CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06661382Updated Sep 2, 2026

Use of Platelet Rich Plasma From Cord Blood vs Placebo in the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Infiltrative treatment with CB-PRP in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered May 2023).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Vulvar lichen Sclerosus (VLS) is a cutaneous-mucosal dermatosis that causes in the adult female vulvar itching and burning due to scratching abrasions. Dyspareunia is often associated . The areas most affected are the labia minora, the periclitoral area, the navicular dimple, and the perianal area. The placement of VLS in the context of immune-mediated dermatoses is the basis of the rationale for treatment with high potency topical corticosteroids. However, in some cases, local corticosteroid therapy is not sufficient resulting in a significant impact on the quality of life of the patient. This gives rise to the need to identify new treatments such as regenerative medicine.

The term PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) is used to describe a blood product generated by a two-step centrifugation process of whole blood of a patient to produce a concentration of platelets in a small volume of plasma. PRP can be produced from autologous, homologous blood or from cord blood (CB-PRP).

Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CB-PRP versus placebo in the treatment of VLS.

Read the detailed description

Lichen Sclerosus (LS) is a cutaneous-mucosal dermatosis characterized by chronic changes in the trophism and maturation of the epithelium and the connective tissue. In females, the vulvar region is affected in about 90% of cases, often constituting the only site involved. In the adult female, the predominant symptoms are vulvar itching and burning due to scratching abrasions. Dyspareunia is an often associated. The clinical course is irregular but progressive and is characterized by periods of relative quiescence alternating with episodes of exacerbation of symptoms. The areas most affected are the labia minora, the periclitoral area, the navicular dimple, and the perianal area. The placement of LS in the context of immune-mediated dermatoses is the basis of the rationale for treatment with high potency topical corticosteroids. However, in some cases, local corticosteroid therapy is not sufficient to achieve adequate compensation of the pathology, and significant changes may set in of the vulvar anatomy resulting in a significant impact on the quality of life of the patient. This gives rise to the need to identify new treatments such a regenerative medicine. The term PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) is used to describe a blood product blood generated by a two-step centrifugation process of whole blood of a patient to produce a concentration of platelets in a small volume of plasma. In addition to platelets, PRP contains large amounts of chemical mediators that promote angiogenesis, recruitment and proliferation of cells implicated in tissue regeneration and healing. PRP can be produced from autologous, homologous (donor) blood or from cord blood (CB-PRP). The main difference between PRP from peripheral blood (PB-PRP) and that from cord blood concerns the relative amount of growth factors and pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules. CB-PRP has been shown to be advantageous from a therapeutic point of view compared with PB-PRP because it contains higher concentrations of anti-inflammatory molecules. In addition, the use of CB-PRP allows for a final product that is not conditioned by the patient's age and by any associated comorbidities, which may instead compromise the quality of PB-PRP. Finally, the advantages of CB-PRP are related to lower production costs and to the greater ease of product preparation. The preparation process of CB-PRP involves a collection of cord blood following the expulsion of the placenta. The blood is then centrifugated using a two-step process. The final product is then injected on the vulvar surface under vulvoscopic guidance. Treatment with PRP is free of any major side effects. The objective of the following study is to evaluate the efficacy of CB-PRP versus placebo in the treatment of VLS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
03

In context

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 38 across 33 interventional studies indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.

Browse Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico is the lead sponsor of 214 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • women with VLS (clinical/histological diagnosis)
  • good health conditions
  • written informed consent signed and dated by the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • coagulopathies, platelet disorders, cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases
  • ongoing major infections
  • previous vulvar surgery (e.g., lipostructure and/or previous PRP)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Infiltrative treatment with CB-PRP Group

    Biological: Infiltrative treatment with CB-PRP

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo infiltrative treatment Group

    Biological: Infiltrative treatment with CB-PRP

Interventions

  • BiologicalInfiltrative treatment with CB-PRP

    Injection of CB-PRP or placebo into the vulvar site. Three treatments are planned four weeks apart. Three and six months after the last treatment with CB-PRP/ placebo each participant will be re-evaluated by vulvoscopy and biopsy, and will be given validated questionnaires to assess satisfaction, symptoms, and quality of life, psychological state, and sexual function.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of patient satisfaction through the compilation of the Likert scale: 1 very unsatisfied, 5 very satisfied.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Impression of Change in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of impression of global changes using the Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire. Patient Global Impression of Change is a single item questionnaire measuring the global changes since the start of the study treatment on a 7-point scale (1 worst outcome, 7 better outcome).

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in symptomatology in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of symptoms (itching, burning, dyspareunia and dysuria) using specific likert scale: 0 no symptoms (better outcome), 10 worst symptoms (worst outcome).

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Mucosal trophism in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of objective change of mucosal trophism through vulvoscopy.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Histological biopsy in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of changing of histological byopsy features, trough biopsy.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Sexual activity changes in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard of change in sexual life (considering sexual activity and sexual items like desire, orgasm, pain, lubrication and arousal) using Female Sexual Function Index.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Quality of life changes in treatment group vs placebo group

    We expect that women in the cord blood platelets rich plasma group will differ with regard quality of life, through Short Form Health Survey (12 items.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06661382
Lead sponsor
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Responsible party
Direzione Ginecologia (Principal Investigator, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2024
Start date
Jan 24, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 24, 2025
Completion
Jun 24, 2025
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

veronica Boero, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion