CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06679244Updated Jul 22, 2025

Application of a New Surgical Technique in Proximal Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

An interventional study of Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique and Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy, sponsored by Huashan Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-22.

Sponsored by Huashan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective study using a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label, and efficacy validated approach.At present, there is no universally recognized optimal method for gastrointestinal reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.Author's team has proposed an innovative method named Hao's Esophagogastrostomay by Fisture Technique (HEFT).By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" to the anastomosis of the residual stomach of the esophagus, not only can the purpose of anti reflux be achieved, but also the normal physiological channel can be maintained, it can fully utilize residual stomach function and reduce the difficulty of surgery.Through retrospective research, our single center has confirmed that HEFT is safe and feasible.On this basis, this study will compare the nutritional status, short- and medium- to long-term safety after laparoscopic HEFT and double-tract reconstruction , in order to evaluate and discover more reasonable digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy, and to promote the development and popularization of minimally treatment technology for gastric cancer.

This study was jointly conducted by Shanghai-level hospitals (Huashan Hospital ,Shanghai Cancer Center, and Ruijin Hospital), with Huashan Hospital as the leading unit. This study will recruit 52 patients, with 26 patients in the experimental group and 26 patients in the control group. Using a central dynamic randomization method based on minimization, patients are assigned to groups in a 1:1 ratio. Based on the different anastomotic methods used in proximal gastrectomy, patients are divided into a HEFT group (experimental group) and a double-tract reconstruction group (control group).Plan to collect cases for 2 years, and follow up for another year after the last case is enrolled.

The primary endpoint of the study was the body weight loss (BWL) rate at 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints: Effect evaluation indicators: hemoglobin level at 1 year after surgery; Serum albumin level at 1 year after surgery; The incidence of anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery; Incidence of reflux esophagitis at 1 year after surgery. Evaluation of short-term surgical safety (duration: 7 days): operation time, intraoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic leakage, and incidence of abdominal infection; Evaluation of medium- and long-term safety after surgery (duration: 36 months): overall survival rate at 3 years after surgery; disease-free survival rate at 3 years after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy

Keywords

  • proximal gastrectomy
  • totally laparoscopic gastrectomy
  • fissure technique
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Huashan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years old ≤ 80 years old;
  2. The primary tumor lesion is located in the upper part of the stomach or the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II or III), and it is expected that R0 surgical results can be obtained by performing proximal gastrectomy and D2 dissection;
  3. The primary lesion was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma through endoscopic biopsy and histopathological examination;
  4. If it is upper gastric adenocarcinoma, the clinical TNM staging based on imaging needs to be cT1N0M0. If it is ductal gastric junction adenocarcinoma, it needs to be cT1-3N0-1M0, and clinical imaging judgment shows no distant gastric lymph node metastasis;
  5. Expected survival exceeds 6 months;
  6. No history of upper abdominal surgery (excluding laparoscopic cholecystectomy);
  7. No chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. were performed before surgery;
  8. Preoperative ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) physical status score 0/1;
  9. Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading I-III ;
  10. Good function of important organs;
  11. Sign the patient's informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative imaging examination suggests the fusion of enlarged lymph nodes (maximum diameter ≥ 3cm) in the area;
  2. Pregnant and lactating women;
  3. Suffering from other malignant tumors within 5 years;
  4. Preoperative body temperature ≥ 38 ℃ or complicated with infectious diseases requiring systematic treatment;
  5. Serious mental illness;
  6. Severe respiratory diseases, FEV1\<50% of the expected value;
  7. Severe liver and kidney dysfunction;
  8. History of unstable angina or heart attack within 6 months;
  9. History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months, excluding old intracavitary infarction;
  10. Apply systemic corticosteroid therapy within one month;
  11. Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
  12. The patient has participated or is currently participating in other clinical studies (within 6 months)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Performing Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

    Procedure: Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

  • Active comparator
    Performing double-tract reconstruction

    Procedure: Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction

Interventions

  • ProcedureTotally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

    This is an innovative surgical method applied in proximal gastrectomy. By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" on the basis of esophageal residual gastric anastomosis, the goal of anti reflux is achieved, while maintaining normal physiological channels and fully utilizing residual gastric function, reducing the difficulty of proximal gastrectomy surgery

  • ProcedureTotally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction

    This is a traditional surgical method that has been widely used in proximal gastrectomy. After disconnecting the proximal stomach, performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis of the esophagus and jejunum firstly, followed by lateral anastomosis of the residual stomach and jejunum. Previous studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness, but there are also issues of gastric channel disuse and high missed detection rate of residual stomach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. body weight loss(BWL)

    Measure the weight before surgery and 1 year after surgery, BWL=(preoperative weight -1 year after surgery weight)/preoperative weight (unit:%)

    Time frame: From enrollment to 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin 1 year after surgery

    Hemoglobin (unit: g/L) 1 year after surgery will be used to evaluate operation effect.

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery

  2. Serum albumin 1 year after surgery

    Serum albumin (unit: g/L) 1 year after surgery will be used to evaluate operation effect.

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery

  3. Incidence of anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery

    Incidence of anastomotic stenosis(%) 1 year after surgery will be used to evaluate operation effect.

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery

  4. Incidence of reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery

    Incidence of reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery will be used to evaluate operation effect.

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery

  5. Duration of surgery

    Time spent on the whole operation(minutes)will be used to evaluate short-term safety of the surgery

    Time frame: intraoperative

  6. Intraoperative blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss(ml) will be used to evalute short-term safety of the surgery.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  7. Incidence of anastomotic leakage 7 days after surgery

    Incidence of anastomotic leakage(%) 7 days after surgery will be used to evaluate short-term safety of the surgery

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery

  8. Incidence of pancreatic leakage 7 days after surgery

    Incidence of pancreatic leakage 7 days after surgery will be used to evaluate short-term safety of the surgery.

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery

  9. Incidence of abdominal infection 7 days after surgery

    Incidence of abdominal infection 7 days after surgery will be used to evaluate short-term safety of the surgery.

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery

  10. Overall survival (OS) 3 years after surgery

    Overall survival (OS, %) 3 years after surgery will be used to evaluate medium- and long-term postoperative safety

    Time frame: 3 years after surgery

  11. Disease free survival (DFS) 3 years after surgery

    Disease free survival (DFS, %) 3 years after surgery will be used to evaluate medium- and long-term postoperative safety,

    Time frame: 3 years after surgery

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, 200025, China
    Recruiting
  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
    Shanghai, China
    Recruiting
  • Second Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,
    Shanghai, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Moriya H, Hirai K, Watanabe M. Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Sep;209(3):344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Jun 18. PubMed 19717038 ↗
  • Aizawa M, Yabusaki H, Nakada K, Matsuki A, Bamba T, Nakagawa S. A Retrospective Review of a Single-Center Experience with Posterolateral Fundoplication During Esophagogastrostomy After Proximal Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3230-3233. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05052-8. Epub 2021 Jul 8. No abstract available. PubMed 34240326 ↗
  • Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Sano T, Hiki N. Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Sep;22(5):1036-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00940-0. Epub 2019 Mar 6. PubMed 30838469 ↗
  • Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, Ueyama S, Tanaka N, Muraoka A, Hato S, Kimura T, Tanakaya K, Kikuchi S, Tanabe S, Noma K, Nishizaki M, Kagawa S, Shirakawa Y, Kamikawa Y, Fujiwara T. Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Oct 11;3(1):96-103. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12216. eCollection 2019 Jan. PubMed 30697614 ↗
  • Aihara R, Mochiki E, Ohno T, Yanai M, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, Ando H, Asao T, Kuwano H. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0947-8. Epub 2010 Apr 8. PubMed 20376493 ↗
  • Tanaka K, Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1587-4. Epub 2017 May 10. PubMed 28493146 ↗
  • Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Shimazu H, Nishi M. Antrum preserving double tract method for reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg. 1988 Jan;18(1):114-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02470857. PubMed 3386066 ↗
  • Zang L. [Reconstruction following laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;15(8):787-9. Chinese. PubMed 23072016 ↗
  • Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Terashima M. Impact of Malnutrition After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Long-Term Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):974-983. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8. Epub 2018 Jan 31. PubMed 29388124 ↗
  • Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, Omori T, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujitani K, Tamura S, Akamaru Y, Kishi K, Fujita J, Hirao T, Demura K, Matsuyama J, Takeno A, Ebisui C, Takachi K, Takayama O, Fukunaga H, Okada K, Adachi S, Fukuda S, Matsuura N, Saito T, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Yano M, Eguchi H, Doki Y. Multicenter prospective trial of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for upper third cT1 gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;24(2):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01129-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PubMed 33118118 ↗
  • Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36342574 ↗
  • GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;5(1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30328-0. Epub 2019 Oct 21. PubMed 31648970 ↗
  • Cui WL, Wang ZQ, Shi XL, Ma MY, Wang J, Wang ZH, Wang YP, Hong J, Hao HK. Application of Hao's Esophagogastrostomy by Fissure Technique (HEFT) in proximal gastrectomy: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e104365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104365. PubMed 40803728 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06679244
Lead sponsor
Huashan Hospital
Collaborators
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Cancer Hospital, China
Responsible party
Hao Hankun (Professor, Huashan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
Start date
Dec 4, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2025

Study contacts

Hankun Hao, doctor
Contact
haohankun@163.com
+86 18121186328

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion