ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06581965DISTINCTUpdated Sep 8, 2026

inDividual, Targeted thrombosIS Prophylaxis Versus the Standard 'One Size Fits All' Approach in Patients Undergoing Total hIp or Total kNee replaCemenT

A Phase 4 interventional study of Short duration prophylaxis and Higher intensity and longer duration prophylaxis in Venous Thromboembolism, Venous Thromboses and Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center. Recruiting at 13 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10,078
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 50 studies in Venous Thromboembolism with a site in Netherlands — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Venous Thromboembolism · Netherlands.

Planned enrollment
Largest of 36
10,078 · median 924
Started
2024
the only one that year
Phase 4
6 of 50
2 open now
Registered
50th of 50
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 50
Leiden University Medical Center

Among the 50 studies in Venous Thromboembolism with a site in Netherlands, this one has the largest planned enrollment of the 36 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2024, is one of 6 in phase 4, and was the 50th registered.

By phase

50 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 321 · 1 open
Observational14 · 1 open
Phase 4this study6 · 2 open
Phase 25 · 0 open
Phase 12 · 0 open
No phase1 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2024.

Size and results

Median enrollment 924 across the 36 interventional studies, 586 across the 14 observational. Of the 44 that completed or were terminated, 19 (43%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 50 studies in Venous Thromboembolism with a site in Netherlands, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

After hip or knee replacement all patients receive a standardized treatment with blood thinners, this medication is called thrombosis prophylaxis. However, despite this standard treatment some individuals still develop venous thrombosis (VTE), while others experience bleeding. This indicates that not all patients have the same VTE risk following surgery. Individualizing the amount of thrombosis prophylaxis following surgery might lead to less thrombotic and bleeding events. In this study the investigators individualize the treatment with thrombosis prophylaxis based on the medical history of a patient.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Can thrombosis prophylaxis be shortened in patients with a low VTE risk to decrease the risk of bleeding without increasing the risk of VTE? Does an increase in the dose and duration of thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with a high VTE risk reduce the risk of VTE without inducing an unacceptable risk of bleeds?

Researchers will compare both the shortened treatment in low VTE risk patients and the intensified and extended treatment in high VTE risk patients with the standard treatment to assess the risk of VTE and bleeding in comparison to the standard treatment.

Participants will receive 4 questionnaires to evaluate whether they have experienced a VTE or bleed. For this study no additional hospital visits are necessary.

Read the detailed description

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with an overall symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk of about 1.3% despite the use of prophylactic anticoagulants in all patients. While not preventing all VTEs, the uniform application of anticoagulant prophylaxis is at the same time associated with a major bleeding risk of at least 0.5%. Considering that a large proportion of all patients actually have a low VTE risk, this group is unnecessarily exposed to the burden and risks of thrombosis prophylaxis. On the contrary, some patients with a high VTE risk experience a VTE despite the use of the same prophylactic anticoagulants. These VTE cases could have possibly been prevented by intensified prophylaxis.

Objectives

Overall objective: To study whether the application of a targeted anticoagulation strategy leads to less thrombotic and bleeding complications in this large patient group.

Primary objective DISTINCT study arm 1 : To determine whether in-hospital thrombosis prophylaxis only is as effective compared with the standard thrombosis prophylaxis approach to prevent symptomatic VTE after total knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with a low VTE risk.

Primary objective DISTINCT study arm 2: To determine the incidence of symptomatic VTE after total knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with an intermediate VTE risk.

Primary objective DISTINCT study arm 3: To determine whether intensified thrombosis prophylaxis is more effective and equally safe compared with standard thrombosis prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic VTE in patients with a high VTE risk by comparing symptomatic VTE and bleeding complications.

Methods

The investigators hypothesize that:

  1. In patients with a low VTE risk the thromboprophylaxis can be safely shortened to in-hospital duration only, without increasing the VTE risk (in comparison with the standard duration). In addition, this will lead to less bleeds.
  2. In patients with a high VTE risk (individual predicted risk >1.5%), a therapeutic dose of thrombosis prophylaxis for 6 weeks is more effective to prevent symptomatic VTE, in comparison with the standard thromboprophylaxis. In addition, the investigators expect that the benefits of this approach (less symptomatic VTEs) outweigh the induced bleeds.

In the trial participants are allocated to one of three study arms based on the postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk predicted with the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

  • DISTINCT 1 (low VTE risk, \<1.0%) will be a randomized study arm.
  • DISTINCT 2 (intermediate VTE risk, 1.0%-1.5%) will be an observational study arm.
  • DISTINCT 3 (high VTE risk, >1.5%) will be a randomized study arm.

Participants will receive a questionnaire before surgery and 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. To assess the outcome measures. Furthermore an additional questionnaire is send 1 year after surgery if the participant experienced a VTE, major bleed or prosthesis infection. This questionnaire is focused on quality of life and joint function. Participants without such an event can be invited to complete this questionnaire as well. No extra hospital visits are needed and the surgery does not change.

Sample size calculations

In DISTINCT study arm 1, the expected 3-month cumulative incidence of symptomatic VTE in the control arm is 0.75%. No risk reduction or increase is anticipated, so the expected risk in the short-duration prophylaxis group is also 0.75%. With a non-inferiority limit set at 1%, a sample size of 3,130 patients is needed to achieve a power of 90%, leading to an aim to include 1,739 patients in each group, totaling 3,478 patients after accounting for a maximum dropout rate of 10%.

For DISTINCT study arm 2, in the intermediate-risk group, the expected cumulative incidence of VTE within 3 months is 1.3%. With a sample size of 2,500, a 95% confidence interval width of 0.9% - 1.7% is expected, ensuring a probability of less than 15% that the upper bound of a two-sided 95% confidence interval will exceed the 2% margin.

In DISTINCT study arm 3, a 3-month cumulative incidence of symptomatic VTE of 2.5% is expected in the control group. With an anticipated relative risk reduction of 50% in the intervention group, a sample size of 3,694 patients is necessary to achieve 80% power. Considering an interim analysis and a slightly stricter statistical significance level at the final analysis, a total of 3,748 patients is required, with 2,050 patients in each arm after accounting for a maximum dropout rate of approximately 9%, totalling 4,100 patients.

Ethics: The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden Den Haag Delft. All participants will provide informed consent.

03

Conditions studied

  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Venous Thromboses
  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Keywords

  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Prophylaxis
  • Individualized Medicine
  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Randomized controlled trial
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo an elective total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty
  • Aged 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary arthroplasty for fractures
  • Revision surgery
  • Hemiarthroplasty
  • Pregnancy
  • Current use of therapeutic anticoagulant therapy of any type (e.g., LMWH, DOAC, vitamin K antagonist)
  • A for either study drug
  • Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
  • Insufficient mental or physical ability to fulfil trial requirements
  • Active (i.e. cancer diagnosis within six months before surgery (excluding basal-cell or squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin), recently recurrent or progressive cancer or any cancer that required anti-cancer treatment within six months before surgery)
  • Patients using aggregation inhibitors that cannot be temporarily discontinued at the discretion of their treating physician
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10,078 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DISTINCT 1 short duration prophylaxis

    Patients with a low VTE risk (predicted 3-months postoperative VTE risk \<1%) based on the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

    Other: Short duration prophylaxis

  • Active comparator
    DISTINCT 1 control

    Patients with a low VTE risk (predicted 3-months postoperative VTE risk \<1%) based on the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

    Other: Control

  • Other
    DISTINCT 2 observational arm

    Patients with an intermediate VTE risk (predicted 3-months postoperative VTE risk ≥1%-≤1.5%) based on the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

    Other: Control

  • Experimental
    DISTINCT 3 extended prophylaxis

    Patients with a high VTE risk (predicted 3-months postoperative VTE risk \>1.5%) based on the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

    Other: Higher intensity and longer duration prophylaxis

  • Active comparator
    DISTINCT 3 control

    Patients with a high VTE risk (predicted 3-months postoperative VTE risk \>1.5%) based on the TRiP(plasty) score. (Nemeth, 2024)

    Other: Control

Interventions

  • OtherShort duration prophylaxis

    Only during hospitalization: any type of LMWH or DOAC in a prophylactic dose as approved by the Dutch guideline "Antitrombotisch beleid". First dose of LMWH within 6-24h following surgery. First dose of apixaban within 12-24h following surgery. First dose of rivaroxaban 6-10h following surgery. First dose of dabigatran within 1-4h following surgery. The applied type of anticoagulant is according to the local standard use (same type as used for control group).

  • OtherHigher intensity and longer duration prophylaxis

    The use of any thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors should be discontinued 5 days prior to surgery. Day 0-2: any type of LMWH or DOAC in a prophylactic dose as approved by the Dutch guidelines. First dose of LMWH within 6-24h following surgery. First dose of apixaban within 12-24h following surgery. First dose of rivaroxaban 6-10h following surgery. First dose of dabigatran within 1-4h following surgery. The applied type of anticoagulant is according to the local standard use. Day 3: Apixaban 5mg b.i.d., continued until 6 weeks after surgery, conditional on the fact that no active bleeding of the surgical wound can be observed. In case of active bleeding, the prophylactic dose of thrombosis prophylaxis is continued. Thereafter, in case no active bleeding has been observed for 24 hours, the 5mg b.i.d. apixaban treatment will be started. The 5mg b.i.d. apixaban dose will be adjusted to 2.5mg b.i.d. in case of an impaired kidney function (defined as eGFR 10-30ml/min).

  • OtherControl

    4 weeks: any type of LMWH or DOAC in a prophylactic dose as approved by the Dutch guidelines. First dose of LMWH within 6-24h following surgery. First dose of apixaban within 12-24h following surgery. First dose of rivaroxaban 6-10h following surgery. First dose of dabigatran within 1-4h following surgery. The applied type of anticoagulant is according to the local standard use.

    Also known as: Standard treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Venous thromboembolic events

    Number of VTEs in the first 3 months postoperative.

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

  2. Major bleeding

    Number of major bleeds in the first 3 months postoperative.

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinically relevant non major bleeding

    Incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

  2. Impact of events on QALY's

    Estimated using the EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: 90 days and 1 year postoperative

  3. Healthcare costs

    Healthcare costs will be estimated from patient questionnaires at 0, 2, 6, 13 and 52 weeks.

    Time frame: 90 days and 1 year postoperative

  4. Prosthetic joint infections

    Defined according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of periprosthetic joint infection described in Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):18-25.

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

  5. Patient reported quality of life

    Measured using the EQ-5D-5L (scored as described in: Value in Health 2016, 19(4), 343-352.)

    Time frame: 90 days and 1 year postoperative

  6. Patient reported quality of life

    Measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (score 0-100 with a higher score indicating a higher quality of life)

    Time frame: 1 year postoperative

  7. Patient reported outcome measures

    Measured using Oxford Hip score or Ofxord Knee Score depending on the performed surgery. (score 0-100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome)

    Time frame: 1 year postoperative

  8. Myocardial infarction

    Incidence of myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

  9. Ischemic stroke

    Incidence of ischemic stroke

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

  10. Death

    Incidence of death

    Time frame: 90 days postoperative

07

Study locations

12 of 13 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nemeth B, Smeets M, Pedersen AB, Kristiansen EB, Nelissen R, Whyte M, Roberts L, de Lusignan S, le Cessie S, Cannegieter S, Arya R. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for 90-day venous thromboembolism risk following total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a multinational study. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Jan;22(1):238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.033. Epub 2023 Nov 22. PubMed 38030547 ↗
  • Kok RY, van Bodegom-Vos L, Ettema HB, Groenwold RHH, van den Hout WB, Huisman MV, Klok FA, Nelissen RGHH, van Rein N, van Veen M, Vehmeijer SBW, Wiegerinck JJI, Cannegieter SC, Nemeth B. Study protocol for the DISTINCT trial: inDividual, targeted thrombosIS prophylaxis versus the standard 'one-size-fits-all' approach in patients undergoing Total hIp or total kNee replaCemenT - a national, multicentre, randomised, multiarm, open-label trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 6;15(10):e101180. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101180. PubMed 41057196 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After data collection and data cleaning are finished deidentified data will be registered in a repository and be made available for further research upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2030, 65 months after the start.

Of 34 phase 4 interventional studies under Venous Thromboembolism, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 88. This study's planned 65 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 25, 2024
First posted
Sep 3, 2024
StartActual
Nov 11, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2031
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06581965
Responsible party
B.Nemeth (Postdoctoral researcher Clinical epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2024
Start date
Nov 11, 2024
Primary completion
May 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Banne Nemeth, dr
Contact
B.Nemeth@lumc.nl
+31715264037
Ruben Y Kok, drs
Contact
R.Y.Kok@lumc.nl
+31715265633
Banne Nemeth, dr
principal investigator · Leiden University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion