ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06166420CASAHOUpdated Jan 15, 2025

Home-based Cervical Cancer Screening Project

An interventional study of Experimental and Active comparator in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Prof. Patrick Petignat. Completed at 1 site in Cameroon. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-15.

Sponsored by Prof. Patrick Petignat · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered Dec 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,079
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cervical cancer is a public health problem in Cameroon.In 2020, the country had a crude incidence of 20.2 per 100 000 women for an incidence to mortality ratio of 0.65. As for now, the country does not have a national screening program to combat the disease. Only 6% of cameroonian women have once been screened for cervical cancer. In order to increase screening uptake so as to reach 70% recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), a home-based cervical cancer screening approach is proposed. The objective of our study is to compare two recruitment strategies for cervical cancer screening in rural Cameroon.

Read the detailed description

In 2018, a 5 years cervical cancer screening project called: "Promoting Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Prevention and Better Women's Health in Low- and Medium Resource Settings in the Health District of Dschang" was launched in the West Region of Cameroon. The study aimed at screening 2000 women per year following screen-triage-treatment as recommended by WHO in a 3T approach: Test with HPV self-sampling test, Triage by visual assessement of the cervix with acetic acid and lugol (VIA/VILI), Treatment with thermal ablation. Despite sensitization using communication information channels, uptake of the screening was below the target. In order to increase uptake of the screening, this study proposes a home-based strategy using Community Health Workers (CHW). Community Health Workers (CHW) are lay members of the community who carry out health promotion activities after training. In a randomised controlled cluster trial, two recruitment strategies for cervical cancer screening will be compared: in one arm a team made up of a CHW and a nurse will do door-to-door sensitization and propose home-based HPV self-sampling test to eligible women and in the other arm CHW will do door-to-door sensitization and issue invitation cards to eligible women for hospital-based HPV self-sampling test. This study is nested in ongoing cervical cancer screening project.

Primary objective: To compare completeness of full screening between two different recruitment strategies in rural area: counselling and home-based HPV self-sampling test versus counselling and hospital-based HPV self-sampling test.

Secondary objectives:

  • To determine the proportion of women who will carry out an HPV self-sampling test in both strategies within 3 months of sensitization.
  • To determine the proportion of HPV positive women who will undergo VIA/VILI in both arms within 3 months.
  • To assess the acceptability of home self-sampling HPV test and perception of single versus 2 visits approaches.
  • To determine predictors of non-adherence to care-seeking for HPV positive women.
  • To determine the number of pre-cancers and/or cancers diagnosed in both arms and their treatment.
  • To calculate the economic cost of both strategies.

Mixed method design, quantitative and qualitative informations will be collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer

Keywords

  • cervical cancer
  • human papillomavirus
  • screening
  • home-based
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,079 is above the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Prof. Patrick Petignat is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 30-49 years
  • Ability to understand study procedures and accepting voluntarily to participate by signing an form (ICF).

Non-inclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy at the time of screening
  • History of cervical cancer screening by HPV test of less than 5 years (for -negative women) or less than 3 years (for HIV positive women).
  • Intra-vaginal treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of cervical cancer (e.g. metrorrhagia, known pelvic mass)
  • Severe pre-existing medical conditions (e.g. advanced cancer, terminal renal failure)
  • Women who are not able to comply with the study protocol.
  • Previous hysterectomy
  • Known cervical cancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,079 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    home-based

    A team made up of a Community Health Worker (CHW) and a nurse will do door-to-door sensitization and propose to eligible women to undergo HPV self-sampling test at home. Samples collected will be taken by the nurse to the hospital for HPV testing . Participants will receive a phone call: disclosure of the HPV test's result will be by phone call for HPV-negative participants; HPV-positive participants will be invited to the hospital for disclosure of their results. At the hospital, HP-positive participants will undergo visual assessment of their cervix and treatment if needed.

    Other: Experimental

  • Active comparator
    hospital-based

    Community Health Worker (CHW) will do door-to-door sensitization and invite eligible women to attend cervical cancer screening at District Hospital Dschang. At the hospital they will do HPV self-sampling test. HPV-negative women will be advised to repeat the test after 5 years while HPV positive women will undergo visual assessment of the cervix with acetic acid and lugol (VIA/VILI) and treatment if needed.

    Other: Active comparator

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental

    Counseling on cervical cancer screening followed by home-based HPV self-sampling test proposal.

  • OtherActive comparator

    Counseling on cervical cancer screening followed invitation to screen at Dschang District Hospital.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number and percentage of participants who will complete full screening (HPV test +/- VIA/VILI +/- treatment when necessary) in both arms within 3 months of sensitization

    The number and percentage of participants who will do an HPV self test+/- VIA/VILI+/- treatment par study arm

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number and percentage of women who will do an HPV test within 3 months of sensitization per study arm

    The number and percentage of participants who will do an HPV test in each arm of the study.

    Time frame: 3 months from sensitization

  2. Number and percentage of participants once tested HPVpositive who will link to the pelvic exam for visual assessment and treatment (if needed) within 3 months.

    The number and percentage of participants once tested HPV positive who link to the hospital for visual assessment of the cervix and treatment if needed.

    Time frame: 3 months from HPV self sample collection

  3. Identify barriers and enablers to the home-HPV self-sampling test.

    Factors that prevent and motivate women to participate to a home-based HPV self-test.

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Identify barriers and enablers of linkage to VIA for HPV positive women

    Factors that prevent and motivate participants who did a home-based HPV self-test to link to the hospital for visual assesment of the cervix using acetic acid and lugol (VIA/VILI).

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Number of pre-cancers and/or cancers diagnosed in each study arm.

    The number of pre-cancers and cancers diagnosed per study arm.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Cost of each screening strategy.

    The cost of each strategy and make a cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dschang District Hospital
    Dschang, Menoua, Cameroon
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Anonymised data may be shared upon reasonable request at the end of the study period.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06166420
Lead sponsor
Prof. Patrick Petignat
Collaborators
Dschang District Hospital
Responsible party
Prof. Patrick Petignat (Professor, University Hospital, Geneva) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2023
Start date
Mar 27, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Jan 15, 2025

Study contacts

Patrick Petignat, Pr
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion