ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06683287Updated Nov 12, 2024

Effects of Low-Level Red Light and Distant-Image Screen for Myopia Control in Children

An interventional study of red light and distant image screen and red light in Myopia, sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-12.

Sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2023, registered Nov 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of daily exposure to 650-nm low-level red light (RL) and distant-image therapy (DIT) for myopia treatment.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized clinical trial. Children aged 8 to 10 years with a spherical equivalent error (SER) ranging from -1 to -1.5 diopters (D) were enrolled, and were randomly allocated to the following treatment group: RL, DIT, RL plus DIT, and control in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcomes were one-year change in SER and axial length.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • myopia
  • red-light
  • distant-image screen
03

In context

Myopia

1,007 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 80 across 803 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.

Browse Myopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tongren Hospital is the lead sponsor of 163 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Age between 8 and 10 years old. 2. The spherical equivalent error after pupil dilation was between -1.0 D and -1.5D.

    3. Corneal astigmatism ≤ 1.25D. 4. Interocular refraction discrepancy ≤ 1.5D. 5. Near-distance exophoria \< 10 prism diopters (△) and far-distance exophoria \< 6 prism diopters (△).

    6. Willingness to participate in the study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Intraocular pressure was below 10 mmHg or higher than 22 mm Hg. 2. Presence of amblyopia, or ocular pathological conditions such as retinal, lens, or corneal disorders.

    3. Children currently using atropine or orthokeratology for myopia control. 4. Patients with systemic and immune disorders such as albinism, psoriasis, nephrotic syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes, etc.

    5. Individuals with conditions like Tourette's syndrome or epilepsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    red-light

    Children in this group received a red-light apparatus (LS-03B; Yishiliang Inc), which has been deemed safe by the State Administration for Market Regulation of China. They were directed to utilize this apparatus twice a day for 3-minute sessions, ensuring a gap of over 4 hours between each use.

    Device: red light

  • Experimental
    distant-image screen group

    participants were given a distant-image screen ( RIO-Max2.0; Ruishi Inc), and were asked to use this device for ≥1 hour/day

    Device: distant image screen

  • Experimental
    red-light plus distant image screen

    For this group, participants were given a red-light device (LS-03B; Yishiliang Inc) and a distance image screen device ( RIO-Max2.0; Ruishi Inc), and were asked to use red-light twice a day for 3-minute sessions, ensuring a gap of over 4 hours between each use, and use distant image screen for ≥1 hour/day

    Device: red light and distant image screen

  • No intervention
    control

    No intervention

Interventions

  • Devicered light and distant image screen

    red light plus distant image screen, children use these two devices at the same time

  • Devicered light

    children use red light for 3 minutes each time, twice a day

  • Devicedistant image screen

    Children in this group were asked to use this device for ≥1 hour/day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in axial length

    Axial length was measured using an optical biometer (Colombo IOL, Moptim)

    Time frame: one year

  2. Changes in spherical equivalent error

    Spherical equivalent error was calculated from the dioptric powers of the sphere and half of the cylinder.The children's pupils were dilated using tropicamide eyedrops, then SER was subsequently measured using an auto refractor (ARK-510A, Nidek Co Ltd)

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital
    Beijing, China 100730, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang K, Wang Y, Li X, Liu S, Shi H, Qiao L. One-year changes in axial length and refraction in children using low-level red light and distant-image screen for myopia control: a randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 25;12:1542620. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1542620. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40201319 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in May 2023, 1 month.

Of 195 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myopia, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 379 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 6, 2024
First posted
Nov 12, 2024
StartActual
Apr 10, 2023
Primary completionActual
May 15, 2023
CompletionActual
May 15, 2023
Last update
Nov 12, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06683287
Responsible party
cao kai (Dr, Beijing Tongren Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2024
Start date
Apr 10, 2023
Primary completion
May 15, 2023
Completion
May 15, 2023
Last update
Nov 12, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion