CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06582316DiSaBUpdated May 22, 2025

Digital Solution for Salutogenic Brain Health (DiSaB): A Pilot Protocol for Clinical Implementation

An interventional study of Brain Health Training Programme in Chronic Condition, sponsored by National University of Singapore. Recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-22.

Sponsored by National University of Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop and learn if a digitally delivered brain health intervention (DiSaB) can help improve cognitive, physical and psychosocial health in middle-aged adults with chronic conditions at-risk for cognitive decline. The clinical trial also aims to find out the push and pull factors of implementing the intervention in primary care settings. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the DiSaB intervention improve participants' cognitive functions, health measures, and psychosocial health?
  2. Is an individualised or group-based health education session better at improving cognitive, physical and psychosocial health in participants who did not respond to the DiSaB intervention?
  3. How useful and practical is the DiSaB intervention, according to

    1. participants and
    2. nurses carrying out the intervention?

The investigators will compare a DiSaB intervention to a control condition (where participants do not undergo any intervention) to see if the DiSaB intervention works in improving participants' health.

The investigators will also compare individualised versus group health education sessions to see which session is better at improving the health of participants who did not respond to the DiSaB intervention.

Participants will

  1. Complete cognitive assessments, questionnaires, and health tests before intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention
  2. Either undergo no intervention, or undergo the DiSaB intervention over 2 months
  3. Be randomly selected to attend focus group interviews

Local champions will complete questionnaires and attend focus group interviews after administering and/or co-facilitating the intervention.

Read the detailed description

The effectiveness of the DiSaB intervention implementation at primary care setting amongst participants with long term conditions will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) model.

Secondly, the barriers and facilitators to DiSaB implementation amongst local champions [e.g., advanced practice nurses (APNs)] will be determined. Specifically, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model, the investigators will evaluate the barriers and facilitators towards DiSaB intervention implementation among healthcare professionals.

Third, sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART) study design will also be employed in this study for the development of dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) tailored for individual needs. The investigators first aim to evaluate the feasibility and compare the efficacy of additional individual intervention (i.e. a health education individual feedback session within 1 - 2 months) vs a smaller group intervention (i.e. health education group sessions over 3 months, once per month) post-standard TYB intervention amongst non-responders, in improving cognitive functions and management of their long-term conditions. Finally, the investigators will compare two embedded DTRs in the SMART, namely, (1) standard TYB followed by individualised health education session for non-responders and usual care for responders, and (2) standard TYB followed by group health education session for non-responders and usual care for responders.

Lastly, an economic evaluation will be carried out to evaluate cost-effectiveness and further impacts of the DiSaB implementation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Condition

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Implementation Science
  • Digital Intervention
  • Hypertension
  • Hyperlipidaemia
  • Type-2 Diabetes
03

In context

Chronic Disease

990 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Disease; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 120 across 722 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Disease.

Browse Chronic Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

National University of Singapore is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 40 - 55 years old
  • Have hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and/or type-2 diabetes
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Posses sufficient English language skills in reading, writing and speaking
  • Multimorbidity conditions are also acceptable with the exception of life-threatening co-morbidities with life expectancy of less than one year
  • Total Risk Score (TRS) for cognitive impairment of at least 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical, visual and/or hearing impairment
  • Language impairment (i.e. severe dysarthria or aphasia)
  • Not within age range listed
  • Major or active psychiatric conditions
  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Do not own a mobile device capable of downloading applications (i.e. Zoom), and/or do not have access to internet connection
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    Participants will undergo 8 sessions of digital "Train Your Brain" programme lead by a trained clinical neuropsychologist over 2 months.

    Other: Brain Health Training Programme

  • No intervention
    Control Arm

    Participants will not undergo any sessions of digital "Train Your Brain" programme for 2 months when intervention arm's brain health training programme is ongoing.

Interventions

  • OtherBrain Health Training Programme

    "Train Your Brain (TYB)" - group-based cognitive intervention programme for mild cognitive impairments. This programme equips participants with knowledge on cognition and brain health, provide cognitive coping strategies and boost their confidence and maintain independence in daily activities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in heart rate

    Heart rate will be measured on-site

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; months 9/12)

  2. Change in lipid levels

    Information will be obtained from patients; HealthHub/Health Buddy/OneNUHS or other health apps

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; months 9/12)

  3. Change in HbA1c levels

    Information will be obtained from patients; HealthHub/Health Buddy/OneNUHS or other health apps

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  4. Change in blood pressure

    Blood pressure will be measured on-site

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  5. Change in SDMT scores

    Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT). Total maximum score is 110. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  6. Change in psychosocial health measured by DaSS-21

    Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 item (DASS-21) Physical or online. There are 21 questions that are scored from 0 to 3, and the highest possible score is 63. Higher scores indicate poorer psychological health.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  7. Change in MoCA scores

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Total possible score is 30 (scoring is on the MoCA form itself), and a score of at least 26 indicates normal cognition. Higher scores indicate better cognition.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  8. Change in quality of life measured by EQ-5D-5L

    EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Physical or online. Each question is scored from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating no problems in that dimension and 5 indicating total inability to perform in that dimension.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  9. Change in psychosocial health measured by AD8

    Alzheimer's Disease-8 Component (AD8) Physical or online. There are a total of 8 questions asking about thinking ability, and each answer is coded 1 (yes, change present) or 0 (no change). 0 or 1 indicates normal cognition, and a score of at least 2 suggests that cognition issues might be present.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  10. Change in psychosocial health measured by Self-care of chronic illness inventory

    Physical or online. 29 questions in total, answers are scored from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better self-care. When referencing standard scores, a standard score of 70 is the cut-off point for self-care adequacy.

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; month 9/12)

  11. Patient satisfaction feedback questionnaire (patients)

    Completed online

    Time frame: Weekly (right after each TYB intervention) for 2 months. Also after health education sessions: either once [individual session] OR monthly for 3 months [group session]; during months 4-6) - intervention arm non-responders only

  12. Feedback from patients using focus group interview

    Questions are developed from RE-AIM model. Participants will be randomly chosen (n=30) to take part in the focus group interview.

    Time frame: Final follow up (month 9/12)

  13. Effectiveness of TYB intervention questionnaire (nurses)

    Using RE-AIM model; completed online. Questionnaire will be given at multiple time points throughout the study, as listed below.

    Time frame: Weekly for 2 months (after each TYB intervention - months 1-3 for intervention arm and months 4-6 for control arm), final follow up (month 12)

  14. Effectiveness of DiSaB intervention questionnaire (patients)

    Using RE-AIM model; completed online. Questionnaire is given at multiple points throughout the study, as listed below.

    Time frame: Once at the end of TYB intervention (month 3 for intervention arm, month 6 for control arm), once during final follow-up (month 9/12 for all participants)

  15. Feedback from nurses using focus group interview

    Questions are developed from RE-AIM model

    Time frame: Month 6 (immediately after completion of 2-month-long TYB intervention control arm)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Economic evaluation on the feasibility of DiSaB implementation using cost-effectiveness questionnaire

    For evaluation of economics and further impact

    Time frame: Baseline (all participants; month 0), first follow up (all participants; month 3), second follow up (only for control group; at month 6), and final follow up (all participants; months 9/12)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National University Polyclinics
    Singapore, Singapore
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06582316
Lead sponsor
National University of Singapore
Responsible party
Catherine Yanhong Dong, PhD (Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2024
Start date
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2025

Study contacts

YanHong Dong, PhD
Contact
nurdy@nus.edu.sg
65-65168686

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion