ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06615115Updated Feb 11, 2025

The Effect of Different Types of Focus Instructions in Parkinson's Rehabilitation

An interventional study of Exercise in Parkinson Disease, Cognitive Deficit in Attention and Feedback, Psychological, sponsored by Bahçeşehir University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 50 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-11.

Sponsored by Bahçeşehir University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Parkinson's disease is the most common progressive neurodegenerative movement disorder. Common movement impairments in Parkinson's include balance and walking difficulties. These impairments lead to falls, increased levels of functional dependency, and a decrease in quality of life. Exercise in Parkinson's patients improves their functional symptoms in daily life, enhancing both motor and non-motor skills, and consequently increases their quality of life. Recently, various additional methods have been developed to increase the effectiveness of exercise in Parkinson's rehabilitation and to contribute to motor skills. Focus of attention instructions are fundamental concepts in motor function learning. External focus of attention has been shown to facilitate motor function development, reduce postural instability, and improve dual-task walking by being easier to remember. In Parkinson's patients who experience freezing phenomena, internal focus of attention instructions enhance walking stability and movement control, thereby reducing the risk of falls. However, there are no studies on the combined focus of attention instructions in Parkinson's patients. This study is designed as a randomized controlled, single-blind, prospective trial to examine the effects of a combination of internal and external focus of attention instructions on walking, balance parameters, quality of life, and patient satisfaction levels, taking into account the presence of freezing phenomena in Parkinson's patients.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common progressive neurodegenerative movement disorder. Common movement impairments in Parkinson's include balance and walking difficulties. These impairments lead to falls, increased levels of functional dependency, and a decrease in quality of life. Such deficits are associated with the acquisition of motor function skills. Although PD patients are open to learning, they experience challenges with motor planning. Therefore, individuals with PD may require additional training, sensory input, and motor education for the permanence and ease of motor skill acquisition.

The difficulties PD patients face with complex commands indicate that they can learn in a feedforward manner, but they show inconsistencies in the use of automatic functions. This inconsistency results in challenges in adapting to variable situations and performing complex activities (like balance and walking). Exercise in Parkinson's patients improves their functional symptoms in daily life, enhancing both motor and non-motor skills, and consequently increasing their quality of life. Recently, various additional methods have been developed to enhance the effectiveness of exercise in Parkinson's rehabilitation and to contribute to motor skills. One commonly used method to address deficits in motor behavior is motor learning activities, which involve repetitive movements and ensure continuity.

Many studies have shown that the concept of focus of attention contributes to the efficiency and learning of various motor functions, particularly balance. Individuals with Parkinson's are highly receptive to external stimuli, so a focus-based strategy during balance and walking training can improve these skills. Focus of attention instructions are fundamental concepts in motor function learning. External focus of attention facilitates motor function development, reduces postural instability, and improves dual-task walking. In Parkinson's patients who experience freezing phenomena, internal focus of attention instructions enhance walking stability and movement control, thereby reducing the risk of falls. However, there are no studies on the combined focus of attention instructions in Parkinson's patients.

This study is designed as a randomized controlled, single-blind, prospective trial to examine the effects of a combination of internal and external focus of attention instructions on walking, balance parameters, quality of life, and patient satisfaction levels, considering the presence of freezing phenomena in Parkinson's patients. Approximately 48 individuals with Parkinson's disease without freezing phenomena will participate in an exercise program for six weeks, three days a week. Participants will be randomized into a combined focus group, an external focus group, and a control group. Assessments will be repeated at the beginning and end of the six-week exercise program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Cognitive Deficit in Attention
  • Feedback, Psychological
  • Gait, Festinating
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,583 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,097 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is above the median of 40 across 3,365 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Bahçeşehir University is the lead sponsor of 121 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hoehn and Yahr Stage II or III
  • Individuals between the ages of 50 and 70 who can walk independently but have balance disorders
  • Having a score between 21-56 on the Berg Balance Scale
  • Having a score between 24-30 on the Mini Mental State Test
  • Having agreed to participate in the study (Not having a freezing phenomenon)
  • Being in the Medication-on period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having malignancy and metabolic diseases
  • Having had Cerebrovascular Accident before
  • Other neurological disease history
  • Presence of cognitive problems
  • Presence of visual or hearing disorders
  • Presence of deep brain pacemaker
  • Presence of freezing phenomenon (persons with Freezing of Gait Questionnaire FOG-Q above zero)
  • Presence of dyskinesia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group1: Exercises with External Attention Focus Instructions

    Throughout the descriped exercise program, the physiotherapist will guide the participants using only external focus of attention instructions. Example: Go over the red block. (10 rounds )

    Other: Exercise

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Exercises with Combined Attention Focus Instructions

    The exercise program given to the External Focus of Attention group will also be administered to this group. While guiding the exercises, the physiotherapist will use a combination of both external and internal focus of attention instructions to direct the participants. Example: Pass over the red block by pulling your knees up as high as you can.

    Other: Exercise

  • Experimental
    Grup 3: Exercises with no instructions (Control Group)

    The same exercise program given to the other groups will also be administered to this group but no instruction will be given to this group. Example: Take 10 turn around the track, passing over the blocks

    Other: Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherExercise

    All participants will perform a total body stretching exercise for 10 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of obstacle course navigation, 10 minutes of balance training (including tandem walking, balance board exercises, single-leg balance, and two-legged reaching exercises), and will conclude with 10 minutes of strength training exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale

    This is a 14-item scale that measures the ability to maintain balance during dynamic tasks. It is rated on a scale of 0 to 4 points, with a maximum total score of 56. As the total score decreases, the risk of falling increases. 0 to 20 points: Indicates that the individual is dependent on a wheelchair and has a 100% risk of falling. 21 to 40 points: Suggests that the individual has a moderate risk of falling and may be able to walk with assistance. 41 to 56 points: Indicates that the individual can ambulate independently with a low risk of falling.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks after the baseline

  2. Time Up and Go Dual Task

    The test assesses balance, walking, and functionality during activities. The TUG-Dual Task evaluates walking abilities and attention management by asking participants to solve a simple math problem or perform another cognitive task while walking. Patients will be assessed for functionality, walking speeds, and balance evaluations. If the duration lasts more than 12 seconds, there is a risk of falling.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks after the baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)

    The PDQ-39 is a PD specific health status questionnaire comprising 39 items. Respondents are requested to affirm one of five ordered response categories according to how often, due to their PD, they have experienced the problem defined by each item. Items are grouped into eight scales that are scored by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100 (100¼more health problems).

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks after the baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Likert Scale Questionnaire

    Likert scale is a measurement tool that combines multiple Likert-type questions. It is defined as the creation of two or more Likert-type questions to address a single research problem, and using the average values of these questions during the analysis phase. The aim is to determine individuals' average attitudes on these topics based on the combined values of all questions. To determine the scope of the patient's treatment, 5 questions and a high score of 10 are evaluated. The highest score is 50, indicating that the person is satisfied with the treatment; as the score decreases, satisfaction with the treatment decreases.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks after the baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06615115
Responsible party
Pelin Pişirici (Assistant Professor, PT, PhD, Bahçeşehir University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 26, 2024
Start date
Jan 30, 2025
Primary completion
May 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 11, 2025

Study contacts

Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD
Contact
pelinpisirici@gmail.com
05055016076
Selen Gür Özmen, MD
Contact
selen.gur.ozmen@bau.edu.tr
05323941011
Leyla Koçak, PT
principal investigator · Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy
Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD
study director · Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion