ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06649188Updated Oct 18, 2024

Electromotive Drug Administration of Magnesium Sulphate on Hypertrophic Scar

An interventional study of Magnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis and traditional physical therapy program in Hypertrophic Scars, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-18.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study 80 patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (40 patients for each group):

  1. Group A: Experimental: Magnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis for Postburn Hypertrophic Scar The study group includes 40 postburn hypertrophic scar patients will receive Magnesium Sulphate iontophoresis twice a week for 4 weeks; in addition to their traditional physical therapy program (deep friction massage, stretching and pressure therapy).
  2. Group B: Control: Traditional physical therapy for postburn hypertrophic scar This group includes 40 patients with postburn hypertrophic scar who will receive only the traditional PT (deep friction massage, stretching and pressure therapy) 2 sessions per week for 4 weeks
Read the detailed description
  1. Assessment measures and procedures:

    1. High resolution ultrasonography [Time Frame: Change of hypertrophic scar thickness from the beginning of treatment to the end of treatment (after 4 and 12 weeks from the beginning of treatment).

      High frequency ultrasound is the most common used technique for scar assessment. Its inferior resolution compared to optical equivalents is mitigated by its superior penetration depth allowing thickness analysis, even in severe scar thickening. The working mechanism is based on refection of sound waves of structures with different acoustic impedances and the analysis of the refection time to determine the depth of the structure. The penetration depth ranges from the upper dermal layers to full-thickness skin and subcutaneous structures, depending on the employed frequency (Elrefaie et al., 2020).

    2. Patient and observer scar assessment scale [Time Frame: Assessing the change of patient and observer scar assessment scale score from baseline (beginning of treatment) to 4 and 12 weeks after treatment.

    The scar will be rated numerically on a ten-step scale by both the patient and doctor on six items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area on the Observer Scale. The Patient Scale consists of pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity of the scar. Minimal score means good progression and maximum score means the scare is worse (Lenzi et al., 2019).

  2. Treatment procedures:

Iontophoretic drug delivery system (phoresors II auto model PM850 IOMED) The phoresors II auto model PM850 IOMED allows the user to deliver a specific dose from 0 to 80 mA/min, control the current from 0 to 4 mA and automatically calculates required time for the selected dose. Current ramp-up and down, shut-off, error messages and safety checks are also performed automatically. The builtin option for manual current shut-off is an added safety feature (Teslim et al., 2013).

  • Electrodes: Active-Anode (Drug Delivery).
  • Drug Used: MgSO4 Aqueous Solution.
  • Drug Ion Polarity: Positive Polarity. Prior to intervention, skin sensation will be assessed using warm water in a test-tube (temperature), pin prick (pain) and cotton wool (light touch) to ascertain the skin sensitivity.

Before each treatment, the surface area of the scar will be cleaned with cotton wool and alcohol to reduce skin resistance. 2.5 ML MgSO4 will be applied to the active positive electrode via a syringe with concentration 100 mg/cm2 (it's available in hospitals and not found in pharmacies), active electrode will be placed directly over the hypertrophic scar. The dispersive electrode will be applied to the skin 6 inch distal from the active electrode (Evans et al., 2001).

The dose needed will be selected in the device which is 75 mA/min (Teslim et al., 2013) then the current will be increased gradually depending on subject tolerance, ranging from 2 to 4 mA, the device will automatically calculate the required time for the selected dose. The interventions will be repeated twice a week for 4 weeks (Teslim et al., 2013). If a subject reports any sensation other than tingling, the treatment will be stopped, the electrodes will be removed and the skin will be inspected (Evans et al., 2001).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertrophic Scars

Keywords

  • Iontophoresis
  • Post burn
03

In context

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

129 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix, Hypertrophic; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 36 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix, Hypertrophic.

Browse Cicatrix, Hypertrophic studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,941 studies on the registry; 1,458 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1-Patient with hypertrophic scar (3-6) months after burn healing. 2-Age range between 20-40 years. 3-Male and female patients will participate in the study. 4-All patients have a post-burn hypertrophic scar at different body sites. 5-All patients enrolled on the study will have their .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1-Patients with prior medical histories of cardiac arrhythmias. 2-Patients with cardiac pacemakers. 3-Patients with orthopaedic implants. 4-Areas of skin with lesions and impaired sensation. 5-During pregnancy and breastfeeding. 6-Patient with diabetes mellitus. 7-Patients with a history of or adverse reactions associated with (MgSO4).

8-Recent MgSO4 administration 6 months before the study. 9-Any subject complaining of psychiatric disorders or neurological disorders such as myasthenia gravis

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Magnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis

    Device: Magnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis · Other: traditional physical therapy program

  • Sham comparator
    Group B: Control

    Other: traditional physical therapy program

Interventions

  • DeviceMagnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis

    Iontophoretic drug delivery system (phoresors II auto model PM850 IOMED) The phoresors II auto model PM850 IOMED allows the user to deliver a specific dose from 0 to 80 mA/min, control the current from 0 to 4 mA and automatically calculates required time for the selected dose. Current ramp-up and down, shut-off, error messages and safety checks are also performed automatically. The builtin option for manual current shut-off is an added safety feature (Teslim et al., 2013). * Electrodes: Active-Anode (Drug Delivery). * Drug Used: MgSO4 Aqueous Solution. * Drug Ion Polarity: Positive Polarity.

  • Othertraditional physical therapy program

    Deep friction massage, stretching and pressure therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of hypertrophic scar thickness

    High frequency ultrasound is the most common used technique for scar assessment. Its inferior resolution compared to optical equivalents is mitigated by its superior penetration depth allowing thickness analysis, even in severe scar thickening. The working mechanism is based on refection of sound waves of structures with different acoustic impedances and the analysis of the refection time to determine the depth of the structure. The penetration depth ranges from the upper dermal layers to full-thickness skin and subcutaneous structures, depending on the employed frequency (Elrefaie et al., 2020).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. The change of patient and observer scar assessment scale score

    The scar will be rated numerically on a ten-step scale by both the patient and doctor on six items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area on the Observer Scale. The Patient Scale consists of pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity of the scar. Minimal score means good progression and maximum score means the scare is worse (Lenzi et al., 2019).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2024; primary completion for Dec 2024, 1 month later.

Of 33 interventional studies with no phase under Cicatrix, Hypertrophic, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2024
First posted
Oct 18, 2024
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Oct 18, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06649188
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Aya Gamal Fawzy El-Sayed (Dr, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 18, 2024
Start date
Nov 15, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2024

Study contacts

Aya Gamal Elsayed, PHD
Contact
drayasa3ada@yahoo.com
+0201001475959

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion