An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease and Exercise Addiction, sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-29.
Sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital · Observational
This research is comparing the effects of interval and continuous training which are the two types of aerobic training on persons' life quality and exercise capacity on coronary artery disease patients.
The participants are diagnosed coronary artery disease aged between 40- 80 and have no mental and physical disability to take part in research. The participants' demographic infos and clinical story were recorded. To evaluate exercise capacity we used the symptom-limited exercise test (ETT) and six minute walking test (6DYT). We evaluate the life quality by using Short Form-36 (SF-36).
All those evaluation tests are done before and after training. Participants are randomly divided into two groups, the first group took part in interval aerobic training (AAE) while the other group was joining in continuous training (SAE) three times a week during 6 weeks. In both groups, significant changes were found in ETT, test time and 6 DYT scores after the rehabilitation program (p\<0,05). But only AAE group have important statistical values comparing to SAE group on test time and 6DYT scores. After training SAE group showed significant statistical change in every SF-36 parameter, while AAE group showing significant values except energy/fatigue. AAE group have statistically significant changes comparing to SAE group on that parameters; physical function, role limitations due to physical function, role limitations due to emotional function and general health (p\<0,05). Consequently AAE is much more tolerable comparing to SAE and AAE is considered more effective in increasing some parameters. On the other hand, we observed that both training types can be used in cardiac rehabilitation safely.
5,676 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 958 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 335 across 1,978 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Istanbul Medipol University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Name-Surname, age, sex, body-weight index, educational status, married/single/divorced, job and clinical background (If has any surgery and myocardial infarction)
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
humans that diagnosed as coronary artery disease, joined two aerobic exercise groups. One of this group includes interval exercise and the other one includes continuous exercise.
Other: Physiotherapy and rehabilitation
The aerobic exercise is very crucial part of cardiac rehabilitation. This study compares the effects of interval and continuous training which are the two types of aerobic training on persons' life quality and exercise capacity diagnosed coronary artery disease patients.
the effect of intermittent and continuous aerobic exercise on exercise capacity
we used the symptom-limited exercise test and six minute walking test (6DYT). All evaluation tests are done before and after training. Participants were into randomised two groups: interval aerobic training (AAE) and continuous aerobic training (SAE). Training lasted three times a week during 6 weeks. In both groups, significant changes were found in evaluation tests scores after the rehabilitation program (p\<0,05). But only AAE group have important statistical difference comparing to SAE group on test time and 6DYT scores.
Time frame: 30 minutes 3 times a week during 6 weeks
the effect of intermittent and continuous aerobic exercise on life quality
The participants have no mental and physical disability to join in research. The participants' demographic infos and clinical story were recorded.We evaluate the life quality by using Short Form-36 (SF-36). All evaluation tests are done before and after training. Participants were into randomised two groups: interval aerobic training (AAE) and continuous aerobic training (SAE).After training SAE group showed significant statistical change in every SF-36 parameter, while AAE group showing significant values except energy/fatigue. AAE group have statistically significant changes comparing to SAE group on that parameters; physical function, role limitations due to physical function, role limitations due to emotional function and general health (p\<0,05). Consequently AAE is much more tolerable comparing to SAE and AAE is considered more effective in increasing some parameters. On the other hand, we observed that both training types can be used in cardiac rehabilitation safely.
Time frame: 30 minutes 3 times a week during 6 weeks
Plan to share: Yes — Cardiac rehabilitation is very popular at nowadays and which type exercise good on cardiac rehabilitation is not known exactly
Supporting information: Clinical study report
Time frame: 2 years
Access criteria: karacaoglugulay@gmail.com
Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 10 months.
Of 726 non-industry observational studies under Coronary Artery Disease, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 122. This study's 10 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 857 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 88.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital →