ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06665711Updated Oct 30, 2024

Comparison of 3% Hypertonic Saline and Salbutamol in Children With Bronchiolitis

An interventional study of 3% Hypertonic Saline and Intervention: Salbutamol (Ventolin) in BRONCHIOLITIS, sponsored by University of Health Sciences Lahore. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 2 Months to 24 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-30.

Sponsored by University of Health Sciences Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Months to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchiolitis is a common lower respiratory tract infection that often leads to hospitalization in infants. The use of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline for treating bronchiolitis is being explored as an alternative to Salbutamol. In nebulizers, normal saline serves as a diluent, allowing water molecules or drugs to be inhaled into the lungs. However, there has been limited research on this topic, and no local trials have been conducted.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 3% hypertonic saline and Salbutamol in treating bronchiolitis. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, over one year, involving 100 infants divided into two groups: one receiving 3% hypertonic saline and the other receiving Salbutamol. The RDAI score will be evaluated before and during treatment to assess recovery time. Data will be collected using a proforma and analyzed with SPSS v25. The study aims to determine which treatment leads to faster symptom control and shorter hospital stays, with significance defined as a p-value ≤0.05. The findings will guide future treatment choices for infants with bronchiolitis.

Read the detailed description

Bronchiolitis, an infection of the lower respiratory tract, is one of the common reasons why the infants are hospitalized. The effectiveness of nebulized hypertonic saline (3%) in case of bronchiolitis is under discussion around the globe. With the use of normal saline as the diluent in nebulizers and the oxygen as vaporizer, the water molecules or drugs can be breathed through the mouth or nose and spread to the respiratory tract and lungs by the airflow. This is how, Salbutamol can be replaced by 3% hypertonic saline. However, a little work has been done in the past and no trials has yet been conducted at local setup. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline versus Salbutamol in the treatment of bronchiolitis. A Randomized controlled Trial will be conducted at Department of Pediatric Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore, for a period of one year. A sample size of 100 cases; 50 in each group will be included through Nonprobability consecutive sampling and will be divided randomly into two groups. In group H, 3% hypertonic saline solution will be provided. In group V, Salbutamol will be taken. Before and on the treatment day, the RDAI score will be examined for evaluation. A complete recovery time will be noted. Data will be filled in a proforma for record. SPSS v25 software will be used for data analysis. Both groups will be compared simultaneously to take mean time to control symptoms by using independent samples t-test and RDAI score. P-value ≤0.05 will be taken as significant. Therefore, selecting an appropriate drug with less chances of failure can be proved fruitful and can significantly reduce the hospital stay with early recovery. The results of this study will help to choose a better drug in future in the treatment of infants against bronchiolitis

02

Conditions studied

  • BRONCHIOLITIS

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • BRONCHIOLITIS
03

In context

Bronchiolitis

289 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiolitis; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiolitis.

Browse Bronchiolitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Health Sciences Lahore is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Months to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants aged 2-24 months
  • Gender; Both Male and female patients.
  • Presenting with bronchiolitis (as per operational definition)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Infant with metabolic disorder

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Immune deficiency
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention: 3% Hypertonic Saline

    In this arm of the study, participants will receive nebulized 3% hypertonic saline as the primary treatment for bronchiolitis. The administration of hypertonic saline is aimed at reducing airway edema and improving mucociliary clearance in infants experiencing respiratory distress due to bronchiolitis.

    Procedure: 3% Hypertonic Saline

  • Active comparator
    Intervention: Salbutamol (Ventolin)

    In this arm of the study, participants will receive nebulized Salbutamol, a bronchodilator commonly used in the management of bronchospasm associated with respiratory conditions, including bronchiolitis. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of Salbutamol in comparison to 3% hypertonic saline in improving the clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis.

    Procedure: Intervention: Salbutamol (Ventolin)

Interventions

  • Procedure3% Hypertonic Saline

    In this arm of the study, participants will receive nebulized 3% hypertonic saline as the primary treatment for bronchiolitis. The administration of hypertonic saline is aimed at reducing airway edema and improving mucociliary clearance in infants experiencing respiratory distress due to bronchiolitis.

  • ProcedureIntervention: Salbutamol (Ventolin)

    In this arm of the study, participants will receive nebulized Salbutamol, a bronchodilator commonly used in the management of bronchospasm associated with respiratory conditions, including bronchiolitis. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of Salbutamol in comparison to 3% hypertonic saline in improving the clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) Score

    The outcome measures of this study include the change in Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument , assessed at baseline and on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of treatment, as well as the time to complete recovery, defined as achieving an score of less than 5.

    Time frame: 5 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2024; primary completion for Feb 2025, 2 months later.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bronchiolitis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 57 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2024
First posted
Oct 30, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 6, 2025
CompletionEst.
Mar 10, 2025
Last update
Oct 30, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06665711
Lead sponsor
University of Health Sciences Lahore
Responsible party
Qasim Niaz (Post Graduate Resident Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences Lahore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2024
Start date
Dec 3, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2024

Study contacts

Qasim Niaz, Post Graduate Resident
Contact
info@uhs.edu.pk
111-33-33-66

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion