A Phase 2 interventional study of Methotrexate Injection and Methotrexate Infusion in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy and Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment, sponsored by Cincinnati Eye Institute, Southwest Ohio. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.
Sponsored by Cincinnati Eye Institute, Southwest Ohio · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
I. Title Prevention of ProliFerative Vitreoretinopathy with Intravitreal MethotreXate in Primary Retinal DEtachment Repair (FIXER) Trial
V. Research Summary
Purpose:
To evaluate methotrexate for the prevention of PVR after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.
Methods:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Study Design and Randomization This prospective double masked trial will randomize patients into four groups in a 1:1:1:1 fashion. All attending surgeons and patients will be masked to group randomization. Randomization into four groups will occur on the day of surgery by the Cincinnati Eye Institute's pharmacist, Deepali Chachare. Group A will consist of ≥ 150 patients receiving intraoperative infusion with balanced salt solution containing methotrexate (40mg/500mL BSS), and methotrexate intravitreal injections (400mcg/0.05mL) at postoperative weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10. Group B will consist of ≥ 150 patients receiving intraoperative balanced salt solution infusion containing methotrexate, and sham intravitreal injections at postoperative weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10. Group C will consist of ≥ 150 patients receiving a balanced salt solution infusion without methotrexate, and methotrexate injections at postoperative weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10. Group D will consist of ≥ 150 patients receiving intraoperative balanced salt solution infusion without methotrexate, and sham intravitreal injections at postoperative weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10.
I. Title Prevention of ProliFerative Vitreoretinopathy with Intravitreal MethotreXate in Primary Retinal DEtachment Repair (FIXER) Trial
IV. General Study Information ing on the surgeon and technique, successful retinal reattachment rates range from 70-80% for PR, and even higher with SB and/or PPV.10 Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), the formation of proliferative fibrocellular membranous tissue overlying the retina, can cause contracture and subsequent recurrent tractional retinal detachment. PVR is the leading cause of failure following RRD repair, complicating 10% of routine RRD procedures and a higher fraction of RRD in the setting of higher risk scenarios and occurs approximately 4,000 times per year in the US.11,12 Risk factors for PVR formation, including duration of RRD, uveitis, myopia (≥ -5.00), lens status, number of retinal breaks, size of breaks, duration of photopsias/floaters/shadows, presence of macula detachment, giant retinal tears, vitreous hemorrhage, and history of trauma. These risk factors will all be collected. Intraoperative data collected will include vitrectomy gauge, use of a drainage retinotomy, use of scleral buckle, type of retinal tamponade (air, SF6, C3F8, or silicone oil), fellow surgeon involvement, duration of surgery, development of choroidal detachment, amount of laser spots, amount of laser energy, number of retinal breaks, total clock hours of retinal breaks, and surgical complications. Surgically removing PVR to reattach the retina can be exceedingly challenging, resulting in poor visual outcomes, with reattachment rates ranging from 60-80%.11 Furthermore, even with successful anatomic reattachment, only 40-80% of patients recover ambulatory vision or better.11 The most commonly cited classification system to grade PVR is the updated Retina Society Classification in 2016. This system describes PVR into grades A-C with increasing severity. Grade A PVR is described as haziness in the vitreous haze or clumps of pigment, representing the migration of RPE cells into the vitreous. Grade B is described wrinkling of the retinal surface, rolled edges of a retinal tear, or retinal stiffness. Grade C-Posterior is described as a full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands posterior to equator. Grade C-Anterior is described as full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands anterior to equator, anterior displacement, and condensed vitreous strands.13
As of this writing, there are no prospective human studies demonstrating that a prophylactic medication can successfully prevent PVR. PVR prevention represents a significant unmet medical need. Methotrexate's proven antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory properties make it a promising candidate for prevention of PVR. Methotrexate exerts several anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative biochemical mechanisms, including competitive antagonism of dihydrofolate reductase, inhibition of purine and pyrimidine synthesis, transmethylation reactions, and nitric oxide production.14 Moreover, methotrexate has long been used to treat intraocular lymphoma and refractory uveitis, with an established intraocular dosing regimen and excellent intraocular safety profiles as described above.
Based on these long established - now standard of care - protocols in the ocular oncology and uveitis literature, a rational dosing strategy for our study of methotrexate for PBVR prevention was established as follows. The standard intravitreal dose of methotrexate for primary intraocular lymphoma and refractory posterior uveitis is 400mcg into an approximately 5mL eye. Dosing regimens for these two diseases are typically two injections per week for 1 month, 1 injection per week for 2 months and 1 injection per month for 9 additional months. Extensive off-label clinical experience by our group with methotrexate for PVR prevention in high-risk scenarios (going back to 2006) has led our group to believe that this very aggressive dosing regimen is not needed for a substantial anti PVR effect. Furthermore, the well documented side effect of corneal toxicity is much less frequent at a less aggressive dosing regimen and to that end we have adapted the following dosing strategy. During vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment repair, 40mg of methotrexate is placed into a 500mL bottle of BSS intraocular irrigation solution yielding and identical final intraocular concentration of methotrexate that is equal to a 400mcg injection into a 5 mL eyeball. Methotrexate is a small and readily soluble molecule so an equilibrium of therapeutic tissue concentrations is achieved quickly. Following the aqueous phase of retinal detachment surgery, the (methotrexate containing) BSS infusion is turned off, all intraocular BSS is removed and replaced with a vitreous fill of either air, gas, or silicon oil. The resulting dramatically altered distribution volume of any water-soluble drug makes intraoperative injection dosing at the end of the surgical case very problematic. The intraoperative infusion methodology eliminates these concerns and doses the eye at the time when surgical manipulation and injury (which are felt to be causative factors in PVR formation) occur. We selected the intraoperative intraocular infusion strategy because of the direct and controlled ocular drug delivery, the ease of this dosing strategy, the simplicity of masking both the surgeon and patient (with an opaquer plastic bag covering the infusion bottle), and the elimination of systemic side effect concerns. Our postoperative injection regimen of 400mcg intravitreal injections - one, three, six, and ten weeks postoperatively - was developed to: 1) provide greatest antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects closer to the period of surgical injury, 2) maintain persistent effects through the typical PVR formation window of 4 - 8 weeks after surgery, and 3) minimize the corneal toxicity of accumulating methotrexate exposure. Our group has published and presented convincing evidence that both intraoperative infusion and postoperative injection dosing have clinical efficacy. It remains to be elucidated whether the infusion approach, the injection approach or a combination of both are needed for optimal effect. This is the underlying rationale for the 1:1:1:1 randomization strategy into four groups.
Detailed Study Visit Description
The Study will consist of 11 visits spread out over about 12 months. These are summarized in the table attached below. In order:
Visit Number -1 (Preop / screening): 1 - 14 days prior to surgery This is the visit at which the patient\'s retinal detachment will be diagnosed and the surgical plan for repair established.
Snellen visual acuity and (optional) ETDRS visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. The patient will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential The detained geometry of the retinal detachment and associated retinal pathologies will be recorded Recording of PVR risk factors Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy The patient will sign the clinic based informed consent to proceed with surgery.
If the patient meets the inclusion criteria for the trial, the patient will be invited to participate in the trial and be given the study informed consent document to review.
The patient will be tentatively randomized into one of the 4 study groups to aid with preoperative work flow and possible methotrexate preparation requirements for surgery.
Visit Number 0 (Surgery):
The ambulatory surgery center informed consent to treat will be signed Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential The study informed consent document is signed by the patient. The patient will be definitively randomized into one of the 4 study groups. Vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment repair will be performed The detained geometry of the retinal detachment and associated retinal pathologies will be recorded Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy
Visit Number 1 (Postop Day 1):
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects
Visit Number 2 (Postop Week 1) ± 3 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential Sham or real methotrexate injection according to patient study group randomization by unmasked investigator
Visit Number 3 (Postop Week 3) ± 3 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential Sham or real methotrexate injection according to patient study group randomization by unmasked investigator
Visit Number 4 (Postop Week 6) ± 7 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential Sham or real methotrexate injection according to patient study group randomization by unmasked investigator
Visit Number 5 (Postop Week 10) ± 7 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects Pregnancy screen and contraception discussion as appropriate for patients of child bearing potential Sham or real methotrexate injection according to patient study group randomization by unmasked investigator
Visit Number 6 (Postop Month 4) ± 14 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects
Visit Number 7 (Postop Month 6) ± 28 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects
Visit Number 8 (Postop Month 9) ± 28 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects
Visit Number 9 (Postop Month 12) ± 28 days:
Snellen visual acuity will be obtained ETDRS visual acuity will be obtained IOP will be determined Slit lamp exam and dilated fundus exam will be performed and recorded. Recording of presence of PVR and or ERM Recording of presence of corneal epitheliopathy Recording of other ocular methotrexate side effects
VI. Statistical Analysis All data will be tabulated on a secure Microsoft Excel document. All information will be stored on a password protected Cincinnati Eye Institute computer on its secure HIPPA compliant network. Only study investigators will have password access to this secure spreadsheet. An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) table will be generated for each variable to determine statistical significance (p \< 0.05).
Statistical power calculations show that an N of 215 patients in each group will allow for detection of a reduction in PVR rate from 10% to 5% and an N of 50 patients will allow for detection of a reduction in PVR rate from 10% to 1% so this study should be fully recruited in approximately 1 year given current patient volumes.
43 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative; 11 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 860 is above the median of 64 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative.
Browse Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative studies →Cincinnati Eye Institute, Southwest Ohio is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
receiving no methotrexate
Drug: Sham Injection
receiving standard surgery without intraoperative methotrexate followed by postoperative 400µg intravitreal methotrexate injections 1, 3, 6, and 10 weeks after surgery.
Drug: Methotrexate Injection
receiving surgery with intraoperative intraocular methotrexate infusion as described above and postoperative sham injections.
Drug: Methotrexate Infusion
receiving both intraoperative intraocular methotrexate infusion and postoperative 400µg intravitreal methotrexate injections 1, 3, 6, and 10 weeks after surgery.
Drug: Methotrexate Injection · Drug: Methotrexate Infusion
Methotrexate injection
Methotrexate Infusion
Sham Injection
Primary Outcome Measure
Percentage of patients achieving single Surgery Success rate for primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment repair in each group.
Time frame: Month 12
number of retinal detachment repair reoperations
Comparison of number of retinal detachment repair reoperations between study groups
Time frame: 12 months
Visual Acuity
Mean final Visual Acuity within and between study groups
Time frame: 12 months
Time to Re-detachment from PVR
Time to Re-detachment from PVR
Time frame: 12 months
methotrexate-associated corneal epitheliopathy
number of patients developing methotrexate-associated corneal epitheliopathy
Time frame: 12 months
Complications
Rate of development of complications (epiretinal membrane formation, endophthalmitis, other ophthalmic surgeries)
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of PVR
Incidence of PVR amongst the study groups
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 57 months after the start.
Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 29, 2026: primary completion Jun 2025 → Dec 2028 and completion Jun 2026 → Dec 2028.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Methotrexate
Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative →
Cincinnati Eye Institute, Southwest Ohio