ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06619366Updated Sep 2, 2025

The Impact of Coach-guided Risk Communication on the Risk of Major Depression

An interventional study of coach-guided personalized depression risk communication and depression risk information in Major Depressive Episode, Risk Reduction and Self Efficacy, sponsored by Dalhousie University. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-02.

Sponsored by Dalhousie University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Depression is a highly prevalent and disabling mental health problem. One way of preventing depression is to stop it before it happens through effective self-management. Working with potential users, a coach-guided, personalized depression risk communication tool (PDRC) was developed for sharing information about individualized depression risk, risk profile (risk factors present), potential risk reduction and evidence-based self-help strategies. It is anticipate that the PDRC will greatly motivate users to actively engage in self-help and help seeking, leading to a reduced risk of depression. The proposed study will recruit 500 male and 500 female adults who are at high risk of having depression across Canada, and randomly allocate them into the intervention and control groups. Participants will be followed for 12 months. The data of the trial will allow us to answer the questions: (1) Can the coach-guided PDRC reduce the risk of depression? (2) Does the intervention motivate people to actively engage in evidence-based self-help and help-seeking behaviors? (3) For whom the intervention works best? and (4) what are the costs and potential savings associated with the intervention? If successful, this project will offer a novel and effective tool for early prevention of major depression in the Canadian general population, help us understand how it works and the cost-effectiveness of implementing such a tool in the community from the economic perspective.

Read the detailed description

Background and importance:

Depression is a highly prevalent and disabling mental health problem. One cost-effective way of reducing the disease burden associated with depression is selective prevention, i.e., identifying individuals who are at high risk of depression, and intervene before it happens. The investigators developed the first sex-specific multivariable risk predictive algorithms (MVRPs) for major depressive episode (MDE) using data from over 10,000 Canadians. Using the MVRP as the foundation and working with future users, the investigators developed a coach-guided personalized depression risk communication tool (PDRC) for sharing information about individualized depression risk, risk profile (risk factors present), potential risk reduction and self-help strategies. It is anticipate that the coach-guided PDRC will greatly motivate users to actively engage in self-help and help-seeking, leading to a reduced risk of depression in the population.

Goals/Research Aims:

The aims of the proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) are to evaluate the impacts of the coach-guided PDRC on: (1) the risk of MDE at 12 months, (2) self-help and help-seeking behaviors, (3) the severity of depressive symptoms, and to examine (4) the moderation effect by self-efficacy and (5) the cost effectiveness of the coach-guided PDRC.

Methods/Expertise:

The proposed RCT has two arms: (1) intervention group, receiving the coach-guided PDRC; (2) control group, receiving personalized depression risk information. The study population are male and female adults in the community who are at high risk of having an MDE. Because the tools (MVRP) for estimating the risk of having an MDE are sex-specific, the recruitment and the randomization will be conducted in males and females separately. The investigators plan to recruit and follow 500 male and 500 female adults who are at high risk across Canada random digit dialing method and social media and poster advertisement.

The participants will be assessed at baseline, 3- and 12-month to ascertain short-term and mid-term effects. Data will be analyzed in males and females, separately, controlling for the effects of covariates which include gender and gender role related variables. The investigators will examine how the intervention influences the changes in self-help and help seeking behaviors and in depressive symptoms, whether the intervention effect differ by levels of self-efficacy, and if the economic gain exceeds program-related cost. Following the CONSORT guidelines, the investigators will perform both complete case and intent-to-treat analyses based on randomization. The research team has the needed expertise for conducting the proposed RCT, including psychiatry, epidemiology, biostatistics, health economics, risk communication and large RCTs.

The expected outcomes:

In aim 1, it is expected that participants who receive the coach-guided PDRC will have a significantly lower risk of developing MDE over 12 months than those in the control group. It is expected that the intervention will significantly enhance participants' self-help and help-seeking behaviors (aim 2) and reduce depressive symptoms (aim 3). In aim 4, it is expected to observe that the intervention effect is greater in those with higher level of self-efficacy. Finally, the intervention will achieve preferable cost and saving ratio (aim 5). If successful, this coach-guided PDRC can be a novel and cost-effective program for selective prevention of depression in the Canadian general population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Episode
  • Risk Reduction
  • Self Efficacy

Keywords

  • major depressive episode
  • risk communication
  • coach-guided
  • self-help
03

In context

Risk Reduction Behavior

291 studies on the registry are indexed under Risk Reduction Behavior; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 201 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Risk Reduction Behavior.

Browse Risk Reduction Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Dalhousie University is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • no MDE at baseline, or full remission for 2 months for those who had a past MDE (see below the question).
  • Aged 18 and 65 years.
  • At high risk of MDE based on the depression risk calculators (predicted risk of 6.5%+ for males and 11.2%+ for females), which represent the top two deciles of male and female populations in Canada.
  • Agreement to be contacted for follow-up assessments, and
  • no language barriers to English or French

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

individuals who

  • cannot provide ,
  • do not agree to be followed,
  • cannot communicate in English and French, or
  • report suicide behaviors (score >0 on item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalized depression risk communication

    The intervention has two integrated components: PDRC and coach-guidance. The PDRC has five sections. The PDRC will be sent to participants by email/mail within two days after the baseline and follow-up assessments. The coach will contact the participant within a week after the PDRC is provided by telephone or video conference, depending on participants' preference. The role of the coach is to assist the participant in understanding and interpreting the PDRC, answering their questions, and helping identify self-help strategies that are feasible for the participant; they do not provide psychotherapy. The coaching session will follow the four processes of motivational interview.

    Other: coach-guided personalized depression risk communication

  • Active comparator
    Placebo control

    Participants in the control group will receive their individualized depression risk information. Receiving individualized depression risk information is considered as "control" because: (1) our previous RCT showed that receiving individualized depression risk information caused no psychological harm and was effective in reducing distress and improving function; (2) Receiving depression risk information was used as control in our pilot study; (3) The pilot study suggested that the coach-guided PDRC may be more effective than receiving depression risk information alone.

    Other: depression risk information

Interventions

  • Othercoach-guided personalized depression risk communication

    see information in arm description.

  • Otherdepression risk information

    see information in arm description.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of major depressive episode cases

    The proportion of new onset major depressive episode cases measured by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

    Time frame: 12 months after randomization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive symptom score

    depressive symptom score measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The score ranges between 0 and 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depression.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  2. change in self-help behaviors

    changes in self-help behavioral score measured by the Self-management Strategy Use Scale (SSUS). The SSUS assesses the frequency of using each of the 14 evidence-based self-help strategies. Frequency of use is rated on a 5-category scale. The score ranges between 14 and 70. A higher score indicates more self-help actions.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  3. The percentage of mental health service use

    The percentage of reported use of main stream mental health services

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. anxiety symptom score

    anxiety symptom score measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. The score ranges from 0 to 21. A higher score indicates more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  2. Cost reduction

    Sick leave and productivity measured by Health and Work Performance Questionnaire which collects information about number of sick leave days and presenteeism in the past 30 days. The number of sick leave days will be converted into monetary figure to represent cost.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Medicine
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1V7, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang J, Feng C, Hajizadeh M, Lesage A. The impact of a coach-guided personalized depression risk communication program on the risk of major depressive episode: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06393-9. PubMed 39696180 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Depending on the nature of request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06619366
Lead sponsor
Dalhousie University
Responsible party
JianLi Wang (Professor, Dalhousie University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
Feb 10, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2025

Study contacts

Jianli Wang, PhD
Contact
jianli.wang@dal.ca
902-473-6684
JianLi Wang, PhD
principal investigator · Dalhousie University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion