ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06640075Act4CCUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Community Co-produced Action for Improved Access to Cervical Cancer Screening in Cameroon

An interventional study of Community co-produced action and Standard screening strategy in Cervical Cancer Screening, sponsored by Prof. Patrick Petignat. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Cameroon. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Prof. Patrick Petignat · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Oct 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Background - The burden of cervical cancer is unequally distributed globally, with over 90% of deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), mainly due to insufficient uptake of preventive measures such as screening. In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a global initiative for the worldwide elimination of cervical cancer as a public health issue, setting a target of 70% of women screened with a high-performance test. In Cameroon, this target is far from being reached, and rural communities are disproportionately affected by low uptake of screening services. Recently, a new cervical cancer screening program has launched in the Bafoussam Regional Hospital, in the capital of the Mifi Health District, as part of a larger research project. To develop a context-specific strategy improving access to screening for women living in rural areas of the district, the active participation of community members for the co-development and implementation of local strategies for cervical cancer screening may be key to improving population screening coverage.

Objective - The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of community co-produced action (CCA) for the development and implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategies compared to a traditional hospital-based approach in rural areas of the Mifi Health District in Cameroon.

Methods - Using a cluster-randomized study design, participatory workshops with community members will be led in 7 rural health areas assigned to the intervention arm, with the aim of codeveloping local strategies for HPV-based cervical cancer screening adapted to the setting. The co-produced strategies may include raising awareness among eligible women (aged 30-49 years, or 25-49 years if HIV-positive), as well as facilitating access to screening tests, results and follow-up. Women living in one of the 7 health areas assigned to the control arm will be invited by community health workers to undergo screening at the Bafoussam Regional Hospital. In both study arms, screened women will be included in the GENOVA study, a cervical cancer screening trial offering free-of- charge HPV testing followed by triage by visual inspection or genotyping for HPV-positive women, and free treatment according to triage results. CCA will be evaluated by assessing its effectiveness for screening uptake. Screening coverage among eligible women will be estimated during one year after implementation of screening strategies in both study arms, based on population statistics provided by the Mifi health district for each health area.

Expected results - Developing context-sensitive solutions to cervical cancer screening through a community-based participatory approach in rural areas of the Mifi health district is expected to improve screening participation rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer Screening
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Prof. Patrick Petignat is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 30-49 years old (25-49 years old if -positive)
  • Residency in one of the 14 rural health areas of Mifi health district
  • Ability to give signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known cervical cancer
  • symptoms compatible with cervical cancer
  • previous hysterectomy
  • terminal disease other than cervical cancer
  • cervical cancer screening test in the last 5 years (3 years if -positive)
  • pregnancy at the time of screening
  • lack of discernment capacity
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Community co-produced action

    Participatory workshops will be conducted with community members by a multidisciplinary team with the aim to co-develop a strategy for cervical cancer screening adapted to the local setting (including primary HPV screening, triage of HPV-positive patients and treatment of patients triaged positive).

    Other: Community co-produced action

  • Active comparator
    Standard screening strategy

    Recruitment of study participants will be coordinated centrally at district level (from the Bafoussam Regional Hospital) following procedures previously established in a cervical cancer screening program in the health district of Dschang.

    Other: Standard screening strategy

Interventions

  • OtherCommunity co-produced action

    Participatory workshops will be conducted with community members by a multidisciplinary team with the aim to co-develop a strategy for cervical cancer screening adapted to the local setting (including primary HPV screening, triage of HPV-positive patients and treatment of patients triaged positive). This intervention is referred to as 'community co-produced action'. Possible strategies co-developed may include collaboration with community health workers or local associations, awareness campaigns, development of health education materials, integration of primary HPV screening at local integrated health centers, organization of group transportation to the district screening center, etc. Using purposive sampling methods, approximately 15 participants will be invited to take part in the workshops in each health area of the intervention, including approximately 3 health care providers, 3 community health workers or members of women's associations, 3 men and 6 eligible women for screening.

  • OtherStandard screening strategy

    Recruitment of study participants will be coordinated centrally at district level (from the Bafoussam Regional Hospital) following procedures previously established in a cervical cancer screening program in the health district of Dschang. This standard procedure includes the training of 2 community health workers (CHW) by health area to raise awareness around cervical cancer. After an initial theoretical and practical training in cervical cancer prevention, CHWs recruit women by going door-to-door or through community meetings in their respective health areas. Through a system of nominal invitation vouchers distributed to eligible women, CHWs receive a financial incentive for each woman that shows up for cervical cancer screening. Twice a year, CHWs of all health areas are invited to a feedback session to discuss difficulties encountered on the field and propose solutions to face any identified challenges.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of women having completed screening for cervical cancer

    Complete screening (defined as an HPV test +/- triage for HPV-positive women) among the eligible population in both study arms.

    Time frame: HPV test within 12 months after implementation of the screening strategy at health-area level, and triage within 6 months of the HPV test if positive.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of women having completed primary screening

    Rate of primary screening (HPV test) among the eligible population in both study arms.

    Time frame: Within 12 months after implementation of the screening strategy at health-area level

  2. Number of HPV-positive women having completed triage and treatment when necessary

    Proportion of women with positive primary screening who proceed to completing triage and treatment (when needed) in both study arms

    Time frame: Within 6 months after primary screening (HPV test)

  3. Number of HPV-positive women attending a follow-up visit at 12 months

    Proportion of HPV-positive women who attend the follow-up visit at 12 months after primary screening (HPV test) in both study arms

    Time frame: From 11 to 15 months after primary screening

  4. Number of women with different sociodemographic characteristics

    Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics among screened women in both study arms

    Time frame: At enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized IPD will be made available on an open-access repository alongside a data dictionary. All IPD used in the results publication will be published.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Upon result publication and for a minimum of 10 years.

Access criteria: The anonymized IPD will be made available on an open-access data repository.

Data sharing details ↗ · yareta.unige.ch

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in May 2026, 25 months.

Of 445 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 71. This study's 25 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 461 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2024
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
StartActual
Apr 13, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 21, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 2027
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06640075
Lead sponsor
Prof. Patrick Petignat
Collaborators
University Hospital, Geneva, Bafoussam Regional Hospital, Cameroon, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Responsible party
Prof. Patrick Petignat (Professor, University Hospital, Geneva) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Start date
Apr 13, 2024
Primary completion
May 21, 2026
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Patrick Petignat, PD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion