ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06683326EndoHandViewUpdated Nov 12, 2024

Smart-gloves Hand Motion Tracking for Live Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Training

An interventional study of ROKOKO smart-glove in Animal Model, sponsored by Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-12.

Sponsored by Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Learning endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is undertaken by experienced endoscopists in endoscopic mucosal resection and management of complications. Understanding the theoretical approach of the procedure and the cutting line is a prerequisite of performing it. The precise knife movements following the cutting line during incision, trimming and dissection takes time to master.

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends certain steps of the learning process: starting on animal models and further passing onto easier cases in patients, all these with expert supervision. Observation of experts directly or in live endoscopy meetings are recommended. Direct observation of the experts allow viewing and understanding the hand and finger movements during the specific ESD procedure phases (incision, trimming, dissection). Conversely, during live endoscopy meetings, one cannot see the hand and fingers movements of the operator. Using motion tracking smart-gloves, these fine movements may be visually broadcasted together with the endoscopic view during live meetings. There currently are no studies on motion tracking of hand and finger movements smart gloves in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Broadcasting the ESD expert's hands and fingers movements using a motion tracking smart-glove during a live endoscopy event will increase the trainees ESD procedure speed. Concomitantly seeing the endoscopic view and the hand and fingers view, the trainee will establish a relationship between the hand and fingers movement and the effect on the dissected tissue. A faster practical "how to do it" formula will hopefully be acquired by the trainee.

Additional benefits are expected, as a faster trainee learning curve will diminish the carbon footprint of the endoscopic training process.

A prospective randomized study will be implemented to test the research hypothesis. Trainees will be divided in two groups, depending on their view during live ESD procedures performed by the experts: the study group [endoscopic view + hand motion view] versus the control group [only endoscopic view]. The experts endoscopists will demonstrate ESD procedures on an animal model. Afterwards, the trainee will perform, under supervision, an ESD procedure on the same animal model. Several parameters will be noted: speed of the procedure, the en-bloc or piece-meal resection, the R0 resection, presence of complications (perforation) and the satisfaction score of the trainee on a numerical visual scale.

Read the detailed description

Rationale.

ESD is difficult to learn. Learning is usually undertaken by already trained endoscopists, with experience in difficult polypectomy. Except marking, hemostasis and clip closure, the very precise distinctive ESD movements - incision, trimming and submucosal dissection are new hand gestures for someone starting this path.

After studying ESD strategy and tactics - where to start and continue ("when to cut") and what part of the lesion ("what to cut"), one needs to understand the cutting line ("where to cut"). This cutting line is to be followed precisely, in an extremely accurate manner during incision, trimming and actual submucosal dissection. Any millimetric deviation from this ideal line may and will result in lengthening or procedure failure in best case scenario and in iterative bleedings and perforation in worst case scenarios.

The ESGE learning curricula recommends that a proficient in EMR endoscopist should start supervised ESD training. Firstly, in animal models (at least 20 procedures with no perforation in the last 10 training cases and 80% R0 rate) and afterwards, supervised simpler cases on real patients [1]. Observing at least 20 ESD procedures performed by experts in tertiary referral centers as well as live conferences and meetings are encouraged.

Based on available evidence, current ESGE and ASGE guidelines for best practices of live endoscopy events do not find an increased harm for patients [2,3]. Moreover, in a study comparing the outcomes of ESD in a live event versus standard of care, the outcome numbers were non-inferior, and some were even slightly non significantly superior (en-bloc rates 100% vs. 87%, curative rates 84% vs. 71%, complication rates 5% vs. 13%, 5-year survival rates 70% vs. 65%) [4]. Nevertheless, both guidelines state that there is no current data supporting that attending live endoscopy events will improve ESD outcome in trainees.

Unfortunately, observing an ESD procedure during a live endoscopy event is not the same experience as being in the same room as the operator. The endoscopic screen and the verbal explanations may be there. Still, the exact hand movements by the operator will be missed. Viewing the expert's hands and fingers movements during such a complex procedure is of utmost importance.

A recent 2023 study evaluated the benefit of a live broadcasting GoPro action camera attached to the endoscopist head [5]. The supplementary doctor's eye-view video increased the trainees interest and understanding of the procedure. However, as the endoscopist gaze will be pointed to the endoscopy screen most of the time, the hand and finger gestures will not be GoPro broadcasted and live seen by trainees.

How to observe and analyze hand and finger movements during and ESD procedure? Hand gestures during colonoscopy were quantified in different studies assessing pressure and force by tactile pads, electrogoniometers, magnetic trackers and electromagnetic motion sensors [6-9]. These studies aimed to assess muscle strain and postures during colonoscopy and their different patterns in expert and novice operators.

Smart-gloves were proposed to measure kinesthetic and tactile feed-back, but also hand and finger pose and motion tracking [10]. Medical studies so far used hand motion tracking smart-gloves to quantify and/or monitor concomitant brain activation, hand joints stress, chest compressions during CPR, drawing coordination skills, surgical knot tying and post stroke hand grip rehabilitation [11-16]. Tracking hand and fingers motion during ESD may be possible as well using available commercial smart-gloves.

The ROKOKO smart-gloves use electro-magnetic field (EMF) sensors to capture precise hand and finger movements. It instantly broadcasts with 100 frame per second rate, without lag or latency. It may be integrated with all major 3D animation tools and game engines and is currently used, among others, by Walt Disney Studios, Universal Studios, Sony, Netflix, HBO, Electronic Arts, [17].

Study hypothesis.

Broadcasting the ESD expert's hands and fingers movements using a motion tracking smart-glove during a live endoscopy event will increase the trainees speed of the ESD procedure. It will increase the rate of en-bloc resection, the rates of curative resection and will decrease the rate of complications. While at distance, the trainee will be able to concomitantly see the two screens - the [endoscopic view] and the [hand and fingers view]. A relationship between the hand and fingers motions and the transmitted effect onto knife tip and further onto the lesion tissue will be better understood. A practical "how to do it" knowledge will be hopefully acquired by the trainee, faster.

02

Conditions studied

  • Animal Model
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ESD trainees with experience in EMR and difficult polypectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ESD trainees with previous significant experience in ESD on animal model
  • ESD trainees with previous significant experience in ESD on patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study group

    Trainees viewing live broadcasting of the ESD screen, with live explanations by the expert and simultaneous viewing of the expert hands and fingers motion broadcasted by the ROKOKO smart-glove.

    Device: ROKOKO smart-glove

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Control group, trainees viewing live broadcasting of the ESD screen, with live explanations by the expert

Interventions

  • DeviceROKOKO smart-glove

    ESD expert hands and fingers motion broadcasted by the ROKOKO smart-glove to trainees

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean speed of the procedure

    Measured in mm2/minute. Equal to the sum of the procedure speed for each procedure divided by the number of procedures for each study group.

    Time frame: During procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of en-bloc resection

    Defined as lesions resected in one piece. Equal to the number of en-bloc resected lesions divided by the number of resected lesions for each study group.

    Time frame: During procedure

  2. Rate of R0 resection.

    Defined as lesions resected in one piece containing all peripheral marking dots. Equal to the number of R0 resections divided by the number of resected lesions in each group.

    Time frame: During procedure

  3. Rate of perforation.

    Equal to the number of perforations divided by the number of resected lesions in each group.

    Time frame: During procedure

  4. Median satisfaction score.

    Measured on a visual analogue scale (0 to 10, 0 equal unsatisfied, 10 equal maximum satisfaction). Equal to the median satisfaction value of trainees within each study group.

    Time frame: Immediately after procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Pioche M, Albeniz E, Berr F, Deprez P, Ebigbo A, Dewint P, Haji A, Panarese A, Weusten BLAM, Dekker E, East JE, Sanders DS, Johnson G, Arvanitakis M, Ponchon T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bisschops R. Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2019 Oct;51(10):980-992. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-0912. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PubMed 31470448 ↗
  • Webster GJ, El Menabawey T, Arvanitakis M, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Messmann H, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Live endoscopy events (LEEs): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Position Statement - Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):842-849. doi: 10.1055/a-1511-1657. Epub 2021 Jun 10. PubMed 34111899 ↗
  • Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Akshintala VS, Kothari S, Sethi A, Rastogi A, Palmisano DJ Jr, Zhang LY, Hess MR, Rashba K, Gupta N, Wani S, Komanduri S. Best live endoscopy practices: an ASGE white paper. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Mar;97(3):383-393.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.012. Epub 2023 Jan 11. No abstract available. PubMed 36639318 ↗
  • Ebigbo A, Freund S, Probst A, Rommele C, Golder SK, Frauenschuh J, Marienhagen J, Messmann H. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) during live endoscopy events (LEE) - a 13-year follow-up. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Dec;7(12):E1723-E1728. doi: 10.1055/a-1035-9240. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PubMed 31828208 ↗
  • Uchiyama A, Yamashina S, Sato T, Sakuma S, Tomiki Y, Isayama H, Nagahara A, Ikejima K. Benefit of an action camera in endoscopy education for medical students under COVID-19. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04702-6. PubMed 37740173 ↗
  • Shergill AK, Asundi KR, Barr A, Shah JN, Ryan JC, McQuaid KR, Rempel D. Pinch force and forearm-muscle load during routine colonoscopy: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jan;69(1):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.030. PubMed 19111694 ↗
  • Browne A, O'Sullivan L. A medical hand tool physical interaction evaluation approach for prototype testing using patient care simulators. Appl Ergon. 2012 May;43(3):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 30. PubMed 21880299 ↗
  • Mohankumar D, Garner H, Ruff K, Ramirez FC, Fleischer D, Wu Q, Santello M. Characterization of right wrist posture during simulated colonoscopy: an application of kinematic analysis to the study of endoscopic maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.023. Epub 2014 Jan 17. PubMed 24439784 ↗
  • Holden MS, Wang CN, MacNeil K, Church B, Hookey L, Fichtinger G, Ungi T. Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jan;13(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4. Epub 2017 Oct 30. PubMed 29086234 ↗
  • Caeiro-Rodriguez M, Otero-Gonzalez I, Mikic-Fonte FA, Llamas-Nistal M. A Systematic Review of Commercial Smart Gloves: Current Status and Applications. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;21(8):2667. doi: 10.3390/s21082667. PubMed 33920101 ↗
  • Brand J, Piccirelli M, Hepp-Reymond MC, Eng K, Michels L. Brain Activation During Visually Guided Finger Movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 14;14:309. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00309. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32922274 ↗
  • Jaskiewicz F, Kowalewski D, Starosta K, Cierniak M, Timler D. Chest compressions quality during sudden cardiac arrest scenario performed in virtual reality: A crossover study in a training environment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 25;99(48):e23374. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023374. PubMed 33235109 ↗
  • Lee HS, Lim JH, Jeon BH, Song CS. Non-immersive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Applied to a Task-oriented Approach for Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020;38(2):165-172. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190975. PubMed 32176674 ↗
  • Lacroute J, Marcantoni J, Petitot S, Weber J, Levy P, Dirrenberger B, Tchoumak I, Baron M, Gibert S, Marguerite S, Huppertz J, Gronier O, Derlon A. The carbon footprint of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2023 Oct;55(10):918-926. doi: 10.1055/a-2088-4062. Epub 2023 May 8. PubMed 37156511 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2025; primary completion for May 2025, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2024
First posted
Nov 12, 2024
StartEst.
May 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 12, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06683326
Lead sponsor
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Responsible party
Mihai Ciocirlan (Associate Professor, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2024

Study contacts

Mihai Ciocirlan, MD
Contact
ciocirlanm@yahoo.com
+40722322625
Mihai Ciocirlan, MD
principal investigator · Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion