An interventional study of Mentoring program and Control (placebo) group in Social Stigma, sponsored by Universidad del Desarrollo. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.
Sponsored by Universidad del Desarrollo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Stigma towards people with mental health problems is a serious public health problem that limits access to treatment and social participation, in addition to being considered the main barrier to inclusion and quality of health care. This stigma also affects students and health professionals, impacting the quality of care and help seeking in mental health. In this context, it is necessary to develop innovative and effective interventions among university students to reduce this stigma and promote an inclusive and recovery-based approach.
The aim of the present research project is to analyze the effect of a mentoring program on levels of stigma and mental health help-seeking intention in psychology and nursing students. This three-session mentoring program is based on experiential learning and has been validated and adapted to our country. The mentors, professionals with lived experience in mental health, will provide knowledge and experiences to the students through direct contact sessions in the classroom, focusing especially on the processes of recovery and self-determination.
Research question: What is the effect of a mentoring program on levels of stigma and mental health help-seeking intention in health care students?
Within the dependent variables of the study are the measurement of levels of stigma and mental health help-seeking intention in students. The independent variables will be the type of group (experimental and control), age, gender and career.
Methodology: Quantitative study, including the participation of health students in the experimental and control groups. The sample size was determined using the G*Power software. After approval by the institutional ethics committee and signature of the informed consent of the participants, the mentoring program will be implemented in the classroom. For this purpose, the levels of stigma and intention to seek mental health help in both groups will be measured using nationally and internationally validated instruments, before, after and at 4 weeks. Data analysis will be performed using a mixed ANOVA model to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes between the two groups.
The present study will provide valuable evidence on the effectiveness of mentoring-based interventions in reducing stigma in health care students, a key group in the future provision of care for people with mental health problems. The results will also lay the groundwork for larger-scale studies to assess the impact of the intervention in other groups and settings, with the potential to significantly improve the quality of care and well-being of patients and their families.
266 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Stigma; 66 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 102 is below the median of 139 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Social Stigma.
Browse Social Stigma studies →Universidad del Desarrollo is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
No intervention group
Behavioral: Control (placebo) group
Intervention group. In detail, the intervention has a total of 3 participatory sessions via videoconference, with an average duration of 90 minutes per session, with a maximum number of 3 to 4 students per mentor. Each session is accompanied by a reflective log of the activities and observations made by the students of an evaluated nature, as well as reading prior to session n°1 and n°2. In addition, the anonymous evaluation of the level of stigma before and after the implementation, both in the group of students and mentors, is included, as well as a follow-up of the measurements regarding these evaluations. At the professional level, a 6-hour pedagogical intervention focused on stigma reduction for the training of health students towards people with psychiatric illnesses will be provided to all health professionals involved, with a certificate of participation delivered at the end of the sessions. The sessions must have minimum material implements such as an equipped classroom, proj
Behavioral: Mentoring program
This three-session mentoring program is based on experiential learning and has been validated and adapted to our country. The mentors, professionals with lived experience in mental health, will provide knowledge and experiences to the students through direct contact sessions in the classroom, focusing especially on the processes of recovery and self-determination.
This group will not receive any intervention. However, they will be invited to participate in stigma education after the study is completed.
Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27)
This 27-item, 9-factor instrument has been widely used to measure levels of stigma towards people with mental health problems in the general population and university students nationally and globally. It presents a vignette of a case of a person diagnosed with schizophrenia, where various stereotypes, prejudices and behaviors around him are assessed and measured (anger, pity, dangerousness, fear, avoidance, guilt, segregation and coercion). The instrument uses a 9-point Likert-type response scale, where higher scores represent higher levels of stigma. Specifically, its Spanish version has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for use in a university population (Saavedra et al., 2021).
Time frame: At the time of recruitment, immediately after the end of the study and the 4-week follow-up.
Mental Help Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS)
A 3-item instrument designed to measure respondents\' intention to seek help from a mental health professional if one were to have a mental health problem (Hamer \& Spiker, 2018). The response scale is a 7-point Likert-type, where a higher score indicates a greater intention to seek help. This instrument has been shown to possess psychometric properties suitable for use with college students, in addition to possessing evidence of predictive validity (Hamer \& Spiker, 2018).
Time frame: At the time of recruitment, immediately after the end of the study and the 4-week follow-up.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Aug 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 4 months later.
Of 162 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Social Stigma, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 4 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 164 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad del Desarrollo