with active lower intestinal bleeding Patients diagnosed with CHF, liver failure, end-stage acute renal failure

A total of 118 patients were planned to be included in the study with an effect size of d=0.50, α =0.05 margin of error, 85% power, and 59 patients in each group. Considering the possibility of missing data, the sample number was increased by 10% and it was decided to take 128 patients by taking 64 patients in the groups in total.

The patients will be assigned to the experimental and control groups according to the list to be created using the randomisation program at a ratio of 1.1(https://www.random.org/). Randomisation and assignment to groups will be done by an independent researcher who is not involved in the implementation phase of the research. Thus, selection bias will be prevented in the randomization process.

In patients in Protocol I and II groups, data will be collected one day before the procedure with the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the procedure will be explained face to face. After the procedure, the bowel preparation score during colonoscopy and compliance and tolerance to the bowel preparation protocol will be evaluated from the patients in both groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
  • Colonoscopy Preparation
  • Colonoscopy Preparation Outcome

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Bowel preparation
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Patients compliance
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,734 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 128 is above the median of 77 across 4,222 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Eastern Mediterranean University is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Drinking at least 75 per cent of the solution
  • Have the ability to read and understand research instructions
  • Patients who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active lower intestinal bleeding
  • KKY
  • Liver failure,
  • Patients with end-stage acute renal failure
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Experimental: Intervention group

    Intestinal preparation protocol with polyethylene glycol (Protocol I)

    Other: polyethylene glycol (Protocol I)

  • Other
    Control group

    Intestinal preparation protocol with with sodium phosphate content (protocol II)

    Other: polyethylene glycol (Protocol I)

Interventions

  • Otherpolyethylene glycol (Protocol I)

    Intestinal preparation protocol with polyethylene glycol (Protocol I)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compliance and Tolerance to the Bowel Preparation Protocol

    The Bowel Preparation Protocol Compliance and Tolerance Assessment Form will assess this primary outcome. This form assesses tolerance to the bowel preparation protocol; abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, Abdominal distension -gas,thirst , headache, weakness and fatigue and intolerance to the solution. The rate of patients experiencing variables including Compliance and Tolerance to the Bowel Preparation Protocol will be calculated.

    Time frame: The patients were interviewed 30-60 dk minutes after the procedure was completed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bowel cleansing quality level

    The effect of the bowel preparation protocol on bowel readiness will be assessed using the Boston Bowel Readiness Classification. Boston Classification of Bowel Preparation (BBPS) scores bowel cleanliness between 0 and 3 points. According to BBPS, 3 segments of the colon (left, transverse, right) are scored according to the degree of cleanliness. According to BBPS, a score of 0 indicates inadequate cleanliness and a score of 9 indicates perfect cleanliness. As the cleanliness score progresses from zero to nine, it is assessed that bowel cleanliness is approaching perfection.

    Time frame: BBPS will be assessed by the surgeon during colonoscopy.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Theunissen F, Lantinga MA, Ter Borg PCJ, Ouwendijk RJT, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ; Trans. IT foundation study group. Efficacy of different bowel preparation regimen volumes for colorectal cancer screening and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Jun;11(5):448-457. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12386. Epub 2023 May 15. PubMed 37190897 ↗

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Nov 2025, 8 months later.

Of 801 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 845 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2024
First posted
Dec 9, 2024
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 10, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 10, 2025
Last update
Feb 26, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06722209
Responsible party
Gülten Sucu Dağ (Assoc Prof, Eastern Mediterranean University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 9, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 26, 2025

Study contacts

GULTEN SUCU DAĞ, Assoc Prof Dr
Contact
gulten.dag@emu.edu.tr
+905338564904

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion