ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06585358DoseTBUpdated Nov 21, 2025

DoseTB-individualised Dosing by Model-informed Precision Dosing for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

An observational study in Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Recruiting at 2 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate whether model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), as a clinical support for early individualised dosing in addition to the national TB care program, can optimise the drug exposure of TB drugs during TB treatment.

Main research questions:

In adult patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis, can current dose recommendations and information received from MIPD help clinicians in a timely manner to optimise the drug exposure of TB drugs in the early treatment phase, i.e., the time from PK sampling to dose adjustment (keep or adjust dose)?

Specific aims

I. To perform a process evaluation of early MIPD for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol during active TB treatment.

II. To study the target attainment of first-line TB drugs with MIPD.

III. To evaluate model precision of predicted versus detected drug concentrations.

Drug concentrations will be measured in study participants during TB treatment, and drug exposure and the optimal dose will be predicted by MIPD using pharmacokinetic population models.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Individualised treatment for tuberculosis (TB) to improve treatment outcome has still some substantial obstacles to pass before becoming a reality in clinical practice. Previous studies, including studies from the study research group, have shown that lower than recommended drug concentrations of TB drugs are common, and affect treatment outcome. Despite this, lower than recommended doses are often prescribed by clinicians. Adequate drug doses should be ensured as early as possible in the intensive phase when the bacterial load is high. Simple therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) at the time of steady state of TB drugs are used in many clinical settings today, but time to dose adjustments to avoid suboptimal drug levels is typically several weeks. However, pharmacokinetic models are in place to guide individualised drug dosing by Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) already from the first days of treatment. MIPD, in combination with currently recommended dose recommendations, can be used to derive the most efficacious and safe dose for a patient. A similar approach has been implemented for dosing of vancomycin in children but has not been used in a clinical setting in the field of TB. This study will evaluate the logistics and dose regimens when clinicians are given the current dose recommendations of the first-line drugs rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide, as well as the results of the MIPD, for patients with active pulmonary TB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Keywords

  • model-informed precision dosing
  • individualised dosing
03

In context

Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

319 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 300 across 83 observational studies indexed under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary.

Browse Tuberculosis, Pulmonary studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The inclusion of study participants will be done prospectively at two hospitals included in the study sites (Karolinska University Hospital and Region Östergötland). Only patients with pulmonary TB will be included as the MIPD models have been developed using data sets of pulmonary TB and not for extrapulmonary TB.

Participants who are unable to give an informed consent (e.g. persons with severe dementia) will not be included.

The investigators will include at least 30 participants. Blood samples for drug concentration analysis will be performed 2+4 hours postdose at 2 -3 occasions during the study period and measure by a validated HPLC method at Clinical Pharmacology Laboratories in the regions.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult persons ≥18 years with confirmed pulmonary TB (established through Mtb cultures or PCR for Mtb by clinical routine)
  2. Ongoing or planned treatment of TB that includes rifampin
  3. Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. TB treatment with rifampin for longer than 8 weeks prior to inclusion
  2. TB treatment with intravenous rifampin (including patients treated at an intensive care unit (ICU) or patients with cerebral TB)
  3. TDM of rifampin has already been performed (\>24 h before inclusion) by clinical routine
  4. Study participants with extrapulmonary TB without pulmonary TB.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pulmonary tuberculosis

    Other: MIPD

Interventions

  • OtherMIPD

    This is a non-inverventional study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of predicted dose

    Proportion of participants with predicted doses of rifampicin, isoniazid and/or pyrazinamide within 5 days from sampling (%)

    Time frame: Within the first 5 days from sampling

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion reaching predicted drug exposure

    For participants with dose-predicted treatment, proportion who will reach the target levels for rifampicin, isoniazid and/or pyrazinamide after MIPD

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one month

  2. Model precision

    Precision of the model comparing predicted drug levels to the detected drug levels (%)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one month

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdulla A, Edwina EE, Flint RB, Allegaert K, Wildschut ED, Koch BCP, de Hoog M. Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Antibiotics in Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review. Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 23;9:624639. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.624639. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33708753 ↗
  • Azuma J, Ohno M, Kubota R, Yokota S, Nagai T, Tsuyuguchi K, Okuda Y, Takashima T, Kamimura S, Fujio Y, Kawase I; Pharmacogenetics-based tuberculosis therapy research group. NAT2 genotype guided regimen reduces isoniazid-induced liver injury and early treatment failure in the 6-month four-drug standard treatment of tuberculosis: a randomized controlled trial for pharmacogenetics-based therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 May;69(5):1091-101. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1429-9. Epub 2012 Nov 14. PubMed 23150149 ↗
  • Pasipanodya JG, McIlleron H, Burger A, Wash PA, Smith P, Gumbo T. Serum drug concentrations predictive of pulmonary tuberculosis outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2013 Nov 1;208(9):1464-73. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit352. Epub 2013 Jul 29. PubMed 23901086 ↗
  • Niward K, Davies Forsman L, Bruchfeld J, Chryssanthou E, Carlstrom O, Alomari T, Carlsson B, Pohanka A, Mansjo M, Jonsson Nordvall M, Johansson AG, Eliasson E, Werngren J, Paues J, Simonsson USH, Schon T. Distribution of plasma concentrations of first-line anti-TB drugs and individual MICs: a prospective cohort study in a low endemic setting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2838-2845. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky268. PubMed 30124844 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 23 months after the start.

Of 44 observational studies under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 13, 2024
First posted
Sep 5, 2024
StartActual
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Nov 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06585358
Collaborators
Karolinska University Hospital, Region Östergötland
Responsible party
Lina Davies Forsman (Principal Investigator, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Lina Davies Forsman, MD, PhD, Associate Professor
Contact
lina.davies.forsman@ki.se
08-12370000
Katarina Niward, MD, PhD
Contact
katarina.niward@liu.se
+46 10 103 00 00
Lina Davies Forsman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion