ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06603519Updated May 5, 2026

Impact of Dietary Intervention on Inflammation and Microbiome Composition Post-Colonoscopy

An interventional study of Modified Plant-Based Mediterranean Diet in Colorectal Polyp, Inflammation and Dietary Intervention, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Primary conditionColorectal NeoplasmsRegistry: InflammationReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Inflammation — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Colorectal Neoplasms
Why
  1. Inflammation is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Colorectal Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the impact of various healthy diets, specifically a modified plant-based Mediterranean diet, on the gut microbiome and overall well-being post-colonoscopy. The investigators hypothesize that certain diets can positively influence gut bacteria, reducing inflammation and enhancing metabolic signals.

To explore this, they will utilize metagenomic testing on stool samples to analyze the DNA of gut microorganisms. Additionally, they will conduct immune profiling on serum samples and perform metabolomic analysis to comprehensively evaluate the diet-induced changes in immune response and metabolic pathways. This multi-faceted approach will help them understand how dietary changes affect the composition and function of the gut microbiome, immune function, and overall metabolism.

Read the detailed description

An altered intestinal gut microbiota, i.e. dysbiosis, has been associated with the development of intestinal diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer (CRC), and metabolic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular disease. Metagenomic analyses have revealed microbial biomarkers and ecological signatures in the fecal microbiome of CRC patients, correlating with chronic inflammation and gut dysbiosis. These factors have demonstrated prognostic relevance for CRC akin to other precursors, including conventional adenoma and serrated polyps.

Bowel lavage, a standard practice for facilitating colonoscopies, may affect the interaction between gut microbes and intestinal phenotypes. Standard bowel preparations have immediate impacts on gut microbiota composition, with alterations typically lasting around 14 days before a partial return to baseline. These changes in gut microbial diversity likely contribute to minor colonoscopy complications such as abdominal discomfort, bloating, diarrhea, and constipation during the recovery period.

Post-bowel lavage dietary intervention could potentially minimize lavage-associated side effects by promoting microbial diversity restoration and systemic inflammation reduction. In a previous mouse study, the investigators discovered that the Standard American Diet (SAD) led to the proliferation of opportunistic pathogens following surgical lavage. This change in microbial composition was linked to increased systemic inflammation and a higher incidence of surgical complications. Additionally, they observed that a high-fiber, low-saturated-fat diet-like a whole food, plant-based (WFPB), Med/DASH diet, and modified Mediterranean diet-can reverse this inflammatory phenotype.

However, there is a lack of interventional trials investigating the health benefits of specific dietary interventions following bowel lavage. Therefore, the investigators propose a human intervention study to assess if daily consumption of a high-fiber diet after colonoscopy will alter the intestinal microbiota, decrease inflammation, and improve digestive health.

This will be a controlled intervention study involving 30 subjects who will be enrolled on a rolling basis as they are identified during the recruitment period. The study begins with an initial visit at Week 1, where blood is collected for immune profiling and metabolomics, and participants start weekly stool collection using the S-Wipe method. At Week 2, a GutLab device is installed in participants' homes for daily stool collection. The colonoscopy occurs at Week 4, followed by a 2-week high-fiber diet provided by Thistle. Throughout the study, blood draws (6 mL) are performed at Weeks 1, 4, 6, and 8, while stool samples are collected weekly via S-Wipe and daily via GutLab. Participants log their food intake with a dietitian three times per week during Weeks 3, 5, and 7, and body composition measurements are taken before the colonoscopy and at the final visit. The study aims to quantify how dietary intervention affects post-lavage microbiome, metabolome, and immune response through analysis of blood and stool samples. Optional follow-ups at 1, 3, and 5 years will assess polyp recurrence. This design enables a comprehensive assessment of a high-fiber diet's impact on intestinal microbiota, inflammation, and digestive health in individuals with a history of polyps undergoing colonoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Polyp
  • Inflammation
  • Dietary Intervention
  • Microbiota
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Metabolomics

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dietary Intervention
  • Inflammation
  • Microbiome
  • Polyps
  • Colonoscopy
  • Gut Health
  • Nutrition
  • Human Microbiome
  • Fecal Metabolomics
  • Serum Metabolomics
  • Metabolomics Analysis
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms Reclassified

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 980 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 71 (63%) have results posted.

Compared within Colorectal Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Inflammation. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

1. Due for 2nd or 3rd colonoscopy with prior diagnosis of tubular, villous, or serrated polyps but no current diagnosis of CRC.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide and engage in informed consent procedures.
  2. Participants who suffer from allergic reactions to, or are unwilling to consume, any components of the dietary intervention.
  3. Pregnant
  4. Serious illness and in hospice or palliative care for terminal disease
  5. Swallowing issues, including self-reported difficulty tolerating solids or liquids.
  6. Active antibiotics use for an ongoing acute infection.
  7. Any disorder, unwillingness, or inability not covered by any other exclusion criteria which, in the investigator's and/or team's opinion jeopardizes the safety of the participant or others or would interfere with adherence to the protocol.
  8. Participants who plan to relocate to an area not served by UCSD or travel plans that do not permit completion of the study.
  9. Possible ethanol (alcohol) use disorder defined by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of >15

    Uncontrolled disease states:

  10. Hyper-tension >160/100mmHg
  11. Exacerbation of underlying gastrointestinal disease, including chronic inflammatory bowel disease or other malabsorptive disorders
  12. Decompensated cirrhosis
  13. Previously diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus with >9% at screening
  14. Newly diagnosed diabetes within the past three months, or HbA1c >6.5% at screening in a person not previously diagnosed with diabetes.
  15. Participants with a history of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis
  16. Active infectious diseases (e.g., active tuberculosis \< 3 months from symptom onset or positive test, COVID \< 1 month from symptom onset or positive test)
  17. Participants who require dietary restrictions due to a medical condition or are on a prescribed diet for underlying chronic diseases.
  18. Participants with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes on insulin
  19. Participants aged 2: 75 years with Type 2 diabetes taking prescribed medications that can cause hypoglycemia (e.g., sulfonylureas, glinides), or on a prescribed diet
  20. Hospitalization for a chronic disease (e.g., congestive heart failure, stroke) within the past three months
  21. Requiring transfusions/apheresis during study period
  22. Participants with a current diagnosis of, or who have received treatment for, bulimia or anorexia nervosa within the past 3 years
  23. Participants with major psychiatric disorders, including major depression, schizophrenia, or psychosis, who have been hospitalized in the past six (6) months or are currently enrolled in treatment programs.
  24. \<9.5 g/dL at screening
  25. Myocardial infarction, invasive cardiac procedure, participation in a cardiac or acute rehabilitation programs, , or unstable arrhythmias within the past 3 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dietary Intervention Group

    Participants in this arm will follow a modified plant-based Mediterranean diet following their colonoscopies. The dietary intervention aims to reduce inflammation and improve gut microbiome composition. Participants' gut bacteria and overall health will be monitored through blood and stool sample collections, focusing on inflammation reduction and metabolic health improvement.

    Dietary Supplement: Modified Plant-Based Mediterranean Diet

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementModified Plant-Based Mediterranean Diet

    Two-week dietary intervention after the participants' scheduled colonoscopy consisting of vegetarian high-fiber meals. These meals are designed to provide a substantial intake of dietary fiber through a variety of plant-based foods, including whole grains, legumes, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds. Meals will be delivered bi-weekly, and compliance will be monitored through regular check-ins with a study dietitian.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Inflammatory Markers and Microbial Metabolites

    Measure changes in circulating inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10) and microbial metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate) at four time-points (Weeks 1, 4, 6, and 8) following bowel lavage and adherence to a modified plant-based Mediterranean diet. Gastrointestinal discomfort will be tracked using patient-reported outcome tools, with comparisons to baseline and across all time points.

    Time frame: 4 time-points throughout the study: Weeks 1, 4, 6, and 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Gut Microbiome Composition and Opportunistic Pathogen Abundance

    Measure changes in the gut microbiome composition, including alpha diversity (e.g., Shannon index, Simpson index) and beta diversity (e.g., Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, UniFrac distances), along with the abundance of opportunistic pathogens (e.g., Enterococcus faecalis). Associations will be drawn between microbial diversity and composition, colonoscopy outcomes, circulating immune/metabolite markers, and reported gastrointestinal discomfort. Daily fecal samples will undergo metagenomic sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to quantify these metrics over 7 weeks.

    Time frame: 7 Weeks of fecal sampling: Weeks 2-8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute
    San Diego, California 92037, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 20 months after the start.

Of 898 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 955 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2024
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
StartActual
Mar 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
May 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06603519
Collaborators
Seerave Foundation
Responsible party
Jack Gilbert (Professor, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 4, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion