CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06674590Updated Nov 5, 2024

Effects of Motor Relearning Program Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Balance and Gait in Stroke

An interventional study of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Motor Relearning Program in Chronic Stroke, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Balance, sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-05.

Sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2024, registered Nov 2024).
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized control trial will be done on diagnosed stroke patients of chronic stage in DHQ Hospital Mirpur and FF Hospital Rawalpindi physical therapy Department.The purpose of the study is to determine Effects of Motor Relearning Program Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Balance and Gait in Stroke .

Subjects will complete Berg Balance Scale (BBS). 10-meter walk test for gait speed will be used for measuring walking speed in meters per second over a short distance, Timed-Up-And-Go (TUG) Test will be used for test of functional mobility and gait parameter. All these measures will be taken at baseline, then after 6 weeks of intervention. There will be 4 sessions per week. The control group will receive Group Motor relearning programe while the Study Group (B) will receive Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation(PNF)

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of this study are:

  1. To determine the effects of Motor Relearning program Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation for Improving Balance in stroke patient.
  2. To determine the effects of Motor Relearning program Versus ProprioceptiveNeuromuscular Facilitation on Gait Parameters in stroke patient.

HYPOTHESIS:

Alternate hypothesis:

Motor Relearning program as compared to Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation effective for balance and gait parameter in chronic stroke patient.

Null hypothesis:

Motor Relearning program as compared to Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation not effective for balance and gait parameter in chronic stroke patient.

Research Design: Experimental study. Randomized Control Trial

Clinical setting: DHQ Hospital Mirpur , Fauji Foundation Hospital . Study duration: 1 year

Selection Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria

  1. more than 6 month post stroke
  2. Can ambulate 25 feet/10 meter (with or without assistive device).
  3. Age between 25 to 65 years.
  4. Grades for MAS (Grade 2 0r less )/stage of brunstrom approach (stage 4 or up )

Exclusion Criteria

  1. History of neurologic disease other than the chronic stroke.
  2. Orthopedic disorder involving any joint of lower limbs that interfere with study.
  3. Gross visuospatial deficits .
  4. Unhealed fracture of lowerlimb .
  5. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
  6. Uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes .

Sampling technique: Non Proability Purposive sampling

Outcome Measures:

Data will be collected on Demographics and general information Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function .

10-meter walk test for gait speed The 10 Meter Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance.

Timed-Up-And-Go (TUG) Test:

test of functional mobility in which the participant stands up from a standard armchair, walks to a line on the floor 3 m away, turns around, walks back to the chair, and sits dow

Control group (A) = MRP divided into different task , duration will be 30 minutes. MRP for sitting to standing MRP for stand to sit MRP for walking Training of hip extension throughout stance phase Training of knee control for stance phase Training of lateral horizontal pelvic shift Training of flexion of knee at start of swing phase Training of knee extension and foot dorsiflexion at heel strike Practice of walking Transference of training into daily Experimental Group (B) =PNF of 30 minutes duration will given in a single session.

Pelvic anterior elevation and posterior depression of the hemiplegic side. rhythmic initiation slow reversal agonistic reversals Pelvic anterior depression and posterior elevation of the hemiplegic side. The first diagonal (D1): Flexion and extension The second diagonal (D2): Flexion and extension

Data analysis techniques:

The data will be analyzed through SPSS 21 and Data would be analyzed based on the study design chosen that is random control experimental study.

A printed questionnaire will be provided to the participents after obtaining written consent and providing adequate explanation regarding the study, after which the data will be presented in the form of graphs or tables.

Significance of the study:

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation compared to motor relearning program for chronic stroke patient may prove effectiveness in term of balance and gait parameters.

This study will help the practitioner to use the best treatment options for treating patients with stroke problem.

The results of the study will add to the literature about the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation as compared to motor relearning program for of balance and gait parameter in stroke patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Stroke
  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
  • Balance
  • Gait
  • Gait Speed

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Motor relearning program
  • Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
  • balance
  • gait
  • gait speed
  • stride length
  • cadence
  • cycle time
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 26 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Foundation University Islamabad is the lead sponsor of 238 studies on the registry; 128 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • more than 6 month post stroke
  • both male and female
  • Can ambulate 25 feet/10 meter (with or without assistive device).
  • Age between 25 to 65 years.
  • Grades for MAS (Grade 2 0r less )/stage of brunstrom approach (stage 4 or up )

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurologic disease other than the chronic stroke.
  • Orthopedic disorder involving any joint of lower limbs that interfere with study.
  • Gross visuospatial deficits .
  • Unhealed fracture of lowerlimb .
  • Peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group A

    It includes participants receiving proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation physical therapy for chronic stroke patient's for balance and gait parameter for a period of 6 weeks.

    Procedure: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

  • Experimental
    Experimental group B

    It includes participants receiving motor relearning program physical therapy for chronic stroke patient's for balance and gait parameter for a period of 6 weeks.

    Procedure: Motor Relearning Program

Interventions

  • ProcedureProprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

    PNF of 30 minutes duration will given in a single session. Pelvic anterior elevation and posterior depression of the hemiplegic side. rhythmic initiation slow reversal agonistic reversals Pelvic anterior depression and posterior elevation of the hemiplegic side. The first diagonal (D1): Flexion and extension The second diagonal (D2): Flexion and extension 4 session per week

  • ProcedureMotor Relearning Program

    Motor Relearning Programme (MRP) This is a task-oriented approach to help the control of movement, focusing on the relearning of daily activities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. gait parameter

    measurements of how a person walks, by using 10 meter walk test and TUG

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Balance

    an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady by using BBS

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
    Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06674590
Lead sponsor
Foundation University Islamabad
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2024
Start date
Jun 20, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 20, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2024

Study contacts

Muhammad Asif Tuseef, DPT
Contact
asiftuseef73@gmail.com
+923465129721

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion