CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06627959Updated Dec 23, 2025

StatSeal vs Figure-of-Eight Suture for Vascular Closure in AF Ablation

An interventional study of Statseal and Figure of eight suture in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Vascular Access, sponsored by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-23.

Sponsored by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study, titled aims to compare two vascular closure techniques after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation is a common procedure used to treat AF, but after the procedure, It is important to close the access site in the blood vessel to prevent bleeding. This study will evaluate whether the StatSeal device, a haemostatic disc, can help patients recover more quickly compared to the traditional figure-of-eight suture technique.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether StatSeal reduces the time it takes for patients to start walking after the procedure (known as Time to Ambulation). Secondary objectives include comparing the time to complete haemostasis, discharge eligibility, incidence of adverse events, and patient comfort between the two techniques.

Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either the StatSeal device or the figure-of-eight suture after their AF ablation procedure. The study will recruit 160 participants across multiple hospital sites, with 80 participants in each group. Both techniques are standard methods, and participants will be closely monitored for safety throughout the study.

By comparing these two closure techniques, the study aims to improve the recovery process for patients undergoing AF ablation and provide evidence on which method leads to better outcomes and patient experiences.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
  • Vascular Access

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • vascular closure
  • Statseal
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients age >18
  • Elective catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using a 6 to 14 Fr inner diameter introducer sheath with a minimum of 1 and maximum of 3 femoral venous access sites
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active systemic or cutaneous infection, or inflammation in vicinity of the groin
  • Platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3
  • BMI > 45 kg/m2 or \< 20 kg/m2
  • Attempted femoral arterial access or inadvertent arterial puncture
  • Procedural complications that interfered with routine recovery, ambulation, or discharge times
  • Incorrect sheath placement
  • Intraprocedural bleeding or thrombotic complications
  • Access site-specific eligibility criteria to exclude problems with gaining access or location of sheath
  • History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, hypercoagulability, or thromboembolic events
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Statseal

    This group shall receive the StatSeal device for vascular closure

    Device: Statseal

  • Active comparator
    Figure of eight suture

    This group shall receive the figure of eight suture (attached to a three-way stopcock) for vascular closure

    Device: Figure of eight suture

Interventions

  • DeviceStatseal

    This is a vascular closure device which works independently of the clotting cascade to seal access sites

  • DeviceFigure of eight suture

    The figure of eight suture is commonly used for vascular access closure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to ambulation (TTA) after sheath removal

    Time to ambulation is defined as the elapsed time between removal of the final sheath and the moment when the patient can stand and walk 20 feet without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access site.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to haemostasis

    time elapsed between removal of the vascular sheath and first observed and confirmed venous haemostasis, for each access site

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Time to discharge eligibility

    time elapsed between removal of the final sheath and when the patient is eligible for hospital discharge based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Time to discharge

    time elapsed between removal of the final sheath and when the patient was discharged from the institution

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Incidence of major periprocedural adverse events

    defined as adverse events until hospital discharge requiring medical intervention.

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. Incidence of major adverse events

    Major adverse events are defined as complications requiring medical intervention or hospitalisation

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Incidence of minor adverse events

    Minor adverse events are defined as AEs not requiring medical intervention.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Comparison of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L

    Comparison of EuroQol 5-level EQ-5D score. The score is made up of two parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The first part covers five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension offers five response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems), from which an EQ-5D index score is calculated, ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The EQ-VAS assesses an individual's self-perceived health for the day on a vertical scale from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health), where participants mark their current health status.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre
    Basildon, Essex SS16 5NL, United Kingdom
  • East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Eastbourne, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
    Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06627959
Lead sponsor
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2024
Start date
Jan 3, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2025
Completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 23, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion