ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06584045Updated Apr 8, 2025

Efficacy and Safety of Calculus Bovis Sativus (CBS) for Adult Encephalitis (CBSinEncephalitis)

An interventional study of Calculus bovis sativus (CBS) in Encephalitis, Encephalitis, Viral and Autoimmune Encephalitis Caused by N-Methyl D-Aspartate Receptor Antibody, sponsored by Tongji Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by Tongji Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Based on the records of traditional Chinese medicine, CBS has the functions of purifying the heart, eliminating phlegm, stimulating bile secretion, and soothing the nerves. It has the ability to alleviate fever, coma, delirium, epilepsy, convulsions in youngsters, dental caries, throat swelling, mouth ulcers, carbuncle, and furuncle.

Encephalitis is a neurological condition characterized by widespread or multiple inflammation of brain tissue. The causes of encephalitis are many and can stem from infectious organisms or be induced by autoimmune reactions, the latter being referred to as autoimmune encephalitis (AE). The yearly occurrence rate of encephalitis is 12.6 per 100,000 individuals. Among these cases, approximately 40-50% are caused by infectious factors, whereas 20-30% are attributed to autoimmune encephalitis (AE). The development of viral encephalitis involves the direct invasion of brain tissue by the virus and the immune response of the body to viral antigens. The virus multiplies extensively, leading to the degeneration of neurons, necrosis, the proliferation of glial cells, and the infiltration of inflammatory cells. These severe tissue reactions can result in the formation of demyelinating lesions and damage to blood vessels and the areas surrounding them. Additionally, vascular lesions affect the circulation in the brain and worsen the damage to brain tissue. The development of AE involves several factors, including molecular mimicry, the activation of latent antigen epitopes, the spread of antigen epitopes, and the disruption of the innate immune system caused by persistent pathogen infection.

The mechanisms that are clearer can be summarized as follows: (1) Decrease in the number of receptors on the surface due to cross-linking and internalization: Anti-NMDAR antibodies have the ability to attach to NMDAR on the postsynaptic membrane, resulting in a reduction of NMDAR surface density through cross-linking and internalization. This reduction leads to a decrease in NMDAR-mediated current, which in turn causes learning and memory defects. (2) Protein-protein interaction disruption: Anti-LGI1 antibodies can disrupt the binding between LGI1 and ADAM23 on the presynaptic membrane and ADAM22 on the postsynaptic membrane. This disruption leads to a decrease in the density of anti-α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR).

According to the aforementioned background processes, along with the most recent research, there was a decrease in the abundance of gut flora in patients with AE. Transplanting the fecal bacteria of individuals with anti-NMDAR encephalitis into mice's intestines resulted in cognitive impairment in the animals. This indicates that the brain-gut axis may have a significant role in the development of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. From a clinical perspective, patients consume CBS orally in order to achieve its therapeutic benefits. The primary constituents, bilirubin and bile acid, have been documented to possess regulatory effects on the gut microbiota. Thus, we hypothesize that CBS is probable to have neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory impacts on the brain through alterations in the intestinal microbiota and regulation of the brain-gut connection. CBS is expected to decrease the occurrence of symptomatic seizures and enhance the patient's level of consciousness and cognitive abilities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Encephalitis
  • Encephalitis, Viral
  • Autoimmune Encephalitis Caused by N-Methyl D-Aspartate Receptor Antibody
  • Autoimmune Encephalitis
03

In context

Encephalitis

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Encephalitis; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 55 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Encephalitis.

Browse Encephalitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tongji Hospital is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must meet the following eligibility criteria at screening to participate in this study.

1.1 Inclusion criteria for subjects with encephalitis (hereinafter referred to as AE) of all subtypes 1.1.1 Subjects are able to understand the purpose and risks of the study, provide , and authorize the use of confidential health information in accordance with national and local privacy regulations.

1.1.2. Tumors or can be reasonably excluded before the baseline visit (randomization), and screening guidelines for thymoma, teratoma, and malignant tumors should be followed.

1.1.3. Both men and women are welcome, and the age at the time of providing informed consent is 18-80 years old (inclusive).

1.1.4. Meet the diagnosis of AE (according to the Chinese Autoimmune Encephalitis Diagnosis and Treatment Expert Consensus 2022 Edition): A. Clinical manifestations: acute or subacute onset (\<3 months), with one or more of the following neurological and psychiatric symptoms or clinical syndromes.

  • a. Limbic system symptoms: recent memory loss, epileptic seizures, mental and behavioral abnormalities, one or more of the three symptoms.
  • b. Encephalitis syndrome: clinical manifestations of diffuse or multifocal brain damage.
  • c. Clinical manifestations of involvement of the basal ganglia and/or diencephalon/hypothalamus.
  • d. Mental disorder, and the psychiatric specialist believes that it does not meet the non-organic disease.

B. Auxiliary examination: one or more of the following auxiliary examination findings, or combined with related tumors.

  • a. Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid: cerebrospinal fluid leukocytosis (>5×106/L), or cerebrospinal fluid cytology shows lymphocytic inflammation, or specific oligoclonal bands are positive.
  • b. Neuroimaging or electrophysiological abnormalities: MRI limbic system T2 or FLAIR abnormal signals, unilateral or bilateral, or other areas of T2 or FLAIR abnormal signals (excluding nonspecific white matter changes and stroke); or PET imaging limbic system hypermetabolism changes, or multiple cortical and/or basal ganglia hypermetabolism. Figure 1 shows the typical neuroimaging manifestations of AE patients. Abnormal electroencephalogram, manifested as focal epilepsy or epileptiform discharge (located in the temporal lobe or outside the temporal lobe), or diffuse or multifocal slow wave rhythm. In adult patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, abnormal delta brush waves (extreme delta brush) often correspond to prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis.
  • c. Specific types of tumors associated with AE, such as limbic encephalitis combined with small cell lung cancer, anti-NMDAR encephalitis combined with ovarian teratoma.

C. Confirmatory experiments: positive anti-neuronal antibodies. Including NMDA-R, LGI-1, CASPR2, IgLON5, GABAA/BR, GlyR, AMPAR and axonal protein-3α and intracellular substance antibodies anti-Hu, anti-Ma2, anti-CRMP5, anti-Yo, anti-double carrier protein, anti-GAD, etc.

D. Reasonably exclude other causes (refer to the differential diagnosis section of the consensus).

Diagnostic criteria: including possible AEs and confirmed AEs:

  1. Possible AEs: meet the three diagnostic criteria of A, B and D.
  2. Confirmed AEs: meet the four diagnostic criteria of A, B, C and D. 1.1.5. AE symptoms occurred ≤9 months before randomization 1.1.6. Subjects meet new AEs

    • New onset: defined as subjects with NMDA-R or LGI-1 AEs and meeting the following criteria:
    • The mRS score measured at baseline is stable (at least 24 hours) and is ≥2 points.
    • Received the first acute treatment within 6 weeks before randomization (baseline visit).

    1.1.7. All females of and all males must use during the study and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. In addition, subjects should not donate sperm or eggs during the study and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.

    1.1.8. Stable neurological examination within 30 days before baseline (Visit 1).

    1.2 Additional inclusion criteria for the NMDA-R AE cohort

    In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1.1, only subjects who met all of the following criteria were eligible for inclusion in the NMDA-R AE cohort:

    • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent
    • Informed consent, as appropriate based on patient age, specific site, and national criteria
    • Suspected or definite NMDAR AE diagnosis as follows:

    1.2.1. Suspected NMDAR encephalitis was diagnosed when all three of the following criteria were met: 1.2.1.1 Rapid onset (less than 3 months) of at least four of the following six cardinal symptoms:

    • Abnormal (psychiatric) behavior or cognitive dysfunction
    • Speech dysfunction (rushing speech, hypospeech, mutism)
    • Seizures
    • Ataxia, dyskinesia, or rigid/abnormal posture
    • Decreased level of consciousness
    • Autonomic dysfunction or central hypoventilation 1.2.1.2. At least one of the following laboratory results:
    • Abnormal EEG (focal or diffuse slow or disorganized activity, epileptic activity, or extreme delta brushes)
    • CSF with pleocytosis or oligoclonal bands 1.2.1.3. Reasonable exclusion of other etiologies and other clear encephalitis syndromes: for example, Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Hashimoto encephalopathy, primary angiitis of the central nervous system (CNS), Rasmussen encephalitis.

    Note: If the above three groups of symptoms in criterion 1.2.1.1 are present and accompanied by systemic teratoma, suspected NMDAR encephalitis can also be diagnosed.

    1.2.2 Definite NMDAR encephalitis can be diagnosed when the following three criteria are met at the same time: 1.2.2.1. The presence of one or more of the six main symptoms described in criterion 1.2.1.1 for suspected NMDAR encephalitis.

    1.2.2.2. History of anti-NMDAR (GluN1) IgG antibodies detected in CSF using a cell-based assay.

    1.2.3. Reasonable exclusion of other etiologies and other well-defined encephalitis syndromes: e.g., Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Hashimoto encephalopathy, primary angiitis of the central nervous system (CNS), Rasmussen encephalitis.

    1.3 Other inclusion criteria for the LGI-1 AE cohort

    In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1.1, only subjects who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for inclusion in the LGI1 AE cohort:

    1.3.1 Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent For subjects who are unable to provide informed consent due to the severity of their illness, the informed consent may be signed by their legally authorized representative at the time of obtaining the subject's consent, according to local requirements.

    1.3.2 Diagnosis of LGI-1 AE

    The diagnosis of LGI-1 encephalitis can be made when both of the following criteria are met:

    1.3.2.1 Documented history of anti-LGI-1 IgG antibodies (in serum or CSF) using a cell-based assay.

    1.3.2.2 Subacute onset (less than 4 months of development) of working memory deficits, seizures (including faciobrachial dystonic seizures), or psychiatric symptoms suggestive of limbic system involvement.

    1.3.2.3 Diagnosis of LGI1 AE is reasonable when other etiologies and other well-defined encephalitis syndromes are excluded: e.g., Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Hashimoto encephalopathy, primary CNS vasculitis, Rasmussen encephalitis.

    1.4 Other inclusion criteria for the AA AE cohort

    In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1.1, only subjects who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for inclusion in the AA AE cohort:

    • Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form For subjects who are unable to provide informed consent due to the severity of their illness, the informed consent form may be signed by their legally authorized representative when the subject agrees, according to local requirements.
    • Diagnosis of AA AE Meet the diagnosis of AE in 1.1, negative for anti-NMDA antibodies and anti-LGI-1 antibodies, and positive for at least one of the other anti-neuronal antibodies.

    1.5 Inclusion criteria for viral encephalitis (hereinafter referred to as VE) cohort

    The following four conditions must be met simultaneously for diagnosis of VE:

    • Primary condition: altered mental status, including decreased level of consciousness, drowsiness, or abnormal mental behavior lasting ≥24 h; or new onset of epileptic seizure
    • Secondary condition: fever ≥38 °C (before or within 72 h after onset), or new focal manifestations of the nervous system, or cerebrospinal fluid leukocytes ≥5×10\^6/L, or cerebrospinal fluid cytology showing lymphocytic inflammation, or imaging showing brain parenchymal lesions consistent with encephalitis, or abnormal electroencephalogram consistent with encephalitis
    • Confirmatory laboratory test: positive cerebrospinal fluid viral nucleic acid (polymerase chain reaction or metagenomic next-generation sequencing), or positive cerebrospinal fluid and/or serum antiviral antibody IgM
    • Reasonable exclusion of other causes

    1.6 Healthy cohort:

    • Age ≥ 18 years old when signing the informed consent form
    • Healthy adult subjects without underlying diseases

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Any cardiac, endocrine, hematologic, hepatic, immune, infectious, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, neurological, dermatologic, psychiatric, and renal disease or other major medical history that the investigator determines would preclude participation in the clinical trial.
    • Any untreated teratoma or thymoma at the baseline visit (randomization)
    • Other causes of symptoms, including central nervous system infection, septic encephalopathy, metabolic encephalopathy, epileptic disorders, mitochondrial disease, Klein-Levin syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, rheumatic disease, Reyes syndrome, or inborn errors of metabolism.
    • History of herpes simplex encephalitis within the previous 24 weeks. 1.5. Any surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to baseline, except laparoscopic surgery or minor surgery (defined as surgery requiring only local anesthesia or conscious sedation, i.e., surgery that does not require general, neuraxial, or regional anesthesia and can be performed on an outpatient basis; e.g., toenail surgery, mole surgery, wisdom tooth extraction), excluding thymoma or teratoma removal.
    • Planned surgery during the study (except minor surgery).
    • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions, or any allergic reaction that the investigator believes may be exacerbated by any component of study treatment.
    • Current or history of malignant disease, including solid tumors and hematologic (except for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma that have been completely resected and considered cured for at least 12 months prior to Day -1). Subjects with cancer remission for more than 5 years prior to baseline (Visit 1) may be included after discussion with the sponsor/sponsor approval.
    • A history of gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy or cholecystectomy performed more than 6 months before screening), irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), or other clinically significant active gastrointestinal diseases in the opinion of the investigator.
    • A history of clinically significant recurrent or active gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, dyspepsia, constipation) within 90 days before screening, including the need to start symptomatic treatment (e.g., start medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease) or a change in symptomatic treatment within 90 days before screening (e.g., dose increase).
    • A history of diverticulitis or concurrent severe gastrointestinal (GI) abnormalities (e.g., symptomatic diverticular disease) because the investigator believes that this may lead to an increased risk of complications such as GI perforation.
    • A history of blood donation (1 unit or more), plasma donation, or donation within 90 days before screening.
    • Active suicidal ideation within 6 months before screening, or a history of suicide attempt within 3 years before screening.
    • Based on the investigator's judgment, there are serious diseases or abnormalities in the clinical laboratory test results that prevent the patient from completing the study or participating in the study safely.
    • Pregnant or lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study or within 3 months after the last dose of the study drug; women of must have a negative serum pregnancy test result at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test result before the start of the study.
    • The subject's mental or physical condition will hinder the evaluation of efficacy and safety.
    • Systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg or \<90 mmHg after sitting still for 5 minutes or before dosing at screening. If out of range, it can be measured again at screening and before dosing. If the repeated measurement value is still out of range, the subject shall not receive the drug.
    • Subjects with second or third degree atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, poorly controlled atrial fibrillation, severe or unstable angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or significant abnormalities, including interval >450 msec (male) or 470 msec (female), where corrected QT interval is determined based on the Fridericia correction method, within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
    • Planned elective procedures or surgeries at any time after signing the Form by follow-up visit.
    • Any condition that affects the absorption of study treatment (e.g., gastrectomy).
    • History of to heparin or history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
    • Subjects with abnormalities in medical history, physical examination, ECG, or diagnostic laboratory tests that the investigator considers to be clinically relevant.
    • History of (HIV) or positive test results at screening.
    • Current infection with (defined as positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies and detectable HCV RNA). Subjects with positive HCV antibodies and HCV RNA below the limit of detection are eligible to participate in the study.
    • Current infection with (defined as positive HBsAg and/or positive total anti-HBc).
    • Chronic, recurrent, or severe infection (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) within 90 days prior to baseline (visit 1).
    • History of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis or positive latent TB test result.
    • Symptoms of bacterial, fungal, or viral infection (including upper respiratory tract infection) within 28 days prior to baseline (visit 1). Subjects with localized fungal infection (e.g., candidiasis, tinea) are eligible for rescreening after successful treatment of the infection.
    • Infection requiring hospitalization or IV anti-infective medication within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit.
    • Any live or within 28 days prior to baseline (visit 1) or planned during the study.
    • to all of the following salvage therapies: rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, high-dose , or IV cyclophosphamide.
    • History of or receipt of the following treatments: Total lymphoid irradiation, cladribine, T-cell or T Cell recipient vaccination, total body irradiation, or total lymphoid irradiation at any time. Stem cell transplantation at any time.
    • Abnormal laboratory values determined by the investigator to be clinically significant at Screening or Baseline (Visit 1).
    • Any of the following blood test abnormalities at Screening: a. White blood cell count \< 3.0 × 10\^3/µL. b. \< 2.0 × 10\^3/µL. c. Absolute lymphocyte count \< 0.5 × 10\^3/µL. d. Platelet count \< × 10 × 10\^4/µL. e. glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, or γ-glutamyl transpeptidase ≥ 3 x (ULN) or > 2 x ULN. f. ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. g. Lymphocyte count \< lower limit of normal
    • Any of the following urine test abnormalities at Screening: a. β-2-microglobulin>0.3 μg/mL. b. Albumin/creatinine ratio>22.6 mg/mmol.
    • Previous participation in this study.
    • Blood donation (1 unit or more) within 90 days before screening, plasma donation within 1 week before screening, and platelet donation within 6 weeks before screening.
    • History of alcohol or drug abuse in the past year (determined by the investigator).
    • Pregnant or lactating subjects, as well as subjects planning to become pregnant or start breastfeeding at any time during the study and within 30 days after completion of study treatment.
    • Participating in a clinical trial or having participated in a clinical trial within 90 days before screening.
    • History of clinically significant suicidal thoughts or behaviors in the past 12 months as assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale at screening.
    • Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol requirements.
    • The patient has obvious hearing or vision impairment, language barriers, claustrophobia, etc., which makes the patient unable to cooperate with the neuropsychological scale assessment and MRI examination.
    • The researcher or sponsor believes that there are other unknown reasons that make the subject unsuitable for inclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(21)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CBS therapy, CBS dosage: 100mg per day from day 1 to day 84, in encephalitis cohort

    Subjects in encephalitis cohort of this arm will receive general therapy plus CBS.

    Drug: Calculus bovis sativus (CBS)

  • No intervention
    Control therapy: no intervention, in encephalitis cohort

    Subjects in encephalitis cohort of this arm will only receive general therapy.

  • Experimental
    CBS therapy, CBS dosage: 100mg per day from day 1 to day 84, in healthy cohort

    Subjects in healthy cohort of this arm will only receive CBS.

    Drug: Calculus bovis sativus (CBS)

Interventions

  • DrugCalculus bovis sativus (CBS)

    Subjects will orally receive 100mg CBS per day from day 1 to day 84.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    To assess mRS of subjects within 12 weeks after treatment initiation. The score ranges from 0 to 5. 5 represents the worst.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  2. Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE)

    To assess CASE of subjects within 12 weeks after treatment initiation. The score ranges from 0 to 27. 27 represents the worst.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  3. Incidence and Severity of Adverse Effects (AEs) and Severe Adverse Effects (SAEs)

    To evaluate the AEs and SAEs occurred within 14 weeks after treatment initiation

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks after treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of newly increased inflammatory lesions on T2 flair weighted imaging at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  2. The number of newly increased inflammatory lesions on gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted imaging at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  3. The quantity of epileptiform abnormalities on electroencephalograph at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  4. The quantity of background deterioration on electroencephalograph at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  5. The score of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    The score of MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and 30 represents the best.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  6. Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    The score of MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and 30 represents the best.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  7. The score of Hamilton Anxiety Scale at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    The score of Hamilton Anxiety Scale ranges from 0 to 56, and 56 represents the worst.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  8. The score of Hamilton Depression Scale at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    The score of Hamilton Depression Scale ranges from 0 to 81, and 81 represents the worst.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  9. The score of 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    The score of SF-36 ranges from 0 to 100, and 100 represents the best.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  10. The incidence of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) events at week 14 compared with baseline (visit 1) and control group.

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks after treatment initiation

Other outcomes

  1. The abundance of fecal flora at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1).

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  2. Quantitative and qualitative changes in fecal metabolomics analysis at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1).

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  3. Profiling of lymphocytes subtypes in serum, including absolute counting and ratio of each type of lymphocyte, at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1).

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  4. The value of SUVmax and ratio of T/B of inflammatory lesion in 18F-DPA-714 PET/MR imaging examinations at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1).

    To evaluate the degree of inflammation related to microglia in brain through 18F-DPA-714 PET/MR.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

  5. Concentration of inflammatory factors (IL-1β/IL-2R/IL-6/IL-8/IL-10/TNF-α) in cerebrospinal fluid at week 12 compared with baseline (visit 1).

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after treatment initiation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China
    Recruiting
    • Ke Shang, MD · Contactkay_sang@qq.com · 86-27-83663337
    • Ke Shang, MD · Contactkay_sang@hust.edu.cn · 86-27-83663333
    • Wei Wang, MD · Principal investigator
    • Ke Fang, MD · Sub investigator
    • Daishi Tian, MD · Sub investigator
    • Chuan Qin, MD · Sub investigator
    • Luo-qi Zhou, MD · Sub investigator
    • Ke Shang, MD · Sub investigator
    • Jun Xiao, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen H, Chen Z, Shen L, Wu X, Ma X, Lin D, Zhang M, Ma X, Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Kuang Z, Lu Z, Li X, Ma L, Lin X, Si L, Chen X. Fecal microbiota transplantation from patients with autoimmune encephalitis modulates Th17 response and relevant behaviors in mice. Cell Death Discov. 2020 Aug 11;6:75. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-00309-8. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32821439 ↗
  • Fu WJ, Lei T, Yin Z, Pan JH, Chai YS, Xu XY, Yan YX, Wang ZH, Ke J, Wu G, Xu RH, Paranjpe M, Qu L, Nie H. Anti-atherosclerosis and cardio-protective effects of the Angong Niuhuang Pill on a high fat and vitamin D3 induced rodent model of atherosclerosis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Jan 4;195:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 20. PubMed 27880884 ↗
  • Zhou J, Jiang T, Wang J, Wu W, Duan X, Jiang H, Jiao Z, Wang X. Multimodal investigation reveals the neuroprotective mechanism of Angong Niuhuang pill for intracerebral hemorrhage: Converging bioinformatics, network pharmacology, and experimental validation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024 Jan 30;319(Pt 1):117045. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117045. Epub 2023 Aug 24. PubMed 37633621 ↗
  • Yu ZJ, Xu Y, Peng W, Liu YJ, Zhang JM, Li JS, Sun T, Wang P. Calculus bovis: A review of the traditional usages, origin, chemistry, pharmacological activities and toxicology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 May 23;254:112649. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112649. Epub 2020 Feb 14. PubMed 32068140 ↗
  • Shi Y, Xiong J, Sun D, Liu W, Wei F, Ma S, Lin R. Simultaneous quantification of the major bile acids in artificial Calculus bovis by high-performance liquid chromatography with precolumn derivatization and its application in quality control. J Sep Sci. 2015 Aug;38(16):2753-62. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201500139. Epub 2015 Jun 30. PubMed 26016891 ↗
  • Shimada K, Azuma Y, Kawase M, Takahashi T, Schaffer SW, Takahashi K. Taurine as a marker for the identification of natural Calculus Bovis and its substitutes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;776:141-9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6093-0_15. PubMed 23392879 ↗
  • Li X, Yao Y, Chen M, Ding H, Liang C, Lv L, Zhao H, Zhou G, Luo Z, Li Y, Zhang H. Comprehensive evaluation integrating omics strategy and machine learning algorithms for consistency of calculus bovis from different sources. Talanta. 2022 Jan 15;237:122873. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122873. Epub 2021 Sep 30. PubMed 34736706 ↗
  • Liu Y, Tan P, Liu S, Shi H, Feng X, Ma Q. A new method for identification of natural, artificial and in vitro cultured Calculus bovis using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacogn Mag. 2015 Apr-Jun;11(42):304-10. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.153083. PubMed 25829769 ↗
  • Tang Y, Han Z, Zhang H, Che L, Liao G, Peng J, Lin Y, Wang Y. Characterization of Calculus bovis by principal component analysis assisted qHNMR profiling to distinguish nefarious frauds. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2023 May 10;228:115320. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115320. Epub 2023 Mar 1. PubMed 36871364 ↗
  • Takahashi K, Azuma Y, Shimada K, Saito T, Kawase M, Schaffer SW. Quality and safety issues related to traditional animal medicine: role of taurine. J Biomed Sci. 2010 Aug 24;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-17-S1-S44. PubMed 20804621 ↗
  • Lu F, Wang L, Chen Y, Zhong X, Huang Z. In vitro cultured calculus bovis attenuates cerebral ischaemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting neuronal apoptosis and protecting mitochondrial function in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Dec 5;263:113168. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113168. Epub 2020 Jul 27. PubMed 32730869 ↗
  • Zhong XM, Ren XC, Lou YL, Chen MJ, Li GZ, Gong XY, Huang Z. Effects of in-vitro cultured calculus bovis on learning and memory impairments of hyperlipemia vascular dementia rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016 Nov 4;192:390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 9. PubMed 27616028 ↗
  • Vitek L, Tiribelli C. Bilirubin: The yellow hormone? J Hepatol. 2021 Dec;75(6):1485-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 18. PubMed 34153399 ↗
  • Thakkar M, Edelenbos J, Dore S. Bilirubin and Ischemic Stroke: Rendering the Current Paradigm to Better Understand the Protective Effects of Bilirubin. Mol Neurobiol. 2019 Aug;56(8):5483-5496. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1440-y. Epub 2019 Jan 5. PubMed 30612336 ↗
  • Vasavda C, Kothari R, Malla AP, Tokhunts R, Lin A, Ji M, Ricco C, Xu R, Saavedra HG, Sbodio JI, Snowman AM, Albacarys L, Hester L, Sedlak TW, Paul BD, Snyder SH. Bilirubin Links Heme Metabolism to Neuroprotection by Scavenging Superoxide. Cell Chem Biol. 2019 Oct 17;26(10):1450-1460.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 25. PubMed 31353321 ↗
  • Liu HW, Gong LN, Lai K, Yu XF, Liu ZQ, Li MX, Yin XL, Liang M, Shi HS, Jiang LH, Yang W, Shi HB, Wang LY, Yin SK. Bilirubin gates the TRPM2 channel as a direct agonist to exacerbate ischemic brain damage. Neuron. 2023 May 17;111(10):1609-1625.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Mar 14. PubMed 36921602 ↗
  • Bhargava P, Smith MD, Mische L, Harrington E, Fitzgerald KC, Martin K, Kim S, Reyes AA, Gonzalez-Cardona J, Volsko C, Tripathi A, Singh S, Varanasi K, Lord HN, Meyers K, Taylor M, Gharagozloo M, Sotirchos ES, Nourbakhsh B, Dutta R, Mowry EM, Waubant E, Calabresi PA. Bile acid metabolism is altered in multiple sclerosis and supplementation ameliorates neuroinflammation. J Clin Invest. 2020 Jul 1;130(7):3467-3482. doi: 10.1172/JCI129401. PubMed 32182223 ↗
  • Li CX, Wang XQ, Cheng FF, Yan X, Luo J, Wang QG. Hyodeoxycholic acid protects the neurovascular unit against oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation-induced injury in vitro. Neural Regen Res. 2019 Nov;14(11):1941-1949. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.259617. PubMed 31290452 ↗
  • Khalaf K, Tornese P, Cocco A, Albanese A. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid: a potential therapeutic tool in neurodegenerative diseases. Transl Neurodegener. 2022 Jun 4;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40035-022-00307-z. PubMed 35659112 ↗
  • Hurley MJ, Bates R, Macnaughtan J, Schapira AHV. Bile acids and neurological disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Dec;240:108311. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108311. Epub 2022 Nov 16. PubMed 36400238 ↗
  • Jangra A, Gola P, Singh J, Gond P, Ghosh S, Rachamalla M, Dey A, Iqbal D, Kamal M, Sachdeva P, Jha SK, Ojha S, Kumar D, Jha NK, Chopra H, Tan SC. Emergence of taurine as a therapeutic agent for neurological disorders. Neural Regen Res. 2024 Jan;19(1):62-68. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.374139. PubMed 37488845 ↗
  • Liu K, Zhu R, Jiang H, Li B, Geng Q, Li Y, Qi J. Taurine inhibits KDM3a production and microglia activation in lipopolysaccharide-treated mice and BV-2 cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2022 Sep;122:103759. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2022.103759. Epub 2022 Jul 25. PubMed 35901929 ↗
  • Ohsawa Y, Hagiwara H, Nishimatsu SI, Hirakawa A, Kamimura N, Ohtsubo H, Fukai Y, Murakami T, Koga Y, Goto YI, Ohta S, Sunada Y; KN01 Study Group. Taurine supplementation for prevention of stroke-like episodes in MELAS: a multicentre, open-label, 52-week phase III trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 May;90(5):529-536. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-317964. Epub 2018 Apr 17. PubMed 29666206 ↗
  • Martinez-Vacas A, Di Pierdomenico J, Gallego-Ortega A, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Vidal-Sanz M, Picaud S, Villegas-Perez MP, Garcia-Ayuso D. Systemic taurine treatment affords functional and morphological neuroprotection of photoreceptors and restores retinal pigment epithelium function in RCS rats. Redox Biol. 2022 Nov;57:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102506. Epub 2022 Oct 14. PubMed 36270186 ↗
  • Zhang F, Deng Y, Wang H, Fu J, Wu G, Duan Z, Zhang X, Cai Y, Zhou H, Yin J, He Y. Gut microbiota-mediated ursodeoxycholic acids regulate the inflammation of microglia through TGR5 signaling after MCAO. Brain Behav Immun. 2024 Jan;115:667-679. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Nov 19. PubMed 37989444 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2029, 58 months after the start.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Encephalitis, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 58 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2024
First posted
Sep 4, 2024
StartActual
Sep 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Apr 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06584045
Lead sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Collaborators
Jianmin Pharmaceutical Group Co., LTD.
Responsible party
Wei Wang (Professor of Neurology, Tongji Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 4, 2024
Start date
Sep 30, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Study contacts

Ke Shang, MD
Contact
kay_sang@qq.com
86-27-83663337
Ke Shang, MD
Contact
kay_sang@hust.edu.cn
86-27-83663477

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion