ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06541002SHIFTUpdated Mar 19, 2026

A Novel Digital Application (SHIFT) to Improve Outcomes for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors

An interventional study of SHIFT Intervention Group and Enhanced Usual Care Group in Sexual Dysfunction, Stem Cell Transplant Complications and Bone Marrow Transplant Complications, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-19.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study is evaluating the efficacy of a novel self-administered digital application for improving sexual health outcomes, quality of life, and psychological distress in hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors.

Read the detailed description

Autologous and Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) are potentially curative treatments for many patients with hematologic malignancies and benign hematologic conditions. The use of HCT has increased over the last decade. HCT survivors experience a substantial and drastic deterioration in their sexual function that persists for many years post-HCT. Sexual dysfunction is the most common long-term complication in HCT survivors. Sexual health problems have negative consequences on patients' quality of life (QOL) and mood, including the individual's identity and self-esteem, fatigue, relationship discord, intimacy problems, and distress. The etiology of sexual dysfunction in HCT survivors is multi-factorial, and can stem from biological, interpersonal, psychological, and social factors. Given the multi-factorial nature underlying sexual dysfunction in this population, a multimodal approach is required to address them. Clinicians lack sufficient training to address sexual health problems in HCT survivors. HCT survivors report having little communication with their clinicians about sexual health. HCT survivors would benefit from interventions to empower them to communicate with their clinicians about their sexual health.

Despite the well-documented burden of sexual dysfunction in HCT survivors, interventions tailored to address their unique sexual health concerns are lacking. Given the multi-factorial nature of sexual health concerns in HCT survivors, interventions must address these diverse needs, and should therefore ideally be addressed by a multidisciplinary team of sexual health experts, psychologists, gynecologists, and urologists. Although a few transplant centers have a multidisciplinary sexual health clinic, the lack of professionals trained in addressing sexual health concerns severely limits the dissemination of such a complex service model. In addition, HCT survivors often find it difficult to attend multiple clinic appointments and coordinate their care among various specialists. Limited availability of sexual health clinicians also hinders the scalability and dissemination of sexual health interventions to address the needs of HCT survivors. Digital health interventions can enhance access and broad dissemination of psychological and supportive care interventions and will enable patients to access the intervention in the privacy of their home given the sensitivity of the topic, engage their partners with the content, and avoid additional clinic visits. A successful evidence-based sexual health intervention was adapted to a digital app for HCT survivors. The active components of an in-person sexual health intervention for HCT survivors were leveraged to develop the self-administered digital application, Sexual Health and Intimacy Following Transplant (SHIFT) to address the sexual health concerns of HCT survivors. This multi-site randomized trial will test the efficacy SHIFT for improving sexual health outcomes, quality of life, and psychological distress in HCT survivors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Stem Cell Transplant Complications
  • Bone Marrow Transplant Complications
03

In context

Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

385 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 72 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological.

Browse Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent or allogeneic HCT > three months prior to study enrollment
  • Screen positive for sexual health concerns causing distress based on the National Comprehensive Network (NCCN) survivorship guidelines screening questions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not comprehend English or Spanish since SHIFT will only be available in these two languages for this efficacy trial.
  • Patients with any major uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or other comorbid cognitive conditions, which the treating HCT clinician believes would prohibit the patients' capacity to provide and participate in study procedures.
  • Patients with disease requiring treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SHIFT Intervention Group

    SHIFT is a self-administered, multi-component digital application for HCT survivors, incorporating several features to promote engagement and health behavior change, and includes gamification strategies, videos of HCT survivors, intimacy exercises, and optional content.

    Behavioral: SHIFT Intervention Group

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Usual Care Group

    Patients assigned to enhanced usual care group will not receive access to the SHIFT application. They will meet with their HCT clinician and maybe referred to specialist care at the patients' request or at the discretion of the HCT clinician.

    Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralSHIFT Intervention Group

    Participants assigned to SHIFT will meet with their HCT clinician for a brief medical examination to assess the need for medications for erectile dysfunction, vaginal atrophy, or genital graft-versus-host disease; and start using SHIFT at their desired pace over 8 weeks to complete five modules.

  • BehavioralEnhanced Usual Care Group

    Participants assigned to the enhanced usual care group will meet with their HCT clinician for a brief medical examination to assess the need for medications for erectile dysfunction, vaginal atrophy, or genital graft-versus-host disease; and maybe referred to a psychologist, urologist, or gynecologist at the participants' request or at the discretion of the HCT clinician.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global satisfaction with sex at week 8 as measured by the global satisfaction with sex domain from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Satisfaction with Sex Life scale.

    To compare patient global satisfaction with sex scores at week 8 after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the PROMIS global satisfaction with sex domain from the PROMIS Scale v2.0 Satisfaction with Sex Life. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with sex life, and lower scores indicate less satisfaction with sex life.

    Time frame: Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global satisfaction with sex (longitudinally) as measured by the global satisfaction with sex domain from the PROMIS Satisfaction with Sex Life scale

    To compare patient global satisfaction with sex longitudinally between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the global satisfaction with sex domain from the PROMIS Scale v2.0 Satisfaction with Sex Life scale. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with sex life, and lower scores indicate less satisfaction with sex life.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  2. Sexual interest as measured by the interest in sexual activity domain from the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction scale

    To compare sexual interest both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the interest in sexual activity domain from the PROMIS Scale v2.0 Sexual Function and Satisfaction scale. Higher scores indicate more interest, and lower scores indicate less interest.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  3. Sexual function (orgasm) as measured by the by the Orgasm - Pleasure domain from the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction scale

    To compare sexual function (orgasm) both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the Orgasm - Pleasure domain from the PROMIS Scale v2.0 - Sexual Function and Satisfaction scale. Higher scores from the Orgasm - Pleasure domain from the PROMIS Scale - Sexual Function and Satisfaction indicate more pleasurable orgasms.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  4. Sexual function (vaginal discomfort, and vaginal lubrication) as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index scale

    To compare sexual function (vaginal discomfort, and vaginal lubrication) both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for female participants. Higher scores of FSFI indicate greater levels of sexual functioning and lower scores indicate lower levels of sexual functioning.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  5. Erectile function as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function scale

    To compare erectile function both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) for male participants. Higher scores of IIEF-5 indicate greater levels of sexual functioning and lower scores indicate lower levels of sexual functioning.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  6. Quality of Life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Bone Marrow Transplant scale

    To compare quality of life (QOL) both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale. Higher scores on FACT-BMT indicate better QOL.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  7. Anxiety symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    To compare anxiety symptoms both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety subscale. Lower scores on HADS anxiety subscale indicate less anxiety (score: 0-7-Normal, 8-10-Mild, 11-15-Moderate, 16-21-Severe).

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  8. Depression symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    To compare depression symptoms both at week 8 and longitudinally after enrollment between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression subscale. Lower scores on HADS depression subscale indicate absence of depression (score: 0-7-Normal, 8-10-Mild, 11-15-Moderate, 16-21-Severe).

    Time frame: Up to week-24

Other outcomes

  1. The proportion of participants who are sexually active using the PROMIS Sexual Activity Screener

    To compare the proportion of participants who are sexually active between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care as measured by the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction (SexFS) Version 2.0: Screener.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  2. Emotional and sexual intimacy as measured by the emotional and sexual intimacy subscales in Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationship scale

    To compare emotional and sexual intimacy between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care using the emotional and sexual intimacy subscales from the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationship (PAIR) emotional and sexual intimacy subscales. Lower scores indicate greater relationship intimacy, and higher scores indicate lower relationship intimacy.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

  3. To compare participants' self-efficacy for discussing sexual health with their transplant clinicians using the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    To compare participants' self-efficacy for discussing their sexual health with their transplant clinician's between those receiving SHIFT versus enhanced usual care using the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. This will be assessed using two items with score ranging from 0-20. Higher scores indicate better self-efficacy, and lower scores indicate lesser self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Up to week-24

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to Sponsor Investigator or designee. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

Access criteria: Contact the Mass General Brigham Innovation team

Data sharing details ↗ · www.massgeneralbrigham.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2029, 51 months after the start.

Of 100 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 51 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 112 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2024
First posted
Aug 7, 2024
StartActual
Jan 27, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2030
Last update
Mar 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06541002
Responsible party
El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D. (Associate Professor of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2024
Start date
Jan 27, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 19, 2026

Study contacts

Areej El-Jawahri, MD
Contact
ael-jawahri@mgb.org
617-724-4000
Sajeewani Samarakoon, PhD
Contact
ssamarakoon@mgh.harvard.edu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion