ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06708351Updated Sep 17, 2026

Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Women Living With HIV in Kenya, the ENHANCE LINKAge Trial

An interventional study of Best Practice and Health Promotion and Education in HIV Infection, Human Papillomavirus-Related Cervical Carcinoma and Screening Strategy, sponsored by Emory University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Kenya. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Background In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV create a dual burden of disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality in the form of cervical cancer (CC). Women living with HIV (WLWH) have a six-fold higher risk of developing precancerous lesions that persist and progress to CC, which is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women in Kenya. Significant support from the Go Further campaign, represented by donors such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the George W. Bush Institute, UNAIDS, Merck, and Roche, to integrate CC screening into HIV clinics represents an exceptional opportunity to scale CC impact across SSA, but only if implementation science evidence is available to inform strategy. Currently, the impact of Go Further has been undermined by fractured linkages to care and insensitive screening methods; in Kenya, less than 2% of WLWH screened have received appropriate treatment. Implementation science studies are needed to better understand and surmount barriers to integrated care in publicly funded HIV clinics.

Broad objective This study seeks to explore and innovate strategies to overcome patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers to implementing CC screening and referral guidelines, link WLWH who require further diagnostic testing and/or treatment with effective and accessible care, and document services for accountability and quality improvement. In this proposal, our team will apply our extensive implementation science expertise and partnerships with Kenya Ministry of Health (MOH) to adapt and test evidence-based strategies (e.g., HPV self-testing, care navigators, and the WEMA mHealth app [tested and scaled in Tanzania]) that address key multi-level barriers identified through a formative, stakeholder-engaged research phase.

Methodology Using the EPIS framework to guide our project, we will: Aim 1a), Explore (engage a multi-disciplinary stakeholder advisory board to co-design the intervention package and prioritize implementation strategies that align with local capacity, opportunities, and motivations; Aim 1b), Prepare (develop tools and strengthen capacity at clinics to implement the strategies; Aim 2), Implement and evaluate the package of implementation strategies via a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial in 9 clinics (assessing implementation [provision of CC screening with HPV self-testing] and effectiveness [proportion of HPVpositive WLWH who receive subsequent diagnostic triage and/or treatment] over months 0-12; and Aim 3), assess Sustainability (costs, cost-effectiveness, and transfer of delivery from study to local staff over months 13-18.

Significance of the study The overall goal of this study is to employ rigorous empirical methods to adapt and test implementation strategies that expand the scope of HIV care to screen for and treat early precancerous CC lesions in a sustainable, scalable way. Through partnering with Kenya's MOH, this project will have critical institutional support and dissemination capability, and will directly inform public health practice and policy.

Read the detailed description

Broad Objectives This study seeks to inform the effective and sustainable integration of early detection and successful treatment of precancerous cervical lesions among women living with HIV (WLWH) ages 25-49 years in HIV care clinics for women in Kenya.

Specific Objectives I. Identify and address barriers to integration and uptake of cervical cancer screening and treatment linkage in HIV care settings in Kenya.

II. Evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of ENHANCE LINKage (HPV self-testing, care navigators, and mHealth that supports screening and treatment linkage) in a hybrid type 2 study, a cluster randomized trial in 20 HIV care clinics.

III. Evaluate sustainability and economic impacts of ENHANCE LINKage.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infection
  • Human Papillomavirus-Related Cervical Carcinoma
  • Screening Strategy

Browse trials for

03

In context

HIV Infections

4,734 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 244 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,280 is above the median of 80 across 3,489 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,405 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 237 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Aged 25-49 years
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Female
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Willing to participate in a 90-minute audio-recorded focus group discussion (FGD) and
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Speak English or Swahili
  • AIM 1 (NURSES, CLINICAL STAFF, ADMINISTRATORS): Aged 18 years or older
  • AIM 1 (NURSES, CLINICAL STAFF, ADMINISTRATORS): Involved in implementing intervention components
  • AIM 1 (STAKEHOLDERS): Adults (aged >= 18 years) who are healthcare system users, support persons, healthcare providers and administrators, representatives of the government, professional associations, and non-governmental and faith-based organizations
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (CLINIC PROVIDERS): Aged 18 years and older involved in CC screening, triage, and treatment
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (WOMEN LIVING WITH ): Ages 25-49 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AIM 1: Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) members who are not engaged in CC work, individuals who have recently retired from the selected clinics, and patients who are attending the clinic for the first time will be excluded from the study
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (WOMEN LIVING WITH ): Pregnant women, women =\< 6 weeks postpartum, and women already confirmed to have cervical cancer will be excluded
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,280 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Aim 2, Arm I (ENHANCE LINKAge)

    Patients receive HPV self-testing kit and instruction on how to perform HPV self-testing on study. Patients undergo vaginal self-swab and receive results by text message. Patients also receive mobile text message reminders for triage or treatment for women that test positive with HPV.

    Other: Health Promotion and Education · Procedure: HPV Self-Collection · Other: Text Message-Based Navigation Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Aim 2 (standard care)

    Patients undergo standard of care at clinics that have VIA testing

    Other: Best Practice

Interventions

  • OtherBest Practice

    Receive standard care

    Also known as: standard of care, standard therapy

  • OtherHealth Promotion and Education

    Receive instructions on how to use HPV self-testing kit

  • ProcedureHPV Self-Collection

    Undergo HPV self-collection

    Also known as: At-home HPV Self Collection, HPV Self Collection, Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection

  • OtherText Message-Based Navigation Intervention

    Receive text messages for HPV testing results and triage and treatment reminders

    Also known as: Automated Text Message-Based Navigation, Text Message-Based Navigation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOME: Difference in proportions in cervical cancer (CC) screening uptake between the intervention implementation versus control clinics

    Modified mixed effects Poisson models will be used to estimate prevalence ratios, including the effect of clinic-level intervention (no intervention versus intervention) with fixed effects for intervention exposure status, and a random effect for clinic. Imbalanced baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across clinics will be included as independent variables in an adjusted model. Statistical differences between intervention versus control clinics during each observation period in terms of indicators will be tested using X\^2 tests while mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be tested using t-tests.

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

  2. EFFECTIVENESS OUTCOME: Difference in the proportion of patients that received follow-up triage (with VIA) or treatment in the implementation intervention versus control clinics

    Modified mixed effects Poisson models will be used to estimate prevalence ratios, including the effect of clinic-level intervention (no intervention versus intervention) with fixed effects for intervention exposure status, and a random effect for clinic. Imbalanced baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across clinics will be included as independent variables in an adjusted model. Statistical differences between intervention versus control clinics during each observation period in terms of indicators will be tested using X\^2 tests while mean differences and 95% CI will be tested using t-tests.

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Communication of human papillomavirus (HPV) test result to patients via mobile (m)Health messages

    Based on confirmation of HPV test results being sent to the participant's phone via two-way text message or mHealth application.

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

  2. Receipt of HPV-negative result and guidance for next CC screening

    Based on participants responding with a text to indicate that they have received their HPV results.

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

  3. Retention in HIV Care (>=2 visits per year)

    Between-arm comparison

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

  4. HIV viral suppression (undetectable)

    between-arm comparison

    Time frame: 1 to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Depends on regulations in Kenya regarding IPD

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Aug 2029, 32 months later.

Of 393 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under HIV Infections, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 402 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2024
First posted
Nov 27, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2030
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06708351
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Responsible party
Michael H Chung (Principal Investigator, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2024
Start date
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Amandine Zoonekyndt-Ballart
Contact
aballa3@emory.edu
404-727-1210
Mohammed K Ali, MD, MSc, MBA
Contact
mkali@emory.edu
404-727-9776
Michael Chung, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion