ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06576934eTIPSUpdated May 1, 2026

Early TIPS in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Ascites

An interventional study of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in Liver Cirrhosis, Ascites Hepatic and Portal Hypertension, sponsored by University Hospital Freiburg. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital Freiburg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation with standard treatment (diuretic medications, and if necessary, paracenteses) in patients with liver cirrhosis and development of ascites as the first decompensating event.

By creating a shunt between the liver vein and the portal vein, blood is diverted from the portal vein directly into the hepatic vein, which results in a reduction of pressure in the portal vein so that development of ascites is reduced.

Read the detailed description

Complications in patients with liver cirrhosis are mainly due to the development of clinical significant portal hypertension. These complications include development of varices and ascites. Implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has emerged as a safe and effective interventional treatment of portal hypertension. TIPS implantation is recommended for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Further, in patients with acute variceal bleeding, early TIPS implantation within 72 hours after the bleeding episode is associated with a lower re-bleeding rate and also improved survival in high risk patients. In patients with ascites, TIPS implantation is recommend in more advanced stages when conservative treatment has failed to control ascites. Importantly, ascites clearance can be achieved in only 51% in these patients. Recently, it has been shown that patients with a lower paracenteses frequency have a higher chance of ascites control compared to patients with long-term paracenteses. These data suggest that TIPS implantation in patients with ascites should not be delayed comparable to patients with acute variceal bleeding. The presented study aims to analyse the concept of early TIPS implantation in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Cirrhosis
  • Ascites Hepatic
  • Portal Hypertension

Keywords

  • liver cirrhosis
  • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
  • ascites
  • MELD
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,298 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 338 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 134 is above the median of 78 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Freiburg is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients eligible for inclusion in this trial must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years and \< 80 years
  2. Liver cirrhosis as documented by previous liver or by a combination of typical clinical, biochemical and sonographic features
  3. Ascites as the first single decompensating event with grade 2 ascites and MELD ≥ 15 OR grade 3 ascites
  4. ≤ 1.5
  5. Ability to understand the nature of the trial and the trial related procedures and to comply with them

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients eligible for this trial must not meet any of the following criteria:

  1. Treatment or recurrent ascites at the time of study inclusion
  2. Patients with concomitant variceal bleeding fulfilling the criteria for pre-emptive TIPS implantation ( class C \< 14 points or Child-Pugh class B >7 with active bleeding at initial endoscopy or hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] > 20 mmHg at the time of bleeding)
  3. Budd-Chiari syndrome
  4. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT)
  5. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP)
  6. Uncontrolled systemic infection (defined as an increase of > 20% if inflammatory parameters [C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, leukocytes] and/or sepsis as a reason for development of ascites
  7. Cardiac cirrhosis (defined as the development of liver cirrhosis in a patient with cardiac heart failure due to primary cardiac disease)
  8. Clinical significant cardiac disease ( ≥II)
  9. Untreated valvular heart disease: middle to high-grade valve stenosis or insufficiency (applies to mitral, tricuspid, aortic and pulmonary valves)
  10. Diastolic dysfunction grade III, stated by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
  11. Reduced ≤50%
  12. Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 45 mmHg)
  13. > 3 mg/dl
  14. Obstructive cholestasis
  15. Hepatorenal syndrome type AKI (HRS-AKI)
  16. Acute on chronic liver failure
  17. Benign liver tumor within the potential puncture tract
  18. Patient after liver transplantation
  19. Prior TIPS implantation
  20. Ongoing and/or recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (grade >II)
  21. Active tumor disease including hepatocellular carcinoma defined as need for chemotherapy, radiation therapy, interventional or surgical treatment
  22. New onset of antiviral treatment for chronic virus (HBV) infection within the last 3 months
  23. Untreated chronic virus (HCV) infection
  24. \<1 year
  25. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  26. Patients without the legal capacity who are unable to understand the nature, significance and consequences of the study
  27. Simultaneous participation in other interventional trials which could interfere with this trial; simultaneous participation in registry and diagnostic trials is allowed
  28. Person who is in a relationship of dependence/employment with the sponsor or the investigator
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
134 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

    Patients will receive TIPS implantation if ascites as the first single decompensating event with grade 2 ascites and MELD ≥ 15 OR grade 3 ascites occurs.

    Procedure: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

  • No intervention
    Standard medical treatment

    Patients in this group will receive standard medical treatment according to the current EASL guidelines (salt restriction, diuretic treatment, carvedilol, large-volume paracentesis if necessary, albumin substitution if more than 5 litre of ascites is removed)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

    TIPS implantation is performed by creating a shunt between the liver vein and the portal vein to enable portal pressure reduction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Transplantation-free survival (TFS)

    The primary objective of this study is to assess a survival benefit in patients with early allocation to TIPS implantation in comparison to patients with standard medical treatment (SMT).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to ascites with need for paracenteses

    Assessment of the duration until the next paracentesis after randomisation occurs to compare the efficacy of TIPS implantation compared to standard medical treatment.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months

  2. Assessment of quality of life

    Quality of life assessed with the SF-36 and CLDQ (chronic liver disease questionnaire) before TIPS implantation/study inclusion, 6 and 12 months after randomisation.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year: at study inclusion, at 6 and 12 months after randomisation

  3. Rate of TIPS implantation in the standard medical treatment group

    Need for TIPS implantation (recurrent ascites or variceal bleeding) in the standard medical treatment group.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months

  4. Rate of TIPS dysfunction

    Development of TIPS dysfunction in the TIPS group

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bettinger D, Janoschke M, Jenkner C, Kaufmann M, van Gessel J, Otter HH, Schultheiss M, Thimme R; on behalf of the eTIPS study group. Early implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites (eTIPS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Oct 2;26(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09038-8. PubMed 41039580 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2029, 45 months after the start.

Of 207 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Liver Cirrhosis, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 73. This study's planned 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 216 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2024
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
StartActual
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 15, 2029
CompletionEst.
Feb 15, 2029
Last update
May 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06576934
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Freiburg
Collaborators
Jena University Hospital, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, University Hospital Muenster, University Hospital, Bonn, University Hospital Munich, Hannover Medical School, University of Leipzig, University Hospital, Aachen, University Hospital Lübeck, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Dominik Bettinger (Principal Investigator, University Hospital Freiburg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 15, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Dominik Bettinger, MD
Contact
dominik.bettinger@uniklinik-freiburg.de
+4976127036870
Marco Janoschke, PhD
Contact
marco.janoschke@uniklinik-freiburg.de
+4976127077831

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion