CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06522789Updated Jul 30, 2024

Preoperative Corneal Measurements Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking

An interventional study of corneal cross-linking procedure in Keratoconus, sponsored by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital. Completed at 1 site in North Macedonia. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-30.

Sponsored by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2018, registered Jul 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
11 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus.

Read the detailed description

A prospective, partially masked, semi-randomised, interventional clinical trial was undertaken between April 2018 and July 2023 in the refractive surgery department of the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje.

The patients' examination before the treatment and on every follow-up was a meticulous process that included assessment of CDVA (Aitomu LCD Digital Vision Eye Chart, Shanghai, China), refraction, tonometry, and corneal characteristics using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), biomicroscopy and dilated fundus examination. Corneal topography, thickness distribution, and COD profiles were captured for later analysis. The COD profile, which describes the turbidity of the cornea in the central apical region and the three concentric annular zones, was a vital part of the examination. The Pentacam software computed a figure, ranging from 0 (totally clear) to 100 (totally opaque), along a grey scale describing the optical density in each of the 12 regions. A higher number signifies increased turbidity and reduced transparency; a lower number represents the opposite. The software also averaged the total optical density in the apex, each concentric zone, each layer, and the cornea. A total of 20 COD values are generated for a single cornea. COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions are least likely to be affected by CXL. On all occasions, three consecutive Pentacam scans were taken in a dark room, and the best-quality scan was selected for recording and analysis. For each case, the COD (in greyscale units), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT, µ), anterior (ARC) and posterior (PRC) corneal radii of curvature(mm) values measured over a 3mm diameter zone covering the cone of the cornea were sequestered from the best scan.

The CXL procedure for group one adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each). Device testing was performed before every procedure, and irradiance density measured between 2.7-and-3.3 mW/cm2 was tolerated. At the end of the corneal CXL procedure, topical atropine 1% (Atropine Sulphate, Cooper, Athens, Greece), antibiotic (Tobrex, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops were instilled and a bandage soft contact lens (Air Optix Night \& Day Aqua, Alcon, Texas) was placed over the cornea. Peschke® D. Riboflavin used in the study group was a standard Riboflavin solution consisting of 0.1% Riboflavin diluted into 20% dextran 500. The soaking time was 20-30 minutes or until microscopy showed riboflavin particles in the anterior chamber. Tobradex (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) eyedrops, a suspension of 0.3% Tobramycine and 0.05% Dexamethasone were prescribed for application after CXL. The dosage was four times per day for the first two weeks, then tapered twice daily for the next two weeks, and then to one drop per day for the last two weeks. All patients received topical steroids for a total of 6 weeks.

The postoperative care was comprehensive, ensuring the patient's well-being and recovery. It included a combination of antibiotic/corticosteroid drops instilled four times daily for the next two weeks, after which the drops were tapered off gradually over six weeks. Postoperative examinations were scheduled for one day, four days, 1-week until epithelisation and bandage lens removal, then 1-,3-,6-months, and 1-year postoperatively. After that, the patients were advised to complete an ophthalmological examination at least yearly.

Data from the treated eye, or just the right eye in bilateral cases, were analysed. Details of CDVA, COD, TCT, ARC and PRC values were stored in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and analysed to determine the significance of any differences between groups (Mann Whitney U test or unpaired t-test) and changes occurring within each group (Friedman test or 1-way ANOVA for repeat measures, Wilcoxon signed rank or paired t-test). If significant changes were found, then the analysis would be extended to determine the significance of any association between the change (i.e., preop value-postop value) in the parameter and the value at the start of the study (Spearman's rho or Pearson correlation). Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the data would be further scrutinised to determine if a feasible model could be constructed (linear and multiple regression analysis) to predict the likely CDVA after CXL or after one year in untreated cases. Non-parametric tests were applied when data were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality). The changes and differences were considered statistically significant when p˂0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Keratoconus
  • cross-linking
  • corneal optical density
03

In context

Keratoconus

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 40 across 203 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Group 1 consisted of cases in which the astigmatism had increased by 1D or more, according to subjective refraction and corneal surface topography, over the previous year.

  • Group 2 subjects consisted of confirmed keratoconus without signs of progression who opted to continue with their prescription glasses and tear-enhancing drops where necessary
  • Group 3 is a control group of age- and gender-matched individuals without signs of keratoconus.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior corneal surgeries, pachymetry less than 400 microns, scars or cloudings of the cornea, chemical injuries, severe dry eye, delayed epithelial healing and any inflammatory eye surface process before the CXL procedure
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1

    The total number of patients who underwent CXL was seventy-seven; 23 were females, and 54 were males of the mean (±sd, range) age 24.2 (±7.0, 11-44) years.

    Procedure: corneal cross-linking procedure

  • No intervention
    Group 2

    Twenty-three patients, six females and 17 males of mean age 27.3 (±7.0, 17-44) years, were untreated.

  • No intervention
    Group 3

    Twenty-four subjects, nine females and 15 males of mean age 24.7 (±7.6, 17-45) years, were recruited as controls.

Interventions

  • Procedurecorneal cross-linking procedure

    Standard Dresden protocol corneal cross-linking procedure The CXL procedure adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period

    Associations between Corneal Optical Density, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Radius Curvature (ARC), Posterior Radius Curvature (PRC), ARC/PRC ratio, CDVA values at the start of the study and CDVA at postoperative.

    Time frame: one year

  2. Associations between predicted and actual CDVA following CXL

    The differences in the mean predicted values measured at six months and one year.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) changes in all three groups during the follow up

    Comparison of CDVA changes between the groups

    Time frame: one year

  2. Corneal Optical Density (COD) changes in all three groups during the follow up

    COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions were least likely to be affected by CXL.

    Time frame: one year

  3. Corneal thickness (TCT) changes in all three groups during the follow up.

    Comparison of TCT changes between the groups

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fanka Gilevska
    Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06522789
Lead sponsor
Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital
Responsible party
Fanka Gilevska (Principal investigator, Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 26, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2022
Completion
Jul 30, 2023
Last update
Jul 30, 2024

Study contacts

Fanka Gilevska, PhD cand
principal investigator · Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion