ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06560476APEXUpdated Jul 10, 2026

OPtilume™ BPH Catheter SystEm for Treatment of Men eXperiencing Symptomatic BPH

An observational study in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, sponsored by Urotronic Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 8 sites in United States. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Urotronic Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

APEX is a prospective multi-site registry of real-world experience with the Optilume™ BPH Catheter System for treatment of men experiencing symptomatic BPH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • BPH
  • Drug Coated Balloon
  • DCB
  • Prostate
  • LUTS
  • Optilume
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

827 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 179 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 250 across 177 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Urotronic Inc. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Men experiencing symptomatic BPH that are seeking the Optilume drug coated catheter system.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System in accordance with the Instructions for Use (IFU).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwilling to abstain from sexual intercourse or use a condom for 30 days post-procedure and utilize a highly effective for at least 12 months post-procedure
  2. Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter, penile prosthesis, or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate
  3. Confirmed or suspected of prostate or bladder.
  4. Active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  5. Anatomy (e.g., presence of false passage or size of meatus) is not suitable for treatment with the Optilume BPH Catheter System
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Study Arm

    This is the data collection study arm. There is no other arm in the study.

    Other: Data collection

Interventions

  • OtherData collection

    Subject's data will be collected from patients that are undergoing care using the Optilume drug-coated catheter system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary efficacy endpoint is the average IPSS change from baseline to 12 months.

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the average IPSS change from baseline to 12 months. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) can be utilized to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. It is a validated, reproducible scoring system to assess disease severity and response to therapy. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms. It is not a reliable diagnostic tool for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of BPH, but can be used to quantitatively measure LUTS after a diagnosis is made.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  2. The primary safety endpoint is the freedom from treatment-related adverse SAEs.

    The primary safety endpoint is the freedom from treatment-related adverse SAEs.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency and severity of treatment-related AEs

    Adverse events will be collected and assessed for relatedness to the device and the procedure as well as for severity. The Clavien-Dindo severity grading scale is a commonly used criteria in the urology community.

    Time frame: From baseline to through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  2. Change in IPSS over time

    The IPSS tool is the most commonly reported symptom score for obstructive urinary symptoms secondary to BPH. Average IPSS scores, absolute change from baseline, and percent change from baseline will be reported at each follow-up timepoint. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) can be utilized to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. It is a validated, reproducible scoring system to assess disease severity and response to therapy. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms. It is not a reliable diagnostic tool for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of BPH, but can be used to quantitatively measure LUTS after a diagnosis is made.

    Time frame: From baseline to through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  3. Change in Qmax (mL per second) over time

    Uroflowmetry represents an objective measure of relief of obstruction. Average peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and change from baseline will be reported at each follow-up timepoint. Uroflowmetry assesses flow pattern, flow curve shape, maximum urinary flow (Qmax), voided volume (VV), voiding time (VT), PVR volume (PVR). A minimum of 150ml is required to provide an accurate assessment in men

    Time frame: From baseline to through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  4. Change in PVR over time

    Residual urine in the bladder due to incomplete emptying is an important clinical consideration in subjects with obstructive BPH. Average PVR and change from baseline will be reported at each follow-up timepoint. Post-void residual volume (PVR) is the amount of urine retained in the bladder after a voluntary void and functions as a diagnostic tool. A PVR can be used to assess many disease processes, including but not limited to neurogenic bladder, cauda equina syndrome, urinary outlet obstruction, mechanical obstruction, medication-induced urinary retention, postoperative urinary retention, and urinary tract infections. The PVR may be determined through urinary catheterization, a portable dedicated bladder scanner, or a formal ultrasound examination.

    Time frame: From baseline to through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  5. Freedom from repeat intervention (time-to-event)

    The proportion of subjects free from repeat surgical or endoscopic intervention for BPH will be reported over time utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From baseline to through study completion, an average of 2 years.

07

Study locations

8 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 74 observational studies under Prostatic Hyperplasia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 20, 2024
First posted
Aug 19, 2024
StartActual
Mar 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06560476
Lead sponsor
Urotronic Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 30, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion