CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06588907Updated Dec 27, 2024

Pain Palliation in Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department

An interventional study of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Ketamine in Forearm Fracture, Radius Fractures and Ulnar Fracture, sponsored by Ankara Etlik City Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-27.

Sponsored by Ankara Etlik City Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim is to evaluate the success of reduction procedures and pain palliation in patients with forearm fractures undergoing reduction under procedural sedation-analgesia (PSA) and ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular nerve block (ICB) in the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

Forearm fractures are among the most frequent reasons for adults to visit the emergency department. These fractures cause significant pain both due to the fracture itself and during the reduction process. Pain management in emergency departments (ED) is crucial. Therefore, multimodal approaches are available to reduce or eliminate pain during the reduction process. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success and pain palliation of the reduction process with procedural sedation-analgesia (PSA) and with reduction under ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular nerve block (ICB) in patients with forearm fractures. The secondary aim is to compare patient comfort, physician comfort, side effects, length of stay in the emergency department, and the need for painkillers after discharge between these two procedures, and to identify the most suitable method. This study aims to contribute to practical applications in order to provide optimal pain control in patients with forearm fractures in emergency departments.

Patients' pain levels at arrival, pre-reduction procedure, and post-reduction procedure will be recorded using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).The success of the reduction procedure, whether further reduction attempts were necessary, and findings from post-reduction control X-rays (radial height, radial tilt, and volar tilt) will be noted and evaluated by orthopedic physicians.

02

Conditions studied

  • Forearm Fracture
  • Radius Fractures
  • Ulnar Fracture

Keywords

  • Procedural sedation-analgesia
  • infraclavicular nerve block
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Etlik City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years and older,
  • Diagnosed with forearm fracture using standard radiography,
  • Hemodynamically stable individuals,
  • Without vascular or nerve injury,
  • Without infection in the skin or tissues where the needle will pass,
  • Able to provide written and verbal consent and are capable of giving consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with allergies to drugs used for sedoanalgesia and peripheral nerve blockade,
  • Those who are hemodynamically unstable,
  • Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification 3-4 will not be included in the group for whom PSA will be applied,
  • Patients with coagulopathy, liver, or kidney failure,
  • Patients with opioid, alcohol, or substance dependency,
  • Those with skin infections or open wounds in the area where local anesthetic will be administered,
  • Pregnant or suspected pregnant individuals,
  • Those who do not provide written and verbal consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group P

    Reduction will be performed under procedural sedation analgesia (PSA)

    Drug: Ketamine

  • Active comparator
    Group B

    Reduction will be performed under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular nerve block (ICB).

    Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine Hydrochloride

    After preparing the infraclavicular block site, a 22-gauge needle, guided by ultrasound, will be placed in the 6-7 o'clock position in the same plane as the ultrasound probe. Subsequently, lateral, medial, and posterior cords described as hypoechoic nerve fascicles within hyperechoic structures will be identified. Initially, 2 mL of saline will be administered to confirm proper spread. Once confirmed, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (prepared by diluting 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 10 mL of normal saline) will be injected in fractional doses with intermittent negative aspiration. Fifteen minutes after this procedure, anesthesia depth will be assessed using a cold-hot test, followed by reduction and application of the cast.

    Also known as: Infraclavicular nerve block (ICB)

  • DrugKetamine

    Until the recovery period, patients will be closely monitored by an experienced doctor or nurse during sedation. Emergency equipment will be readily available in case of any complications. The following protocol will be used for procedural sedation-analgesia (PSA): Ketamine will be administered intravenously at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg. Patients with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores above 5 may receive additional doses of 0.25-1 mg/kg, repeated every 5 to 10 minutes as needed.

    Also known as: procedural sedation-analgesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of patients' pain levels according to the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) after the applied protocols.

    Pain levels at arrival, pre-reduction procedure, and post-reduction procedure will be recorded using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: 1. Pain level at the 1. minute upon presentation to the emergency room. 2. Pain level after the implementation of the protocols, i.e. 1 hour later. 3. Pain level 24 hours after the procedure.

  2. Success of reduction following the applied protocols.

    The success of the reduction procedure, whether further reduction attempts were necessary, and findings from post-reduction control X-rays (radial height, radial tilt, and volar tilt) will be noted and evaluated by orthopedic physicians.

    Time frame: An x-ray will be taken before the reduction process, i.e. at 10 minutes. An x-ray will be taken at 1 hour after the reduction process.

  3. Evaluation of the need for additional rescue treatments during the procedure.

    If NRS is above 5, as first-line rescue analgesia, tramadol 50 or 100 mg IV diluted in 100 mL normal saline will be administered over 15 minutes. If pain persists above NRS 5, second-line treatment with 50 mcg fentanyl diluted in 100 mL normal saline will be administered over 15 minutes.

    Time frame: Rescue analgesia will be administered if NRS is above 5 fifteen minutes after the protocols are applied.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient and practitioner satisfaction with the reduction procedure.

    Patient and reduction practitioner satisfaction will be recorded using a 5-point Likert scale (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: very good).

    Time frame: The satisfaction survey for both the patient and the reduction practitioner will be conducted 30 minutes after the reduction procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
    Ankara, Yenimahalle 38000, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fauteux-Lamarre E, Burstein B, Cheng A, Bretholz A. Reduced Length of Stay and Adverse Events Using Bier Block for Forearm Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):58-62. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000963. PubMed 27918376 ↗
  • Tekin E, Aydin ME, Turgut MC, Karagoz S, Ates I, Ahiskalioglu EO. Can ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block be an alternative option for forearm reduction in the emergency department? A prospective randomized study. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;8(4):307-313. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.136. Epub 2021 Dec 31. PubMed 35000358 ↗
  • Kukreja P, Kofskey AM, Ransom E, McKenzie C, Feinstein J, Hudson J, Kalagara H. Comparison of Supraclavicular Regional Nerve Block Versus Infraclavicular Regional Nerve Block in Distal Radial Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Retrospective Case Series. Cureus. 2022 Apr 12;14(4):e24079. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24079. eCollection 2022 Apr. PubMed 35573547 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Apr 24, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06588907
Lead sponsor
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Responsible party
Emine Sarcan (Doctor, Ankara Etlik City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2024
Completion
Dec 15, 2024
Last update
Dec 27, 2024

Study contacts

Ahmet Burak Erdem
study director · Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion