ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06544122Updated Aug 15, 2024

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Voice

An interventional study of Transcranial direct current stimulation in Voice and Resonance Disorders, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Voice Disturbance, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered Jul 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the effect on the voice of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in vocally healthy non-singers. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the brain area in which tDCS promotes better vocal performance in vocally healthy individuals? Each participants received anodal tDCS applied at an intensity of 2 mA for a duration of 20 minutes for tDCS stimulations in different areas with a 7-day washout period between stimulations. Vocal assessments was conducted before and after the intervention. The targeted places were the primary motor cortex (M1), primary somatosensory cortex (S1), Cerebellum, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

Read the detailed description

Recently, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques , including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been employed to enhance vocal skills. tDCS can be used to temporarily and reversibly modulate brain functions and is an increasingly popular tool for investigating the relationships between the brain and behavior . The aim of the present study is investigate the effect of tDCS applied to different areas on the voice of vocally healthy non-singers. This is a randomized crossover clinical trial, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco, number 5,758,856. Vocally healthy people from the city of Recife and its Metropolitan Region, aged between 18 and 45 years, participated in the study.Each participant underwent four tDCS stimulations in different areas with a 7-day washout period between stimulations to study their vocal assessments before and after tDCS. The targeted places were the primary motor cortex (M1), primary somatosensory cortex (S1), Cerebellum, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). All participants were subjected to voice acessments analysis immediately before and after tDCS application in each area. Data normality will be analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, rejecting the hypothesis of normal distribution when p\<0.05. ANOVA will be applied to design repeated measures in case of normality and in the existence of asymmetric data, Friedmann's ANOVA will be used for repeated measures. For the comparison of values before and after application of the technique and between modes of execution of the technique (with and without non-invasive neuromodulation), tests will be applied for related and independent samples, respectively, with a significance level of 5%

02

Conditions studied

  • Voice and Resonance Disorders
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • Voice Disturbance

Keywords

  • transcranial direct current stimulation
  • voice
  • speech therapy
03

In context

Voice Disorders

77 studies on the registry are indexed under Voice Disorders; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 41 across 54 interventional studies indexed under Voice Disorders.

Browse Voice Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-singers with healthy voice

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers
  • Those who present signs and symptoms of laryngeal, pharyngeal or respiratory diseases at the time of collection
  • Volunteers who make regular use of neuroactive drugs
  • Those who have metallic implants or a pacemaker
  • People that have any history of seizures or epilepsy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Effects on voice of M1 tDCS in healthy voice volunteers

    The aim of this arm is to verify the effect on the voice of anodal tDCS M1 larynx target.

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Effects on voice of S1 tDCS in vocally health volunteers

    The aim of this arm is to verify the effect on the voice of anodal tDCS S1 larynx target.

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Effects on voice of PFDLC tDCS in vocally health volunteers

    The aim of this arm is to verify the effect on the voice of anodal tDCS PFDLC target.

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Effects on voice of cerebellum tDCS in vocally health volunteers

    The aim of this arm is to verify the effect on the voice of anodal tDCS cerebellum target.

    Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial direct current stimulation

    Anodal tDCS will be applied at an intensity of 2mA and duration of 20 minutes. The assembly of the electrodes during the tDCS sessions will be carried out as follows: primary motor cortex, the stimulation electrode (anode) will be positioned on C5 (international EEG 10-20 system), in S1 (2cm posterior to C5), at the PFCDL (Fp3), all with the cathode positioned on the region contralateral supraorbital. For cerebellar tDCS the anode will be positioned on the inion area and the cathode on the deltoide muscle.

    Also known as: tDCS, transcranial electrical stimulation, anodal stimulation tDCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vocal range profile

    Min f0 (Hz) Max f0 (Hz) Ext f0 (Hz) Ext (ST) Mín int (dB) Max int (dB) Area (%) Min f0 (Hz) Max f0 (Hz) Ext f0 (Hz) Ext (ST) Mín int (dB) Max int (dB) Area (%) Minimum f0 (Hz); Maximum f0 (Hz); Extension f0; Extension in St; Minimum intensity (dB); Maximum intensity (dB); Area (%)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Voice

    Jitter (%); Shimmer (%); Irregularity; GNE; DAI

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Laryngeal diadochokinesis

    Change in the task of producing vowels separately, with rapid repetition of each vowel as quickly as possible for eight seconds

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  3. Vocal effort

    The Adapted Borg CR10 for Vocal Effort Ratings (BR) maintained a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no vocal effort at all", and 10 "maximum vocal effort". First, the participants have to reproduce a note played on a virtual keyboard (3 tones below their maximum glissando frequency) and sustain the note while counting from 21 to 30, immediately afterwards, the participants answered the Adapted Borg CR10 for Vocal Effort Ratings (BR).

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laboratório de Neurociência Aplicada
    Recife, Pernambuco 50740-560, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Behroozmand R, Johari K, Bridwell K, Hayden C, Fahey D, den Ouden DB. Modulation of vocal pitch control through high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the left ventral motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jun;238(6):1525-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05832-9. Epub 2020 May 23. PubMed 32447409 ↗
  • Peng D, Lin Q, Chang Y, Jones JA, Jia G, Chen X, Liu P, Liu H. A Causal Role of the Cerebellum in Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Production. Cerebellum. 2021 Aug;20(4):584-595. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01230-1. Epub 2021 Feb 8. PubMed 33555544 ↗
  • Thair H, Holloway AL, Newport R, Smith AD. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Beginner's Guide for Design and Implementation. Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;11:641. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00641. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29213226 ↗
  • Wang B, Xiao S, Yu C, Zhou J, Fu W. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Physical Training on the Excitability of the Motor Cortex, Physical Performance, and Motor Learning: A Systematic Review. Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 9;15:648354. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.648354. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33897361 ↗
  • Perikova E, Blagovechtchenski E, Filippova M, Shcherbakova O, Kirsanov A, Shtyrov Y. Anodal tDCS over Broca's area improves fast mapping and explicit encoding of novel vocabulary. Neuropsychologia. 2022 Apr 15;168:108156. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108156. Epub 2022 Jan 10. PubMed 35026217 ↗
  • Cardoso NSV, Lucena JA, de Lira ZS, de Vasconcelos SJ, Lopes LW, Gomes AOC. Do Flexible Silicone Tubes Immersed in Water Combined With Vocalise Improve the Immediate Effect on Voice? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4535-4562. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00629. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PubMed 34762812 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 8 months.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Voice Disorders, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 48. This study's 8 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2024
First posted
Aug 9, 2024
StartActual
Mar 30, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 12, 2023
CompletionActual
Apr 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06544122
Responsible party
Kátia Monte-Silva (Clinical professor, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2024
Start date
Mar 30, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2023
Completion
Apr 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 15, 2024

Study contacts

kelly Greyce SC Oliveira, PhD student
principal investigator · UFPE

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion