CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06693466HD-P1Updated Nov 18, 2024

Huntington's Disease and Pain

An observational study in Huntington Disease and Pain, sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-18.

Sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of three internationally agreed pain test batteries in patients with Huntington Disease. The pain test batteries are developed to collect data about the facial expression of pain, body movements and vocalization of (non-) painful stimuli, and to collect data for testing the pain inhibition and facilitation. The study population will include 20 patients with genetically confirmed, adult-onset HD, in stage 1 (n=10) and stages 2 - 3 of HD (n = 10).

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a comprehensive experimental design with three internationally well-known experimental pain protocols in patients with Huntington Disease.

The exploratory objectives are:

  • To explore the psychometric properties (inter-, intra-rater and test-retest reliability and measurement error) of the facial expression, body movements and vocalization items of an observational pain scale, the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition Scale (PAIC15), in patients with HD.
  • To measure the overall facial expression of pain in patients with HD.
  • To explore the prevalence and extent of endogenous pain modulation in HD (facilitation, inhibition and the balance between the two).
  • To make an initial estimate of the measurement error (i.e. agreement), stated as the systematic and random error of a patients' score that is not attributed to true changes in the construct to be measured, for each endpoint related in current study to pain processing in HD (e.g. facial expression and the endogenous pain modulation outcomes).

Study design: An experimental, observational, cross-sectional study

Study population: The study population will include 20 patients with genetically confirmed, adult-onset HD, in stage 1 (n=10) and stages 2 - 3 of HD (n = 10).

02

Conditions studied

  • Huntington Disease
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Huntington's disease
  • Pain
  • Pain processing
  • Pain facilitation
  • Pain inhibition
  • Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15)
03

In context

Huntington Disease

285 studies on the registry are indexed under Huntington Disease; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 90 across 78 observational studies indexed under Huntington Disease.

Browse Huntington Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 326 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Genetically and clinically confirmed adult-onset HD patients (AoHD) (clinical onset ≥ 21 years, CAG repeats ≥ 36, Diagnostic Confidence Level [DCL] of 4]), in stage 1 (n=10 [named as HD 1]), stage 2 and 3 of HD (n = 10 [named as HD 2]), according to the Shoulson-Fahn system. Total Function Capacity (TFC) of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) will be used to define the HD groups: UHDRS-TFC score 11-13 (stage 1), 7-10 (stage 2), 3-6 (stage 3), 1-2 (stage 4) and a score of 0 (stage 5).

Inclusion criteria

  1. Genetically and clinically confirmed Adult-onset HD patients (≥ 21 years, CAG repeats ≥ 36; DCL of 4).
  2. Good general health apart from having HD. Note: Patients with chronic illness (e.g. hypertension) will be eligible if the illness is stable and well-controlled according to the investigator that will not impact the primary objectives of the study.
  3. Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Juvenile and Pediatric Huntington's Disease (age at onset \<21 years).
  2. Patients in the late stage of the disease (UDHRS-TFC score \<3).
  3. Have medical, psychiatric, or other conditions (other than HD) that, according to the investigator, may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information sheet, to give informed consent, to comply with all study requirements, or to perform study assessments.
  4. Have a history of (in the past year) or current (ab)use of any drug, alcohol or medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, may seriously interfere with the primary objectives of the study.
  5. The presence of a sensorimotor neuropathy or any another disturbance significantly disturbing the somatosensory systems, based on medical history and/or clinical examination, that can interfere with the pain test battery.
  6. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult-onset HD stage 1

    The adult-onset HD stage 1 group (total function capacity 11-13) include 10 participants. The subjects will be undergo three different pain test batteries .

    Other: Facial expression block · Other: Conditioned pain modulation block · Other: Pain facilitation block

  • Adult-onset HD stage 2-3

    The adult-onset HD stage 2-3 group (total function capacity 3-10) include 10 participants. The subjects will be undergo three different pain test batteries .

    Other: Facial expression block · Other: Conditioned pain modulation block · Other: Pain facilitation block

Interventions

  • OtherFacial expression block

    Data will be collected to assess the facial expression, body movements and vocalization of (non-) painful heat stimuli. The experiment includes individually tailored and randomly administered painful (perceived as moderate pain) and non-painful heat stimuli.

  • OtherConditioned pain modulation block

    The conditioned pain modulation will be tested according to internationally agreed standards and includes a painful phasic heat (test stimulus) and a painful tonic cold stimulus (conditioning stimulus).

  • OtherPain facilitation block

    Pain facilitation will be assessed by using painful mechanical pinprick stimuli. The magnitude of pain experienced after a single mechanical pinprick stimulus is compared to that of a train of 10 pinprick stimuli of the same force.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The feasibility of a comprehensive experimental design including three different experimental pain protocols in patients with Huntington's Disease

    A screening tool was developed to determine whether the comprehensive experimental design, with three various experimental pain protocols, is feasible in patients with HD. After each assessment, the screening tool will be scored. Each item of the screening tool represents an important part of the experimental pain protocol. A 'cut-off' score ranging from 60% to 80% was adopted for each item, indicating the minimum score to be met to consider as feasible for that specific part of the experimental pain protocol. The comprehension of the instructions, duration and the completion of the study are examples of items which will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment

Other outcomes

  1. Psychometric properties of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition- 15

    The intra-, interrater, test-retest reliability and measurement error (i.e. agreement) of the facial expression, body movements and vocalization items of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition - 15 will be assessed. The score of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition - 15 ranges from 0 to 45 points. A score of 4 or higher indicate the presence of possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  2. Overall facial expression of pain in patients with HD

    The facial expression will be assessed with the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition Scale. The score on the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition Scale ranges from 0 to 45 points. A score of 4 or higher indicate the presence of possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  3. Conditioned pain modulation

    Pain processing in terms of conditioned pain modulation( pain facilitation, inhibition and the balance between two) will be assessed by the (Computerized) Visual Analogue Scale (CoVAS). The (Computerized) Visual Analogue Scale is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable. A subject marks a point of the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  4. Conditioned pain modulation

    Pain processing in terms of conditioned pain modulation( pain facilitation, inhibition and the balance between two) will be assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) in case the Computerized Visual Analogue Scale is not feasible to use. The numerical rating scale consists of a series of numbers rating pain intensity, ranging from 0 to 10, with being 0 being "no pain", and 10 "severe pain".

    Time frame: Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  5. Measurement error Condition Pain Modulation

    An initial estimate of the measurement error (i.e. agreement) will be tested for the outcome of the endogenous pain modulation. The (Computerized) Visual Analogue Scale is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable. A subject marks a point of the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels. An appropriate analysis will conducted such as (weighted kappa), Intraclass correlation coefficient, SEM and/ or Limits of agreement.

    Time frame: Area under the curve; with a time frame 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 to 10 seconds.

  6. Measurement error Condition Pain Modulation

    An initial estimate of the measurement error (i.e. agreement) will be tested for the outcome of the endogenous pain modulation. The numerical rating scale consists of a series of numbers rating pain intensity, ranging from 0 to 10, with being 0 being "no pain", and 10 "severe pain". An appropriate analysis will conducted such as (weighted kappa), Intraclass correlation coefficient, SEM and/ or Limits of agreement.

    Time frame: Difference in mean score of the Numerical Rating Scale. Numerical Rating Scale is scored directly after the stimulus. The duration of the exposure is 10seconds.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Zuid-Holland 2333 ZA, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yarnitsky D, Granot M, Nahman-Averbuch H, Khamaisi M, Granovsky Y. Conditioned pain modulation predicts duloxetine efficacy in painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1193-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Apr 3. PubMed 22480803 ↗
  • Yarnitsky D, Bouhassira D, Drewes AM, Fillingim RB, Granot M, Hansson P, Landau R, Marchand S, Matre D, Nilsen KB, Stubhaug A, Treede RD, Wilder-Smith OH. Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):805-6. doi: 10.1002/ejp.605. Epub 2014 Oct 20. PubMed 25330039 ↗
  • Kunz M, Chatelle C, Lautenbacher S, Rainville P. The relation between catastrophizing and facial responsiveness to pain. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Sep 9. PubMed 18783885 ↗
  • Kunz M, de Waal MWM, Achterberg WP, Gimenez-Llort L, Lobbezoo F, Sampson EL, van Dalen-Kok AH, Defrin R, Invitto S, Konstantinovic L, Oosterman J, Petrini L, van der Steen JT, Strand LI, de Tommaso M, Zwakhalen S, Husebo BS, Lautenbacher S. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): A multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta-tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia. Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):192-208. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1477. Epub 2019 Oct 13. PubMed 31487411 ↗
  • de Waal MWM, van Dalen-Kok AH, de Vet HCW, Gimenez-Llort L, Konstantinovic L, de Tommaso M, Fischer T, Lukas A, Kunz M, Lautenbacher S, Lobbezoo F, McGuire BE, van der Steen JT, Achterberg WP. Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: Observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition. Eur J Pain. 2020 Feb;24(2):279-296. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1484. Epub 2019 Oct 22. PubMed 31520424 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Aim is to comply with the standards of the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and the contract of the funder of the study: European Huntington Disease Network (EHDN)

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06693466
Lead sponsor
Leiden University Medical Center
Collaborators
European Huntington's Disease Network
Responsible party
Susanne T de Bot, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, Leiden University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2024
Start date
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2024

Study contacts

Gregory Sprenger, Msc
Contact
g.p.sprenger@lumc.nl
+31 71 526 54 42
Susanne de Bot, MD, Phd
Contact
huntingtononderzoek@lumc.nl
+31 71 5262197
Susanne de Bot, MD Phd
principal investigator · Leiden University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion