ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06721260METRICSUpdated Mar 20, 2026

Metabolism Evaluation Through Resting Indirect Calorimetry in Bladder Cancer (METRICS)

An observational study in Bladder Cancer, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to learn more about energy needs and muscle function during treatment for bladder cancer. These insights can help improve future patient care. The study team found in a previous study that resting energy can be different than what estimates show. Patients with bladder cancer are known to suffer a decline in physical resilience over time. Monitoring patients to understand these changes better could help design future treatments with these vulnerabilities in mind.

Read the detailed description

The investigators' long-term goal is to improve cachexia treatment for patients with cancer. The project is significant because identifying cachexia earlier in its onset allows for earlier and more successful treatment. Major barriers to early detection and treatment are: 1) clear specific lab tests to confirm the diagnosis and 2) identifying when resting energy expenditure (REE) increases. It is the investigators' expectation that at the completion of these descriptive studies, key factors will be identified to guide earlier detection and treatment of cachexia. Platinum-based chemotherapy and surgery are a dual-phase treatment regimen to treat bladder cancer that has a high risk of worsening cachexia compared to other cancer types not requiring such an intensive treatment regimen. Inhibition of Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a promising preventive strategy against cachexia in patients with bladder cancer. Understanding GDF-15 and REE changes over the course of treatment could inform proactive rather than reactive strategies to support the health of these patients and translate to patients with other types of cancer. The objective of this application is to assess changes in GDF-15 and REE levels during the treatment course for advanced bladder cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • resting energy expenditure
  • cachexia
  • growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15)
  • Nutrition status
  • radical cystectomy
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • body composition
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 445 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 200 across 410 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 492 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Potential patients will be scheduled for treatment (chemotherapy and radical cystectomy) for bladder cancer at the University of Kansas Health System.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed cancer diagnosis
  • Scheduled for platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy
  • Adequate renal and cardiac function for platinum-based chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for bladder cancer
  • Severe cardiac, renal, hepatic, respiratory or metabolic diseases
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Uncontrolled conditions that could affect study outcomes
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) changes across key treatment milestones.

    Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) will be measured using indirect calorimetry before and after chemotherapy and radical cystectomy and will be associated with clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood biomarkers

    Blood will be collected at study visits and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) concentration will be evaluated.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  2. Inflammation marker

    Blood will be collected at study visits and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration will be evaluated.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  3. Immune inflammation marker

    Blood will be collected at study visits and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) concentration will be evaluated.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  4. Body composition

    Changes in muscle and fat mass will be assessed using dual-energy X-ray (DXA) at study visits.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  5. Nutrition assessment

    The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and 24-hour dietary recalls will be administered in an interview format by trained study personnel. These will take place at study visits.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  6. Grip strength measurement

    A hand dynamometer will be used to measure grip strength at study visits.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  7. Quality of Life (QOL) and Fatigue assessment

    FACIT-Fatigue questionnaires will be administered to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at study visits.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

  8. Quality of Life (QOL) during bladder cancer treatment assessment

    FACT-Bl-Cys questionnaires will be administered to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at study visits.

    Time frame: From enrollment, prior to chemotherapy, to 3 weeks after radical cystectomy.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
    Recruiting
    • Misty Bechtel · Contactmbechtel@kumc.edu · 913-945-7519
    • Jill Hamilton-Reeves, PhD · Principal investigator
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
    Recruiting
    • Misty Bechtel · Contact
    • Jill Hamilton-Reeves · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 167 non-industry observational studies under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 202 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 26, 2024
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
StartActual
Jan 21, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Mar 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06721260
Responsible party
Jill Hamilton-Reeves, PhD RD LD (Professor, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
Start date
Jan 21, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Jill M. Hamilton-Reeves, PhD, RD, CSO
Contact
jhamilton-reeves@kumc.edu
913-588-7650
Misty D Bechtel, BA, CCRP
Contact
mbechtel2@kumc.edu
913-945-5037
Jill M Hamilton-Reeves, PhD, RD, CSO
principal investigator · University of Kansas Medical Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion