ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06679842PAPISLAUpdated Nov 8, 2024

Early Ascitis Parencentesis in SBP

An interventional study of ascitis paracentesis in Cirrhosis and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-08.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Paracentesis at 48 hours, as recommended in international guidelines, could delay the time to effective antibiotic therapy in cases of SBP with germs resistant to empirical antibiotic therapy. Earlier paracentesis at 24 hours could save time in initiating the right antibiotic therapy and improve prognosis.

Read the detailed description

International recommendations call for exploratory paracentesis to be performed on admission in all cirrhotic patients presenting with clinical ascites. Based on data from a study published in 1990, the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial infection (SBP) is defined by the presence of neutrophils (PNN) ≥ 250/mm3 in ascites fluid, irrespective of the bacteriological culture result . Although culture of ascites fluid is negative in 40-60% of confirmed cases of ISLA, and it takes 2-5 days to obtain a result, it remains essential to best adapt antibiotic therapy. Empirical antibiotic therapy is started as soon as SBP is diagnosed. Response to antibiotic therapy is defined as a reduction of more than 25% in the number of PNN in ascites sampled 48 hours after initiation of treatment. However, the landmark study by Akriviadis et al showed that the mean number of PNN fell significantly as early as 24 hours after the start of treatment, with a drop in PNN as early as the 6th hour. In the absence of a response to treatment, antibiotic therapy should be modified on the basis of culture results if positive, or empirically in the absence of bacteriological documentation. A recent study showed that a reduction in the number of PNN in ascites fluid after effective empirical antibiotic therapy was significantly associated with improved survival. Thus, waiting 48 hours to perform a follow-up paracentesis could delay the adjustment of effective antibiotic therapy in the event of initial non-response, and thus worsen the prognosis of SBP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cirrhosis
  • Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • resistant bacteria
  • spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  • antibiotic
  • early paracentesis
03

In context

Fibrosis

1,270 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibrosis; 276 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 63 across 840 interventional studies indexed under Fibrosis.

Browse Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 97 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged 18 or over
  • Affiliation with a French social security
  • Signature of the form
  • Cirrhosis
  • Ascites fluid infection with PNN > 250/mm3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision; persons under psychiatric care.
  • Adults under legal protection
  • Subjects within the exclusion period of another study
  • Other cause of abdominal infection than SBP
  • Intra-abdominal surgery \< 4 weeks
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    one arm

    Diagnostic Test: ascitis paracentesis

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testascitis paracentesis

    ascitis paracentesis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the percentage drop in neutrophils in ascites on Day 1

    Evaluate the percentage drop in neutrophils in ascites on Day 1, in order to assess the best threshold for predicting response to antibiotic therapy on Day 1 (judged on Day 2) in patients with ascites fluid infection.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hepatology Unit, CHU Besancon
    Besancon, Doubs 25000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2024; primary completion for Mar 2026, 16 months later.

Of 186 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fibrosis, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 194 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 6, 2024
First posted
Nov 8, 2024
StartEst.
Nov 11, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Nov 8, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06679842
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2024
Start date
Nov 11, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 8, 2024

Study contacts

Jean Paul CERVONI, Hospital Practioner
Contact
jpcervoni@chu-besancon.fr
+33 3 81 66 80 20

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion