CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06676696Updated Nov 6, 2024

Study to Compare the Outcome of Receiving Continued Immunosuppression Versus Stopping Immunosuppression at 6 Months to Safely Prevent Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Sensitization in Patients With Late Renal Graft Failure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Continue low dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal at 6 months in Renal Failure , Chronic, Graft Failure and Graft Rejection, sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-06.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Nov 2024).
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
202
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the degree of HLA sensitization at 2 years in patients with late renal graft failure (> 3 months) when receiving reduced immunosuppressant treatment versus stopping immunosuppression at 6 months.

The main question this study aims to answer is:

Does maintaining long-term immunosuppression in patients with a late renal graft failure (> 3 months) safely reduce the risk of HLA sensitization?

To answer this question, patients will be assigned to a control arm or investigational arm:

  • Patients assigned to the control arm will receive standard treatment, in which immunosuppressant treatment is withdrawn after 6 months.
  • Patients assigned to the investigatonal arm will continue immunosuppressant treatment at low doses for 2 years.

Patients recruited in this clinical trial will be followed for up to 2 years. During this time, patients will visit the clinic every 3 months for checkups and tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Failure , Chronic
  • Graft Failure
  • Graft Rejection
  • Allograft
  • Renal Failure Chronic Requiring Dialysis

Keywords

  • Renal failure
  • immunosuppressor
  • HLA sensitization
  • Graft failure
  • Calcineurin inhibitors
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency

1,995 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 202 is above the median of 43 across 1,504 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency.

Browse Renal Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 268 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient must be able to understand and provide written informed consent
  • Patients older than 18 years who had received at least one previous renal transplant
  • Patients with a retained kidney graft failed for any reason which survived at least 3 months
  • Patients on dialysis, either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Patients can be on dialysis for a maximum of 6 months at the time of randomization, as long as the patients have taken an uninterrupted immunosuppressive regimen of calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) and steroids since dialysis was restarted
  • Patients already relisted or candidates to relist to deceased donor kidney transplantation according to the treating physician criteria
  • Patients taking immunosuppressants tacrolimus or cyclosporine
  • cPRA at the time of randomization ≤ 90%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received another solid organ transplantation (liver, lung, heart or pancreas)
  • Patients waiting for a living related / unrelated kidney transplant
  • Graft survival of the failed graft lower than 3 months
  • Patients in dialysis more than 6 months at the time of randomization
  • Patients not accomplishing criteria to relist in the transplantation list according to the treating physician criteria
  • Pregnant women
  • Females of childbearing age who have not used or do not plan to use acceptable birth control measures, for the duration of the study. Patients should use one of the acceptable birth control measures recommended in the document "Recommendations related to contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials" published by the Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group (CTFG) (version 1.1, published 21/09/2020). Recommended birth control measures include oral, injected or implanted hormonal contraceptive, barrier methods (condom or diaphragm with spermicide), intrauterine device, surgical sterilization, transdermal delivery, or sexual abstinence. If sexually active, the subject must have been using one of the accepted birth control methods at least one month prior to study entry.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
202 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm

    Drug: Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal at 6 months

  • Active comparator
    Investigational arm

    Drug: Continue low dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)

Interventions

  • DrugContinue low dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)

    CNI dose (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) will be adjusted to maintain low tacrolimus or cyclosporine whole blood trough levels from month 3 to month 24 or End of Study

  • DrugCalcineurin inhibitor withdrawal at 6 months

    CNI dose (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) will be reduced to one-half on month 3 visit and completely withdrawn on month 6 visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of HLA sensitization

    The difference between the two treatment arms in the degree of HLA sensitization at 2-years measured as cPRA (%).

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality for any reason

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on mortality for any reason

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Days of hospitalization for any reason

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on days of hospitalization for any reason

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Percentage of patients effectively relisted during follow-up

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on percentage of patients effectively relisted during follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Percentage of patients transplanted

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on percentage of patients transplanted

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Percentage of patients delisted for any reason

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on percentage of patients delisted for any reason

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Incidence of infection

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on incidence of infection

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. Incidence of cardiovascular events

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on incidence of cardiovascular events

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Incidence of cancer

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on incidence of cancer

    Time frame: 2 years

  9. Incidence of graft-intolerance syndrome requiring graft nephrectomy or percutaneous embolization of the non-functioning graft

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years incidence of graft-intolerance syndrome requiring graft nephrectomy or percutaneous embolization of the non-functioning graft

    Time frame: 2 years

  10. Erythropoietin resistance index

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on erythropoietin resistance index

    Time frame: 2 years

  11. Residual renal function

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on residual renal function

    Time frame: 2 years

  12. Number of circulating memory B-cells

    The difference between the two treatment arms at 2-years on number of circulating memory B-cells

    Time frame: 2 years

  13. Adverse events

    The difference in the incidence of adverse events (AE) in the two treatment arms

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06676696
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2024
Start date
Jan 22, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2024

Study contacts

Francesc Moreso, MD, PhD
Contact
francescjosep.moreso@vallhebron.cat
93 489 30 00

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion