ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06701929Updated Aug 10, 2026

The Impact of Fasting Duration on Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Section

An observational study in Quality Improvement, Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia and Cesarean Section, sponsored by Jewish General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Jewish General Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the effect of fasting duration and elective c-section start time on the overall quality of recovery. Patients will be seen 24 hours after surgery to answer 11 questions on their overall recovery after surgery. Several factors will be tracked to determine their effect on recovery, with the primary variable of interesting

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective observational study aiming to evaluate the impact of fasting time before cesarean section on the quality of recovery after c-section. All patients presenting for elective cesarean section with low transverse incision, under spinal anesthesia will be considered for inclusion.

The primary outcome will be the ObsQoR-11 score approximately 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include the presence of nausea, vomiting or retching during surgery, the volume of intravenous fluid administered, the dose of vasopressor administered, the pain scores two hours after surgery, and the dose of opioid used in the 24 hours after surgery.

The primary analysis will be a linear regression to determine if there is a statistically significant correlation between fasting time and the ObsQoR-11 score while factoring in the variables mentioned above. Secondary analyses will determine if the fasting duration correlates with a change in any of the eleven components of the ObsQoR-11 score or the secondary outcomes listed. In addition, the fasting data will be plotted against the ObsQoR-11 score to determine if an inflection point is present.

Ten observations will be obtained for each independent variable included in the model, for a total of 100 patients in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia
  • Cesarean Section
  • Fasting ( 6H for Solid ; 2H for Clear Fluid )

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Quality of Recovery
  • cesarean section
  • fasting duration
03

In context

Fasting

392 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasting; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 74 observational studies indexed under Fasting.

Browse Fasting studies →

Lead sponsor

Jewish General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients presenting to the Jewish General Hospital for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be considered for inclusion.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presenting for elective c-section under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to communicate in French or English
  • Urgent c-section
  • Planned general anesthesia
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-11)

    Obstetric quality of recovery after c-section, which has been validated based on the total score of 11 questions, with total scores ranging from 0 to 110, where 0 is the worst, and 110 is the best.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nausea & Vomitting

    The presence of nausea vomiting or retching during or within 24 hours of surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score 2 hours after surgery

    Rating of pain, on a scale where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 2 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kielty J, Borkowska A, Lawlor E, El-Khuffash AF, Doherty A, O'Flaherty D. Use of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) to measure the impact of an enhanced recovery programme for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Feb;57:103955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103955. Epub 2023 Nov 10. PubMed 38030526 ↗
  • Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, Habib AS, Landau R, Zakowski M, Tiouririne M, Bhambhani S, Carvalho B. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1362-1377. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005257. PubMed 33177330 ↗
  • Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31. PubMed 30579408 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: After publication for two years

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 16 months after the start.

Of 46 non-industry observational studies under Fasting, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 16 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 48 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2024
First posted
Nov 22, 2024
StartActual
Mar 18, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 10, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06701929
Lead sponsor
Jewish General Hospital
Responsible party
Matthew Cameron, MDCM MPH (Associate Professor, Jewish General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2024
Start date
Mar 18, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Matthew Cameron, MDCM MPH
Contact
matthew.cameron@mcgill.ca
514-340-8222 ext. 25701

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion