ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06624540EBP in NursingUpdated Dec 15, 2025

Effect of Implementing Evidence-based Practice and Nurse's Behavior Change on Quality of Care in Intensive Care Unit: Focus on Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in a Tertiary Hospital in Bangladesh

An interventional study of This is a pre- and post- quasi-experimental study. and Education with EBP in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) and Evidence Based Practice, sponsored by Hiroshima University. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-15.

Sponsored by Hiroshima University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Quality of care is crucial for preventing adverse events such as infection in the intensive care units (ICUs). The most common ICU-acquired infections include pneumonia such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), Central Line Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract in, Medical Device Related Pressure Ulcer (MDRPU) and Pressure Ulcer (PU). This study explores the patient outcome in ICU by examining the causes and prevalence of ICU-acquired infection. The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) to reduce infection and change the nurses practice (behavioral changes) to adhere with EBP based on simulation-based training.

General objective:

To evaluate the effect of EBP by using recent technologies-based equipment to prevent VAP and promote behavior change among nurses for better outcome of the patient in ICU.

Specific Objectives:

  1. To determine the incidence of adverse events (VAP rate, MDRPU rate, PU rate, CLABSI rate), length of stay and survival rate in ICU.
  2. To evaluate the effectiveness of EBP education by changing nurses' behavior and determine its impact on improving patient outcomes in the ICU.
  3. To evaluate the effectiveness of EBP including proper equipment use and changed nurses behavior acquired through the training for better patient outcome (VAP ratio) in the ICU.
  4. To examine the feasibility of evaluation process and outcomes and successful implementation of EBP in ICU.

Hypothesis:

It is hypothesize that implementing EBP in ICU, including new equipment use and nurses training, will improve patient outcome.

These research consist of three studies:

Phase 1: Incidence of adverse events (VAP rate, MDRPU rate, PU rate, CLABSI rate), length of stay and survival rate in ICU. The patients of General ICU will be followed up after admission up to discharge or death at ICU. The investigators use the study findings for our subsequent intervention study 3 as historical data.

Phase 2: A pre- and post- quasi-experimental study will be conducted for 6 months to evaluate the nurse's competency on EBP after getting 1-month EBP training. This study has 3 steps: (1) Pre-observation period to measure nurse's competency level for 2-month, (2) nurse's EBP training period with preparation for 1 month, and (3) post-implementation period to measure nurse's competency and implementation of EBP practice for 2 months. Study nurses will receive EBP training, EBP and proper equipment for patient management. The nurses will receive EBP education and training with necessary equipment, such as a close suction catheter, an endotracheal tube, a suction device, and a mouth care brush. In this study, use global standard equipment for the patients safety.

Phase 3: A pre- and post- quasi-experimental study will be implemented to evaluate the efficacy of EBP implementation. The investigators use new equipment and implement EBP for patients and assess the patient outcomes. The investigators compare the findings from study 1 (as historical data) with the data from this study 3.

The investigators will compare the VAP infection prevalence and patients' outcomes related to ICU-acquired infection between pre- and post- test phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
  • Evidence Based Practice

Keywords

  • evidence based practice
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
  • Nurses Knowledge
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 272 is above the median of 115 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Hiroshima University is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Study 2:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Who will be a registered nurse in Bangladesh.
  • Who will agree to participate in this study and the EBP training.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Who will not directly involve patient care in ICU.

Study 3:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Irrespective of age and sex, participant must be 18 years old.
  • Legal guardian of a patient consents to participation in the study
  • Intubated patients after admission.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Who stays less than 2 days at the GICU.
  • Who dies or is extubated within 2 days after admitted in the GICU.
  • ICU readmission.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
272 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: Phase 2: All Nurses in GICU; Phase 3: All patients admitted in the general GICU

    Nurses: All nurses who work at GICU of DMCH Patients: all patients who will admit at the assigned GICU during the study period of DMCH

    Behavioral: This is a pre- and post- quasi-experimental study. · Behavioral: Education with EBP

Interventions

  • BehavioralThis is a pre- and post- quasi-experimental study.

    We will use new equipment and implement EBP (VAP management) for patients by trained nurses (Phase 2) and check the outcome of the patients. We will compare our phase 1 findings for this study as historical data.

  • BehavioralEducation with EBP

    Phase 2: Nurse's EBP training ( VAP management), 2 hours lecture and 3 hours skill training for total 4 times in 1 month. Phase 3: Introduce new equipment necessary for EBP implementation for VAP management, and EBP-trained nurses implementation for VAP management.

    Also known as: Phase 2: Nurses EBP training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The nurse's skill performance is related to VAP checklist

    Nurses' skill performance related to VAP prevention measured using a researcher-developed 64-item observational checklist based on evidence-based practice guidelines. Unit of Measure: Total skill performance score (range 0-140), categorized as: * High: ≥112 (≥80%) * Moderate: 70-111 (50-79%) * Low: \<70 (\<50%)

    Time frame: Study 2: 6 months

  2. Incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)

    Number of new ventilator-associated pneumonia cases occurring in ICU patients during the study period. Unit of Measure: VAP cases per 1,000 ventilator days. Data will be collected: Patients' demographic data (age, sex, occupation etc.) Medical past and current history (diagnosis, treatment, medication, hospitalization). Reasons and date to be admitted to ICU. Treatment in ICU. Daily laboratory data taken in ICU. Daily biological data including vital signs. Results of patients' stay during ICU. Duration of ventilation Diagnosis of VAP

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. A nurse's motivation level will be measured

    A nurse's motivation level will be measured by the Motivation scale. . Total 12 items, and score ranges 1 lower motivation and 10 higher motivations.

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. Nurses' sustained implementation measured

    Nurses' sustained implementation measured by Nurses sustained implementation scale. The total item is 28, and 4-point liker scale. Scores ranges from 28 (no sustainability) to 112 (good sustainability).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Organizational readiness measured

    Organizational readiness measured by Organizational readiness scale. Total 03 items convergent validity (r = 0.42 - 0.72) for the correlations between the shortened and longer scales.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Nurses knowledge and practice related to VAP prevention measured.

    Measured by researcher modified nurses knowledge related to VAP prevention scale total 12 \& 6 items.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. VAP episode

    Number of new ventilator-associated pneumonia cases occurring in ICU patients during the study period.

    Time frame: 2 months

  6. Interval of VAP occurrence

    Number of days from date/time of ICU admission to date/time of first diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). If no VAP occurs, observation is censored at ICU discharge or death. Unit of Measure: Days (time-to-event) - report as median (IQR) and mean ± SD; consider Kaplan-Meier estimates for time-to-event.

    Time frame: 2 months

  7. Micro-organism link to VAP

    After diagnosis of CLABSI then identify what kind organism relate to CLABSI. Type and frequency of microorganisms identified in laboratory-confirmed CLABSI cases. Unit of Measure: Number of cases per microorganism

    Time frame: 2 months

  8. Mortality and morbidity rate

    Mortality and morbidity rate of ICU patients All-cause mortality among ICU patients during the study period. Unit of Measure: Percentage (%)。Occurrence of ICU-related adverse events (VAP). Unit of Measure: Number of patients with adverse events

    Time frame: 2 months

  9. Onset of VAP

    Classification of first VAP episode as early-onset or late-onset based on time from initiation of mechanical ventilation. Unit of Measure: Number and percentage (%) of patients with early-onset and late-onset VAP.

    Time frame: 2 months

  10. Length of stay ICU patients

    Average length of stay ICU patients. Mean length of stay in the intensive care unit for enrolled patients. Unit of Measure: Days (mean ± SD)

    Time frame: 2 months

  11. Survival rate in ICU

    Average survival rate of ICU. Data will be collected: Length of stay and survival rate. Proportion of enrolled patients alive at ICU discharge. Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of patients surviving to ICU discharge.

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akhter N, Zhou X, Elhabashy S, Huq KATME, Okamoto M, Latif MA, Babaita AO, Moriyama M. Effect of evidence-based education program with mentoring system for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia on nurses' competency to improve quality care for patients in the intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study in a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh. Front Public Health. 2026 Jan 9;13:1674223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1674223. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41584199 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be share due to personal confidentiality of the participants. When the data will be available and we will share the data according to the recommendations of the clinical trial registration and the requests of the journals.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06624540
Lead sponsor
Hiroshima University
Responsible party
Nahida Akhter (Principal Investigator, Ph.D Fellow, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan., Hiroshima University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 3, 2024
Start date
Oct 10, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 15, 2025

Study contacts

Nahida Akhter, Ph. D Fellow
Contact
nahida1789@gmail.com
+88-0192-547-8065
Michiko Moriyama, Ph. D
Contact
morimich@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
+81-82-257-5367

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion