ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06520150Updated Jul 25, 2024

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Regional Anesthesia During S-ICD Implantation Procedure.

An interventional study of Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block and Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution in Chest Pain, Pain, Procedural and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-25.

Sponsored by 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our study consists of a combination of regional blockade ('local' anesthesia) of the anterior and lateral chest wall in the form of a thin needle prick and the supply of local anesthetic drugs to the area of the relevant chest wall structures to exclude all stimuli, including pain from the operative site. A short-acting analgesic and sedative drug will be administered intravenously throughout the procedure - in a dose that allows the required contact between the patient and the anesthetist. If necessary, the dose of the drug may be increased to maintain pain comfort throughout the procedure.

The anesthetic team will be with the patient throughout the procedure to ensure comfort and safety.

Read the detailed description

The current study is a continuation of the 2021-2023 project, during which 16 patients were anesthetized using a combination of previously known regional (PSP +SSAP) blocks in the thoracic area for S-ICD implantation. PSP (pectoserratus plane) block, previously known in scientific nomenclature as (PECS II /DPP/ PNB II) is a block placed under the pectoralis minor muscle between the pectoralis anterior muscle or also under it in the area of the III/IV rib lateral to the midclavicular line. SSAP (superficial serratus anterior plane) block is formerly known as SABP block, which is a block placed at the height of the fifth intercostal in the medial/posterior axillary line between the anterior pterygoid muscle and the dorsal widest muscle.

In some cases, this allowed the procedure to be carried out due to patient burdens, relative contraindications and high risk of complications during general anesthesia. After studies related to the volume of local anesthetics administered as well as the concentration of their mixture, the optimal concentration of the substance used for regional blockade was chosen. This is a mixture of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60mL of administered solution.

Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block (SPIP) formerly known as TTP/ PIP/ PIFP/ SIP/ PSP which is an alternative combination in combination with SSAP is a block in which we deposit a local anesthetic in the parasternal line at the level of the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces between the internal intercostal muscle and the transverse thoracic muscle.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether SPIP+SSAP blockade is the optimal form of anesthesia for S-ICD implantation.

The patient, after qualifying by the cardiologist for S-ICD implantation, will undergo a standard anesthesiological qualification process with evaluation of basic demographic parameters, examination of body mass composition by bioimpedance, comorbidities, medications taken, determination of surgical risk according to the ASA scale ( American Society of Anesthesiology) in addition, the patient will be checked for any contraindications to the use of regional blockade as a method of anesthesia. After qualification, the patient will be asked to read the consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Patients will receive standard premedication in the form of 1g of paracetamol and 150mg of pregabalin orally 30min before the procedure.

The subjects will be randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I will be patients administered PSP+SSAP anesthesia (consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). Group II will be patients given SPIP+SSAP blockade ( consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). It was tentatively planned to conduct the study on a group of 32 patients (16 in each of the two groups).

Anesthesiologists administering anesthesia prior to surgery receive an envelope with a randomly indicated method of anesthesia based on simple randomization determines the type of regional blockade used during the procedure). The subject will not know which study group he or she has been classified into. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anesthesia performed -[randomization by double-blinding]. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed in order to objectivize the extent and quality of the subject's anesthesia, which he will evaluate after the procedure according to a scale of subjective operator comfort created (EOA scale).

During the procedure, i.v. analgesia with the short-acting opioid remifentanil in the dose range of 0.025ug/kg/min to 0.1ug/kg/min will be administered as needed to control pain.

Increasing the dosage of the drug above these doses for pain control will be a disqualifying factor for the patient from further examination and the blockade will be considered ineffective which will be associated with receiving the lowest possible value on the operator's comfort scale. The use of i.v analgesics in the form of ketoprofen 100mg, metamizole 2.5g will also be allowed during the procedure.

During the procedure, the operator will be allowed to additionally administer local anesthesia to the area of the surgical field where severe pain is experienced. Infiltration of the surgical field with a solution of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine in a volume of no more than 40ml will then be performed If it is necessary to exceed the volume of local anesthesia, the patient will be disqualified from further examination. After the procedure, for the purpose of test defibrillation (checking the function of the implanted device), the patient will be put under short-term deeper sedation with propofol at a single dose of 1-3mg/kg/m.c. on one occasion.

During the procedure, in order to assess the patient's pain, NRS(numerical pain scale) or VAS(visual analog scale) scales will be checked every 15min. At the same intervals, the patient's level of sedation will be assessed using the RASS (Richmond agitation/sedation scale) and GCS (Glasgow level of consciousness) scales. Parameters such as SpO2 (hemoglobin oxygen saturation) NIBP( non-invasive blood pressure measurement) or HR (heart rate) will be monitored every 5min.

The NRS check in post-operative care will be done every 6h on the first day, the QoR-15 form (post-operative quality of life and improvement scale) will be given to the patient to fill in 24h after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Pain, Procedural
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Analgesia
  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • ICD

Keywords

  • Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SSAP)
  • Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIP)
  • Pectoserratus Plane Blocks (PSP)
  • Regional anaesthesia
  • Subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD)
  • thorax blockade
  • less invasive
  • implantation
  • pain treatment
03

In context

Chest Pain

388 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 129 across 204 interventional studies indexed under Chest Pain.

Browse Chest Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients aged 18-90 years requiring S-ICD implantation for cardiac indications,
  • high risk of anesthesia ( or higher), patients giving to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • absolute to regional anesthesia such as generalized coagulation disorders, inflammation at the site of anesthesia, allergy to the drugs used for regional anesthesia
  • lack of consent of the patient for the conducted procedure,
  • inability to cooperate with the patient - such as severe mental retardation, unregulated mental illness with motor agitation, advanced neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease/Alzheimer's,
  • inability to give to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group I (PSP+SSAP)

    Group I will include patients undergoing PSP(Pectoserratus plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.

    Procedure: Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block · Drug: Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

  • Active comparator
    Group I (SPIP+SSAP)

    Group II will include patients undergoing SPIP(Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.

    Procedure: Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block · Drug: Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

Interventions

  • ProcedureRegional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block

    Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.

    Also known as: PSP, SPIP, SSAP

  • DrugRopivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

    Drug page: Ropivacaine

    administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NRS

    numerical pain scale 0-10 points

    Time frame: Checked at regular 15-minute intervals during the procedure and every 6 hours for the first 24 hours after the procedure

  2. VAS

    visual analogue scale 0-10 points

    Time frame: Checked at regular 15-minute intervals during the procedure and every 6 hours for the first 24 hours after the procedure

  3. QoR - 15

    post-operative quality of life and improvement scale 0-150 points

    Time frame: Administered to the patient before surgery and 24 hours after surgery

  4. RASS

    Richmond arousal/sedation scale) (-5 \<-\>+5) points

    Time frame: Checked at regular 15 minute intervals during the procedure

  5. GCS

    Glasgow level of consciousness score scales 3-15 points

    Time frame: Checked at regular 15 minute intervals during the procedure

  6. EOA

    Effectiveness of Anaesthesia) -scale (-3 do +3) points

    Time frame: Checked immediately after the procedure (last suture)

Secondary outcomes

  1. SpO2

    hemoglobin oxygen saturation 50-99%

    Time frame: Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure

  2. NIBP

    non-invasive blood pressure measurement of 0-200 millimeters of the mercury column (mmHg)

    Time frame: Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure

  3. HR

    heart rate

    Time frame: Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure

Other outcomes

  1. BMI

    Body mass index 15-45

    Time frame: Before performing procedure

  2. bioimpedance

    volume od lipids 30-80%

    Time frame: beforeperforming procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06520150
Lead sponsor
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
Responsible party
Marek Szamborski (Senior Assistant, MD, 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2024
Start date
Jun 16, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 25, 2024

Study contacts

Marek Szamborski, MD
Contact
mszamborski@4wsk.pl
698448639 ext. +48
Marek Szamborski, MD
principal investigator · Senior Assistant

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ropivacaine

Start the discussion