ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06715384CAMUpdated Feb 19, 2025

Evaluation of a CAM System for Colorectal Polyp Size Measurement

An interventional study of Polyp size measurement using autonomous AI measurement or AI-assisted human measurement with the CAM system in Colorectal Polyp and Colorectal Adenoma, sponsored by Changhai Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.

Sponsored by Changhai Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Accurate polyp size measurements are essential for risk stratification, selection of polypectomy techniques, and surveillance interval assignments. Evidence indicated that the clinical implementation of artificial intelligence is an optimal tool to improve the measurement of polyps during colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided measuring (CAM) system (EndoDASS) and compare its accuracy with routine sizing methods during real-time colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted in 2 phases: the first phase will evaluate the value of the application of the computer-aided measuring (CAM) system for polyp size measurement accuracy in a small sample of clinical videos, recording the corresponding clinical videos for CAM measurements after measuring polyp size using real-time visual assessment and non-scaled device (open biopsy forceps or snare) assessment, and comparing the different methods of polyp size measurement through a video-based analysis [Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) measurement, AI-assisted human measurement, non-scaled device assessment, and visual assessment] with different groups of endoscopists ( experts, gastroenterologists, surgeons, fellows) evaluating the corresponding clinical videos during real-time measurements, to obtain pilot data on the relative accuracy of polyp size measurement when using the CAM system, to test the feasibility of size measurement of freshly resected polyp specimens and to determine the sample size and reference for evaluating the CAM system in the subsequent phases of a randomized controlled trial of the study. The second phase will assess the value of using the AI-assisted human measurement versus the non-scaled device assessment for polyp size measurement accuracy in a clinical randomized controlled trial using a prospective, multicenter, patient-single-blind, randomized controlled trial design in which subjects are randomly assigned to the CAM group and the non-scaled device measurement group in a 1:1 ratio. Each patient will have a maximum of 3 polyps included in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Polyp
  • Colorectal Adenoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Polyp Size
  • Deep Learning
  • Colonoscopy
  • Depth Map
03

In context

Polyps

312 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyps; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 168 is above the median of 150 across 204 interventional studies indexed under Polyps.

Browse Polyps studies →

Lead sponsor

Changhai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 355 studies on the registry; 137 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 18-75, any gender; 76-85 years eligible case-by-case based on health status.
  2. Colonoscopy screening, surveillance, or diagnostic participants.
  3. obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anticoagulant use (e.g., aspirin, warfarin) within 7 days prior to colonoscopy or coagulopathy.
  2. Inflammatory bowel disease.
  3. Aronchick score >3 at entry.
  4. Incomplete Case Report Form (CRF) data.
  5. Emergency colonoscopy.
  6. Pregnancy or lactation.
  7. Gastrointestinal obstruction.
  8. Refusal to participate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
168 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Polyp size measurement with Artificial intelligence (AI)

    Colonoscopies will be performed according to the standard of care. Patients will have colonoscopies performed using the computer-aided measuring (CAM) system. All measured fresh polyp specimens will be immediately sized in vitro as the ground truth.

    Diagnostic Test: Polyp size measurement using autonomous AI measurement or AI-assisted human measurement with the CAM system

  • No intervention
    Polyp size measurement without AI

    Colonoscopies will be performed according to the standard of care without the CAM system. Patients will undergo a standard colonoscopy. Polyp size measurement will be assessed visually and non-scaled device (open biopsy forceps or snare). All measured fresh polyp specimens will be immediately sized in vitro as the ground truth.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPolyp size measurement using autonomous AI measurement or AI-assisted human measurement with the CAM system

    The study of real-time polyp size measurement using the CAM system will be conducted in two phases. Phase I (pilot phase, n=24 polyps, about 27 patients) will be used to assess the feasibility of applying the CAM system in real-time in a clinical video in order to obtain pilot data on the relative accuracy of assessing polyp sizes using autonomous AI measurement and AI-assisted human measurement and to determine the relative accuracy of assessing polyp size in Phase II of the study ( Randomized Controlled Trial) to assess the sample size and reference standards for the CAM system. The sample size for the second phase of the randomized controlled trial (comparing AI-assisted human measurement to non-scaled device) will be based on pilot data in order to compare the relative accuracy of polyp size measurement with AI-assisted human measurement versus non-scaled device in clinical practice.

    Also known as: Polyp size measurement with the CAM system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the computer-aided measuring (CAM) system

    To evaluate the relative accuracies of the computer-aided measuring (CAM) system measurement (Autonomous AI measurement and AI-assisted human measurement), non-scaled device (open biopsy forceps or snare) assessment or visual assessment for measuring polyp size compared to with measurement of freshly resected polyp specimens by a digital vernier caliper as reference standard. Relative accuracy is defined as "\[1-(CAM system measurement - ground truth measurement)/ground truth measurement\] x100%". Scale: 0-100. Higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. video-based analysis

    Compare in video-based analysis with different endoscopists (experts, gastroenterologists, surgeons, fellows) the relative size measurements accuracy of CAM system measurement with visual and non-scaled device assessment. Relative accuracy is defined as "\[1-(CAM system measurement ground truth measurement)/ground truth measurement\] x100%". Scale: 0-100. Higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Reliability between CAM system measurement and ground truth measurement

    Reliability between CAM system measurement, non-scaled device assessment, visual assessment and ground truth measurement is evaluate by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). CCC is a statistical measure used to evaluate the agreement between two continuous variables.The CCC considers both the correlation and the bias between the two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1;1: Perfect agreement. 0: No agreement. Negative values: Indicate that the variables diverge.

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Time taken for polyp size measurement

    Measurement time of the AI-assisted human measurement, non-scaled device assessment, and visual estimation refers to the time taken by endoscopists using various measurement methods, starting from when a polyp appears in the field of view for measurement until the report of the polyp size is completed.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Percentage differences between the AI-assisted human measurement and non-scaled device assessment

    Calculate percentage differences between the AI-assisted human measurement and non-scaled device assessment.

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Instances of overestimation or underestimation by the AI-assisted human measurement and non-scaled device assessment

    Evaluate the instances of overestimation or underestimation by the AI-assisted human measurement and non-scaled device assessment.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17. PubMed 38230766 ↗
  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Wang J, Chen X, Wu L, et al. An artificial intelligence-based system for measuring the size of gastrointestinal lesions under endoscopy (with video). Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy. 2022;39(12):965-971.
  • Wu Y, Shih FY, Wang C, et al. The Deep Hybrid Neural Network and an Application on Polyp Detection. Intern J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell. 2024;38(04).
  • Wang J, Li Y, Chen B, Cheng D, Liao F, Tan T, Xu Q, Liu Z, Huang Y, Zhu C, Cao W, Yao L, Wu Z, Wu L, Zhang C, Xiao B, Xu M, Liu J, Li S, Yu H. A real-time deep learning-based system for colorectal polyp size estimation by white-light endoscopy: development and multicenter prospective validation. Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):260-270. doi: 10.1055/a-2189-7036. Epub 2023 Oct 12. PubMed 37827513 ↗
  • Abdelrahim M, Saiga H, Maeda N, Hossain E, Ikeda H, Bhandari P. Automated sizing of colorectal polyps using computer vision. Gut. 2022 Jan;71(1):7-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324510. Epub 2021 Jul 15. No abstract available. PubMed 34266967 ↗
  • Djinbachian R, Haumesser C, Taghiakbari M, Pohl H, Barkun A, Sidani S, Liu Chen Kiow J, Panzini B, Bouchard S, Deslandres E, Alj A, von Renteln D. Autonomous Artificial Intelligence vs Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Human Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):392-399.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.044. Epub 2024 Feb 7. PubMed 38331204 ↗
  • Liu Y, Zuo S. Self-supervised monocular depth estimation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Aug;238:107619. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107619. Epub 2023 May 19. PubMed 37235969 ↗
  • Su R, Liu J, Wu B, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Wan M, Tian Z, Hu Y. Accurate measurement of colorectal polyps using computer-aided analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May 1;33(5):701-708. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002162. PubMed 33787542 ↗
  • Zuo W, Dai Y, Huang X, Peng RQ, Li X, Liu H. Evaluation of the competence of an artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system in clinical practice: A post hoc analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 6;10:1158574. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1158574. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37089592 ↗
  • Sudarevic B, Sodmann P, Kafetzis I, Troya J, Lux TJ, Sassmannshausen Z, Herlod K, Schmidt SA, Brand M, Schottker K, Zoller WG, Meining A, Hann A. Artificial intelligence-based polyp size measurement in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the auxiliary waterjet as a reference. Endoscopy. 2023 Sep;55(9):871-876. doi: 10.1055/a-2077-7398. Epub 2023 Apr 20. PubMed 37080235 ↗
  • Kwak MS, Cha JM, Jeon JW, Yoon JY, Park JW. Artificial intelligence-based measurement outperforms current methods for colorectal polyp size measurement. Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1188-1195. doi: 10.1111/den.14318. Epub 2022 May 19. PubMed 35385184 ↗
  • Plumb AA, Nickerson C, Wooldrage K, Bassett P, Taylor SA, Altman D, Atkin W, Halligan S. Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology. Endoscopy. 2016 Oct;48(10):899-908. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108727. Epub 2016 Jul 21. PubMed 27441685 ↗
  • Ahmad I, Levine JB, Anderson JC. Endoscopic Measurement of Colorectal Polyps: How Do We Measure Up? Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):769-71. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 25. No abstract available. PubMed 26820916 ↗
  • Eichenseer PJ, Dhanekula R, Jakate S, Mobarhan S, Melson JE. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):315-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dd138. PubMed 23392145 ↗
  • Taylor JL, Coleman HG, Gray RT, Kelly PJ, Cameron RI, O'Neill CJ, Shah RM, Owen TA, Dickey W, Loughrey MB. A comparison of endoscopy versus pathology sizing of colorectal adenomas and potential implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):341-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 19. PubMed 27102832 ↗
  • Anderson BW, Smyrk TC, Anderson KS, Mahoney DW, Devens ME, Sweetser SR, Kisiel JB, Ahlquist DA. Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.058. Epub 2015 Aug 28. PubMed 26318830 ↗
  • Taghiakbari M, Djinbachian R, Haumesser C, Sidani S, Chen Kiow JL, Panzini B, von Renteln D. Measuring Size of Colorectal Polyps Using a Virtual Scale Endoscope or Visual Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;119(7):1309-1317. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002623. Epub 2023 Dec 12. PubMed 38084850 ↗
  • Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, Haumesser C, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Khalil MA, Sidani S, Liu J, Panzini B, von Renteln D. Comparing size measurement of colorectal polyps using a novel virtual scale endoscope, endoscopic ruler or forceps: A preclinical randomized trial. Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jan 30;11(1):E128-E135. doi: 10.1055/a-2005-7548. eCollection 2023 Jan. PubMed 36726860 ↗
  • von Renteln D, Djinbachian R, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Taghiakbari M. Measuring size of smaller colorectal polyps using a virtual scale function during endoscopies. Gut. 2023 Mar;72(3):417-420. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328654. Epub 2022 Nov 21. No abstract available. PubMed 36411028 ↗
  • Visentini-Scarzanella M, Kawasaki H, Furukawa R, Bonino MA, Arolfo S, Lo Secco G, Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Dario P, Ciuti G. A structured light laser probe for gastrointestinal polyp size measurement: a preliminary comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2018 May;6(5):E602-E609. doi: 10.1055/a-0577-2798. Epub 2018 May 8. PubMed 29756018 ↗
  • Kaz AM, Anwar A, O'Neill DR, Dominitz JA. Use of a novel polyp "ruler snare" improves estimation of colon polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr;83(4):812-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.082. Epub 2015 Sep 14. PubMed 26382052 ↗
  • Hyun YS, Han DS, Bae JH, Park HS, Eun CS. Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 May;43(5):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Feb 21. PubMed 21334993 ↗
  • Kume K, Watanabe T, Yoshikawa I, Harada M. Endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:714294. doi: 10.1155/2014/714294. Epub 2014 Jun 30. PubMed 25093021 ↗
  • Mir FA, Boumitri C, Ashraf I, Matteson-Kome ML, Nguyen DL, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(6):640-648. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0180. Epub 2017 Jul 24. PubMed 29118558 ↗
  • Leng Q, Jin HY. Measurement system that improves the accuracy of polyp size determined at colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2178-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2178. PubMed 25717254 ↗
  • Jin HY, Leng Q. Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):623-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.623. PubMed 25605986 ↗
  • Rex DK, Rabinovitz R. Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 8. PubMed 24119506 ↗
  • Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM, Regula J, Bretthauer M, Chaussade S, Dekker E, Ferlitsch M, Gimeno-Garcia A, Jover R, Kalager M, Pellise M, Pox C, Ricciardiello L, Rutter M, Helsingen LM, Bleijenberg A, Senore C, van Hooft JE, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Quintero E. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020 Aug;52(8):687-700. doi: 10.1055/a-1185-3109. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PubMed 32572858 ↗
  • Zessner-Spitzenberg J, Waldmann E, Rockenbauer LM, Demschik A, Penz D, Trauner M, Ferlitsch M. Polyp size is associated with colorectal cancer death across histologic polyp subtypes: a retrospective study of a screening colonoscopy registry. Endoscopy. 2024 Nov;56(11):820-827. doi: 10.1055/a-2339-0146. Epub 2024 Jun 27. PubMed 38936414 ↗
  • Wang Y, Huang Y, Chase RC, Li T, Ramai D, Li S, Huang X, Antwi SO, Keaveny AP, Pang M. Global Burden of Digestive Diseases: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases Study, 1990 to 2019. Gastroenterology. 2023 Sep;165(3):773-783.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.050. Epub 2023 Jun 9. PubMed 37302558 ↗
  • Mori Y. New horizons in polyp size estimation. Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):271-272. doi: 10.1055/a-2224-0756. Epub 2024 Jan 12. No abstract available. PubMed 38216131 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD data can be shared with investigators who propose to use the data under the approval of an independent review committee. Data can only be used for the goals specified in the proposal. Data sharing will be implemented between 6-18 months after article publication with a data-sharing agreement signed. Yu Bai can be contacted at the corresponding email.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2025, 3 months after the start.

Of 68 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Polyps, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 79 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 26, 2024
First posted
Dec 4, 2024
StartActual
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06715384
Lead sponsor
Changhai Hospital
Responsible party
Zhaoshen Li (Director of Gastroenterology Dept and Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2024
Start date
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2025

Study contacts

Cheng-Long Wang, MD
Contact
sunshinewangcl@126.com
+86-18257806772
Xiang-Yu Sui, MD
Contact
sui.xiangyu@hotmail.com
+86-19916549745
Sheng-Bing Zhao, MD
principal investigator · Department of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yu Bai, MD
study director · Department of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
En-Da Yu, MBBS
study director · Department of Colorectal Surgery and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhao-Shen Li, MD, PhD
study chair · Department of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion