CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06688552Updated Nov 14, 2024

Comparison of Acute Effects of Traditional and Drop Set Training on Fatigue and Proprioception in Bodybuilding Athletes

An interventional study of Proprioception Measurements and Fatigue Measurement in Fatigue Intensity and Proprioception, sponsored by Giresun University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to male participants aged 20 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-14.

Sponsored by Giresun University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2023, registered Nov 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 30 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

To compare the acute effects of traditional and drop set training methods on fatigue levels and proprioceptive sensory mechanisms in bodybuilding athletes.

Read the detailed description

A total of 28 male bodybuilding athletes with an average age of 25.53 years from Giresun and Ordu provinces participated in the study voluntarily. The participants were randomly divided into two groups as traditional training group (GS) (n=14) and drop set training group (DS) (n=14). Borg CR10 Scale and myotonometric measurements (Myoton Pro muscle palpation device) were used to assess fatigue. Myotonometric measurements were performed on the pectoralis major, triceps brachii and deltoideus muscles. Proprioception characteristics were evaluated in four parameters: shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion and wrist flexion using laser cursor-assisted angle repetition test.

After the application, fatigue levels in pectoralis major, triceps brachii, Borg CR10 parameters and proprioception errors in shoulder flexion, elbow flexion, wrist flexion parameters were significantly higher in the traditional set group compared to the drop set group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fatigue Intensity
  • Proprioception

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • drop set
  • traditional set
  • fatigue
  • proprioception
03

In context

Fatigue

1,863 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 377 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 54 across 1,443 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Giresun University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • -Being male.
  • Being between the ages of 20-30.
  • To have been doing bodybuilding for at least the last five years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • -Having undergone a serious surgical operation within the last year,
  • Having used a performance enhancing product that affects the neuromuscular mechanism within the last year,
  • In addition, individuals who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional set training

    Traditional set method and drop set method are widely used training methods in bodybuilding. Studies have shown that these methods have similar effects on muscle hypertrophy, increasing lean body mass and other metabolic variables when applied in equal volumes. However, there is no comparative study on the effects of these methods on fatigue and proprioceptive mechanism. In this context, it is thought that it is important to reveal the effects of traditional and drop set training methods on these two variables in order to take necessary measures to protect athlete health and improve athlete performance.

    Other: Proprioception Measurements · Other: Fatigue Measurement

  • Active comparator
    Drop set training

    Traditional set method and drop set method are widely used training methods in bodybuilding. Studies have shown that these methods have similar effects on muscle hypertrophy, increasing lean body mass and other metabolic variables when applied in equal volumes. However, there is no comparative study on the effects of these methods on fatigue and proprioceptive mechanism. In this context, it is thought that it is important to reveal the effects of traditional and drop set training methods on these two variables in order to take necessary measures to protect athlete health and improve athlete performance.

    Other: Proprioception Measurements · Other: Fatigue Measurement

Interventions

  • OtherProprioception Measurements

    Laser cursor-assisted angle repetition test was used for proprioception assessment. A coordinate plane with different movement angles was fixed on a wall and the person was positioned 1 meter from this wall. The laser pointer was fixed on the person's arm for shoulder proprioception measurement, 5 cm above the elbow to avoid being affected by other joints, 5 cm above the person's wrist for elbow joint proprioception and fixed on the person's second metatarsal bone for wrist proprioception.

  • OtherFatigue Measurement

    Myoton PRO® (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) muscle palpation device was used to assess fatigue, and the dynamic stiffness parameter was taken as the basis. The stiffness value is calculated as the maximum acceleration (N/m) of oscillation and deformation in the tissue sensed by the transducer (Chen et al., 2017). The increase in muscle dynamic stiffness has been associated with fatigue level (Klich et al., 2019; Shitova et al., 2020; Wang, 2017). Before the measurement, the athletes' pectoralis major, deltoideus and triceps brachii muscle reference points were determined and marked, and measurements were taken over these points. The athletes were asked to keep their muscles relaxed throughout the measurement in order not to affect the tissue stiffness and the application was performed at room temperature.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Demographic and Physical Characteristics

    A personal information form was used to obtain demographic information. The height measurements of the participants were made with a wall-mounted holtain stadiometer and body weight measurements were made with a Tanita MC-580 body analyser. BMI was calculated by dividing body weight by the square of height (kg/m2).

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Assessment of Proprioception

    Laser cursor-assisted angle repetition test was used for proprioception assessment. A coordinate plane with different movement angles was fixed on a wall and the person was positioned 1 meter from this wall. In the next step, the person's eyes were closed to prevent visual control and was asked to repeat the same joint position 3 times. The coordinate point where the individual brought the arm was marked on the coordinate plane and this process was repeated 3 times for shoulder flexion and abduction. The deviations at the given angles were measured on the horizontal (X) and vertical (Y) coordinate axes on the coordinate plane, the amount of linear deviation from the target was calculated using the Pythagorean theorem (√(x\^2+y\^2 )), and the arithmetic mean of the 3 deviations was recorded. Proprioception level= \[(√(x\^2+y\^2 ))+(√(x\^2+y\^2 ))+(√(x\^2+y\^2 ))\]/3

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Assessment of Fatigue

    Myoton PRO® (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) muscle palpation device was used to assess fatigue, and the dynamic stiffness parameter was taken as the basis. The stiffness value is calculated as the maximum acceleration (N/m) of oscillation and deformation in the tissue sensed by the transducer. The increase in muscle dynamic stiffness has been associated with fatigue level. Before the measurement, the athletes' pectoralis major, deltoideus and triceps brachii muscle reference points were determined and marked, and measurements were taken over these points. The athletes were asked to keep their muscles relaxed throughout the measurement in order not to affect the tissue stiffness and the application was performed at room temperature. All measurements were taken with the participants lying on the stretcher and the device was kept upright to minimise the effect of gravity on tissue properties, with three strokes on the reference points of the muscles.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Giresun University
    Gi̇resun, Centre 28200, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — I don't want my data to be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06688552
Lead sponsor
Giresun University
Responsible party
Nihat Sarıalioğlu (Asst. Prof., Giresun University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2024
Start date
Dec 20, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2024
Completion
Jul 10, 2024
Last update
Nov 14, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion