CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06579079Updated Apr 24, 2025

Improving Participation in Universal School Meals (USM)

An interventional study of Implementation Mapping and Waitlist Comparison - Implementation Mapping in Food Deprivation and Obesity, Childhood, sponsored by Temple University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-24.

Sponsored by Temple University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of an implementation strategy on participation in Universal School Meals (USM).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this cluster randomized trial is to test the effectiveness of an implementation strategy on implementation and student health outcomes of universal school meals (USM). This will be completed by developing and tailoring of an implementation strategy and testing its effectiveness though a cluster randomized design. Primary implementation outcomes of this trial are acceptability, cost, feasibility, penetration, and sustainability. Secondary student health outcomes are changes in diet quality (district-wide survey for students), food insecurity (USDA 6-item screener), and weight status. Exploratory descriptive models will be run to assess differences between intervention and control schools. To provide evidence for approaches in adolescents at highest risk for poor dietary intake, food security, and obesity risk, racial and ethnic minority adolescents from the School District of Philadelphia will comprise the majority of the sample. The principal investigator has just completed a year-long needs assessment with 8 schools across the district. We will aim to recruit 4 schools to be randomized to 1 of 2 conditions. Recruitment is underway, final recruitment details will be added once randomization is complete. From these schools, we aim to randomize (2 intervention; 2 waitlist comparison) for the development and tailoring of an implementation strategy. At baseline and throughout the 2-year trial period, we aim to collect interview data and surveys, and analyze data on diet quality, food security, and weight status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Deprivation
  • Obesity, Childhood

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pediatric Obesity

1,117 studies on the registry are indexed under Pediatric Obesity; 189 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 103 across 862 interventional studies indexed under Pediatric Obesity.

Browse Pediatric Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Temple University is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • An elementary/middle or high school within the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) that provides free breakfast and lunch to students
  • School is willing to be randomized to either a treatment or waitlist comparison condition
  • School has a team of teachers, administration, and food service staff who are willing to complete interviews and surveys for data collection
  • School has valid data for student Body Mass Index, meal participation, and food insecurity (parent reported).
  • Students currently enrolled in a SDP elementary/middle/high school
  • Students willing to participate in an interview and complete surveys
  • Students have participated in school meals in the last year.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Charter schools and private schools
  • Students not enrolled in school full time; students under 11 years of age.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Implementation Strategy - Intervention Condition

    Schools in the intervention condition will be assigned to receive coaching and logistical support to develop and tailor an implementation strategy across 1 academic year. This strategy will then be implemented gradually and in the following academic years (2- year pilot).

    Other: Implementation Mapping

  • Active comparator
    Waitlist Control

    Schools in the waitlist control will wait 1 academic year before developing and testing an implementation strategy (1-year pilot)

    Other: Waitlist Comparison - Implementation Mapping

Interventions

  • OtherImplementation Mapping

    Implementation mapping is a stakeholder-driven process whereby researchers and practitioners work together to develop an implementation strategy.

  • OtherWaitlist Comparison - Implementation Mapping

    Implementation mapping is a stakeholder-driven process whereby researchers and practitioners work together to develop an implementation strategy. Participating schools receiving this treatment will wait one year before developing an implementation strategy for testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. School Meal Participation

    Counts to calculate number of students who participate in breakfast and lunch each day will be generated and totaled for each school.

    Time frame: Throughout study completion

  2. Qualitative Interviews

    Focus group interviews with students, parents, teachers, administration, and food service staff.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Implementation Mapping Self-Assessment

    Self-assessment to document fidelity to implementation mapping procedures.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Implementation Cost Measure

    A survey developed through stakeholder interviews to calculate costs of implementation will be completed by schools.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  5. Implementation Outcomes Surveys

    Implementation outcomes of perceived acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of the implementation strategy will be assessed through surveys completed by school stakeholders

    Time frame: 1 Year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Height

    Student height (feet, inches) is collected by school nurses and other professionals in the school district. These data are a secondary outcome to implementation outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

  2. Food Insecurity

    The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 6-item food screening questionnaire is administered to parents across the district. These data are a secondary outcome to implementation outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

  3. Dietary Behaviors

    Students complete a survey each year which records their nutrition behaviors such as fruit and vegetable consumption, sugar-sweetened beverages, and other key behaviors. These data are a secondary outcome to implementation outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

  4. Student Weight

    Student weight (pounds) is collected by school nurses and other professionals in the school district. These data are a secondary outcome to implementation outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Temple University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data elements: 1) Individual linked integrated database containing up to \~1000 records from the School District of Philadelphia from 2024-2027; 2) up to \~100 interview recordings and transcripts conducted with students in middle (6-8) and high (9-12) school grades, teachers, food service staff/personnel, administrators, and other staff; 3) up to \~30-50 survey entries to capture implementation outcomes of acceptability, feasibility, cost, and sustainability. 1) Data are accessible only to the study team through an existing data license agreement between Temple University and the School District of Philadelphia. We do not anticipate the ability to preserve and share these data. 2) Transcripts will be de-identified and any potentially revealing information will be removed prior to sharing. 3) Survey data will be de-identified and any potentially revealing information will be removed prior to sharing.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06579079
Lead sponsor
Temple University
Collaborators
The School District of Philadelphia, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Gabriella McLoughlin (Assistant Professor, Temple University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Start date
Feb 20, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion