ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06593418Updated Apr 20, 2026

Cardiac Radioablation for VT

An interventional study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Ventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Corewell Health East. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-20.

Sponsored by Corewell Health East · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 154 studies in Tachycardia, Ventricular with a site in United States — 34 open to participants now, 40 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Tachycardia, Ventricular · United States.

Planned enrollment
70th of 107
24 · median 60
Started
2026
with 6 others
No phase
68 of 154
18 open now
Primary completion
2028-01
later than 25 of 39 live
Registered
140th of 154
by date

Among the 154 studies in Tachycardia, Ventricular with a site in United States, this one is the 70th largest by planned enrollment of the 107 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2026, is one of 68 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 25 of the 39 other live ones, and was the 140th registered.

Tachycardia, Ventricular

451 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular; 120 are open to participants now.

Browse Tachycardia, Ventricular studies →

Open to participants now

34 of the 154 studies in Tachycardia, Ventricular with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

29 more — sign in →

All 34 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 85 Tachycardia, Ventricular studies recruiting now, 66 (78%) set no upper age limit and 1 (1%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 154 studies in Tachycardia, Ventricular with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) .

Read the detailed description

This voluntary study is designed to learn what is the minimum dose of radiation therapy (RT) needed to successfully reduce the incidence of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) by half. Additionally, the study will examine the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR). Radiation therapy, given in a highly focused single dose to a portion of the heart, by a non-invasive method, has been found to change the electrical conduction of the heart. This will be done with the goal of reducing the number of episodes of VT in people where invasive thermal (heat) ablation and heart medications have not completely worked.

Cardiac radioablation has been done at other institutions using a dose of RT that may be higher than needed to obtain the benefit of fewer episodes of VT. We are trying to learn if lower doses of RT will work to reduce VT. Cardiac radioablation is currently offered at a number of institutions worldwide at the standard dose of 25 Gray, or Gy (the unit of dose for radiation therapy) given in a single treatment. This study is testing if lower doses of RT are just as effective as 25 Gy. The doses being tested are 15 Gy (the dose that we will start at), 20 Gy and 25 Gy (if the lower doses are found not to work well).

Potential participants will be identified by their cardiologist. Electroanatomic mapping will have already been obtained as part of routine care. A Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI will be performed (if a new one is necessary) and a Radiation Therapy Simulation. Commercial RT software will be used to fuse the DE CMR and the RT Simulation treatment planning CT scan. The cardiologist and radiation oncologist will define the Gross Target Volume and the expansions for the Clinical and Planning Target Volumes. These volume definitions will be used by the Radiation Oncology Dosimetrist. The dose will be determined in standard 3+3 Phase I fashion. Dose escalation will proceed in a standard 3 + 3 Phase I fashion according to both dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and efficacy. Escalation will stop when there is efficacy 50% or greater without severe DLT or when there is severe DLT (2+ of 3 or 6 with DLT as per traditional 3 + 3 Phase I design). The dose will not be escalated within a single patient.

When the minimum effective dose (MED) or maximum tolerable dose (MTD) is determined, further accrual will occur at that dose level until 12 patients are accrued and observed for 14 weeks (6 week blanking and 8 week (56 day) evaluation).

DLT is defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4 - 5 toxicity (CTCAE v.5) determined to be treatment related (possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment) occurring within 14 weeks after treatment. DLT's occurring after the 14-week observation period may still impact on dose escalation.

Efficacy is defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.

Treatment will be given using standard SBRT technique. The week 14 assessment will be used to determine efficacy (defined as a 50% of higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6 week post-treatment blanking period).

Following determination of the study dose in the Phase I portion of the study, a Phase II portion will be performed until a total of 12 patients are accrued at the recommended dose.

03

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Myocardial Infarction
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must be 18 years or older.
  • Automatic implanted cardiac defibrillator present.
  • VT is monomorphic with at least two episodes of VT within an eight week (56 day) period as recorded by an AICD or heart failure related to VT or VT storm.
  • ≥20%.
  • At least one previous cardiac ablation for VT.
  • VT despite antiarrhythmic medications.
  • Likely to live for 12 months in the absence of VT.
  • AICD in a position in the chest RT to be given without direct radiation.
  • Woman of reproductive age must ensure that she won't become pregnant or breastfeed at the time of RT.
  • The participant has no to a Cardiac MRI as per routine Cardiology practice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Class IV heart failure
  • Abandoned leads.
  • Prior radiation therapy to the chest or upper abdomen.
  • Interstitial lung disease.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiation Therapy at 15 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia

    Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 15 Gy

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

  • Experimental
    Radiation Therapy at 20 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia

    Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 20 Gy

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

  • Experimental
    Radiation Therapy at 25 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia

    Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 25 Gy

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Interventions

  • RadiationStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

    Stereotactic body radiation therapy, which delivers precise, high-dose radiation non-invasively to generate thermal scarring to myocardial targets causing VT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation

    Change in the number of episodes of VT over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days post treatment (following the 6 week post-treatment blanking period). A negative number represents a reduction in episodes after treatment (improved function) and a positive number represents an increase in episodes after treatment (worsened function).

    Time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)

  2. Dose limiting toxicity

    Number of participants who had dose limiting toxicity defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4-5 toxicity determined to be treatment-related.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of ablation using target volume definition with Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR)

    Number of participants who had successful cardiac radioablation using target volume definition DE-CMR, defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.

    Time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jan 2028, 18 months later.

Of 85 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tachycardia, Ventricular, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 125 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2024
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
StartEst.
Jul 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 2028
Last update
Apr 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06593418
Lead sponsor
Corewell Health East
Responsible party
John Robertson, MD (Clinical Director, Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health East) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 20, 2026

Study contacts

John Roberston, MD
Contact
john.robertson@corewellhealth.org
248-551-7038
Kristen Grant, RN
Contact
kristen.grant@corewellhealth.org
248-551-0439
John Robertson, MD
principal investigator · Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion