ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06521164USEPUREUpdated Mar 14, 2025

Usability of Pericardial Flushing with the Haermonics Pure System After Cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of Haermonics Pure system in Surgical Blood Loss and Surgical Complication, sponsored by Haermonics BV. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Haermonics BV · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the usability of the Haermonics Pure system in patients undergoing a cardiac surgery procedure with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

All measurements and interventions are standard of care, except pericardial flushing with the Haermonics Pure system.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical investigation of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Safety and efficacy of CPPF, with and without the device, has been established in comparison with standard drainage. Therefore, this study is designed primarily to establish the usability of the device and its accessories, not requiring randomization against a control group.

Because the Haermonics Pure system and its accessories are used directly after surgery for several hours up to several days until drain removal before being discharged from the hospital, it is sufficient to follow patients until discharge from the cardiac surgery department. For patients with a prolonged hospitalization because of postoperative complications, it is considered sufficient to follow patients for 2 weeks after surgery because the impact of a pericardial flushing and postoperative drainage on outcomes is critical within the immediate postoperative period but limited beyond the time that the drains are removed. For device-related adverse events, follow-up will continue until the event is considered resolved or the patient is discharged.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Blood Loss
  • Surgical Complication

Keywords

  • cardiac surgery
  • therapeutic irrigation
  • postoperative bleeding
  • chest tubes
  • Haermonics Pure System
03

In context

Blood Loss, Surgical

213 studies on the registry are indexed under Blood Loss, Surgical; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 65 is below the median of 80 across 160 interventional studies indexed under Blood Loss, Surgical.

Browse Blood Loss, Surgical studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Haermonics BV as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients (≥18yrs and weight ≥40kg) undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (CABG and/or valve surgery, elective aortic surgery, Bentall procedure, ascending aorto/aortic arch replacement) with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass
  2. Patient has been informed of the nature of the clinical investigation and is willing and able to give written for investigation participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Euroscore II > 20%
  2. Emergent procedures
  3. Complication during surgery which is life threatening and/or requires another surgical intervention
  4. Minimal invasive cardiac surgery procedures (e.g. minithoracotomy and hemisternotomy)
  5. Thoraco-abdominal surgery, or intraoperative injury to the diaphragm leading to an open connection between the thoracic and abdominal cavity
  6. Participation in any study involving an drug or device
  7. Patient is pregnant or nursing
  8. Inability to understand study information
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    study subjects

    1-arm study

    Device: Haermonics Pure system

Interventions

  • DeviceHaermonics Pure system

    pericardial flushing with Haermonics Pure system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Usability to evaluate user satisfaction and functionality of all use aspects of the Haermonics Pure system within 65 patients by using a user questionnaire.

    For each user, questions will be asked about the common use of the Hearmonics Pure system using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale.

    Time frame: for all users at the end of the study, after enrollment of 65 patients, after approximately 5 months after the start of the study.

  2. Usability to evaluate user satisfaction and functionality of all use aspects of the Haermonics Pure system within 65 patients by using a user questionnaire.

    For each user, questions will be asked about the use of the Hearmonics Pure system in comparison with standard practice, with option 1 Hearmonics Pure system being better, with option 2 no difference, with option 3 standard of care being better.

    Time frame: for all users at the end of the study, after enrollment of 65 patients, after approximately 5 months after the start of the study.

  3. Usability to evaluate user satisfaction and functionality of all use aspects of the Haermonics Pure system within 65 patients by using a user questionnaire.

    For each user, questions will be asked about the common use of the Hearmonics Pure system using the System Usability Scale (SUS). It is comprised of 10 questions that should be answered on a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: for all users at the end of the study, after enrollment of 65 patients, after approximately 5 months after the start of the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety: Rate of device-related events up to discharge

    Descriptive statistics

    Time frame: From enrollment up to discharge or up to 2 weeks after surgery, whichever came first

  2. Usability to evaluate user satisfaction and functionality of all use aspects of the Haermonics Pure system within 65 patients by using a user questionnaire.

    Used by different user groups in different hospital settings when using the different components of the Haermonics Pure system for the different functionalities. User satisfaction is measured with a user questionaire, containing questions with a scale from 1-4, with 1: very unsatisfied, 2: unsatified; 3 satisfied; 4 very satisfied.

    Time frame: For each user at each step for each patient trough study completion, which is expected to be around 3 times a week during approximately 5 months.

  3. Safety: Rate of SAEs up to discharge

    Relationship with the device will be determined for all SAEs. All events of reoperations, pericardiocetesis and pleurcentesis are considered to be SAEs.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to discharge or up to 2 weeks after surgery, whichever came first

  4. Efficacy: Drain fluid output 8 hours after start treatment (with sternum closed).

    Total amount of fluid output, comparing this with the historical control established in the previous FLUID trial.

    Time frame: start treatment (flushing) up to 8 hours after start treatment (flushing).

  5. Technical Efficacy: Number of device deficiencies leading to permanently stopping the treatment for each patient, 65 patients in total

    Device deficiencies will be recorded, including the description of the technical issue.

    Time frame: start treatment (flushing) up to removal of drains, which is typically 12-24 hours after surgery

  6. Efficacy: Occurance of drain occlusion

    Having to permanently stop flushing as a result of retained fluid and no chest tube output. Patients with chest tube output until flushing is terminated and without retention that is not produced after flushing is terminated will by default not have occluded drains. It will be collected how many times the infusion was paused and/ or stopped due to fluid retention for each patient.

    Time frame: start treatment (flushing) up to removal of drains, which is typically 12-24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2025; primary completion for May 2026, 7 months later.

Of 40 interventional studies with no phase under Blood Loss, Surgical, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 16, 2024
First posted
Jul 25, 2024
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 2026
CompletionEst.
May 2026
Last update
Mar 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06521164
Lead sponsor
Haermonics BV
Collaborators
Avania
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 25, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Study contacts

Lian van Lippen
Contact
vanlippen@haermonics.com
0031-625572304
Stuart Head
Contact
head@haermonics.com
0031-645306042

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion