ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06516354OSAUpdated Oct 4, 2024

Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Using Portable Sleep Testing (PST) Devices on an Inpatient Stroke Unit

An interventional study of Portable sleep apnea screening in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-04.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Why this study was withdrawn
Low enrollment; no patients were enrolled

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2017, registered Feb 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of testing patients for OSA within the inpatient setting. As part of this program, the investigators are proposing early access to a sleep apnea treatment plan, potentially lowering the risk for future stroke symptoms, and preventing lost to follow up of patients for treatment since sleep disordered breathing is primarily considered a disorder that is managed in an outpatient setting.

Hypothesis: Early identification of sleep apnea as a modifiable stroke risk factor (SRF) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients using the STOP BANG questionnaire and portable sleep testing (PST) during inpatient hospitalization, will allow early identification of patients at risk for sleep disordered breathing, early diagnosis of sleep apnea, and earlier prescribed treatment prior to discharge.

Read the detailed description

Currently the standard of care at Lutheran General Hospital for patients does not include a STOP BANG pre-screening assessment, and portable sleep testing (PST) to identify sleep disordered breathing as a risk factor for AIS and TIA. Initially, patients will be asked questions if they have a history of OSA diagnosis, and if ever have been treated with a form of PAP. If the response is no, then the patient will be prescreened using the STOP BANG assessment tool and review of eligibility requirements. If positive STOP BANG and patient meets eligibility, the patient will have the PST device registered and the Watermark ARES 610 will be applied by the sub investigators. The patient will then undergo a portable sleep study which measures nasal pressure, respiratory effort, oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram and body position. If the device needs adjustment during sleep it can be adjusted by patient or Nursing Care Technician. The next morning the PST device, which is removed by sub investigators, will be delivered to the Sleep Laboratory, downloaded by the sleep technician in Sleep Lab, and data transmitted via the hospital network to the sleep specialist (Primary Investigator) for interpretation. If the PST study is interpreted as positive this will initiate a treatment plan by the sleep specialist for prescription of PAP and/or follow up. This patient who is positive will not require an additional polysomnogram for confirmation of the sleep apnea in the outpatient setting. If the result is inconclusive, but highly suspicious, this may require additional outpatient testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,263 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 465 are open to participants now.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,345 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 328 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosis during hospitalization

      • Patient on neurology stroke care unit (10 Tower)
      • Consenting adults (≥ 18 years old)

        o For subjects unable to effectively communicate or sign consent due to stroke symptoms, informed consent will be obtained from LAR (legally authorized representative)

      • Positive STOP BANG screen
      • NIHSS 0-25 (higher NIHSS scores may require application of the PST other than by the patient)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients who receive sedation within 24 hours of portable sleep testing

      • Refusal to sign informed consent
      • Non English speaking patient
      • Inability to designate Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) for consent
      • Participation in other ongoing neurothrombectomy research studies
      • Time from symptom onset to emergency department arrival ˃ 72 hours
      • Respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen at the time of pre screening
      • Cardiac or respiratory arrest within past 3 months
      • Myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 3 months
      • Any unstable medical condition likely to interfere with participation of portable sleep testing
      • Life expectancy less than 6 months
      • Prior known diagnosis of OSA
      • Currently treated with CPAP device
      • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
      • Prisoners
  • Patients unable to complete at least 5 hours of sleep per one night or 8 hours of sleep over 2 nights
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Portable Sleep Apnea Screening

    Application of portable sleep apnea screening device on inpatient stroke/TIA patients for at least 5 hours of sleep in one night or 8 hours of sleep over 2 consecutive nights.

    Device: Portable sleep apnea screening

Interventions

  • DevicePortable sleep apnea screening

    Screening of stroke and TIA patients on the stroke inpatient unit using theSTOP BANG questionnaire and portable sleep testing (PST) during inpatient hospitalization, early interpretation of PST results by neurology with prescribed treatment upon discharge from hospital

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. STOP BANG tool

    Positive screening on STOP BANG tool for sleep disordered breathing completed during inpatient hospitalization prior to discharge.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Portable Sleep Testing

    Positive screening on Portable Sleep Testing (PST) for sleep disordered breathing completed during inpatient hospitalization prior to discharge.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Follow up compliance

    Phone call with patient to assess compliance and tolerability to treatment plan

    Time frame: 120 days

  2. Follow up readmission rate

    Hospital readmission due to stroke from the Crimson database

    Time frame: 120 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chernyshev OY, McCarty DE, Moul DE, Liendo C, Caldito GC, Munjampalli SK, Kelley RE, Chesson AL Jr. A pilot study: portable out-of-center sleep testing as an early sleep apnea screening tool in acute ischemic stroke. Nat Sci Sleep. 2015 Oct 20;7:127-38. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S85780. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26527904 ↗
  • Davis AP, Billings ME, Longstreth WT Jr, Khot SP. Early diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea after stroke: Are we neglecting a modifiable stroke risk factor? Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Jun;3(3):192-201. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e318296f274. PubMed 23914326 ↗
  • Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, Appel LJ, Braun LT, Chaturvedi S, Creager MA, Culebras A, Eckel RH, Hart RG, Hinchey JA, Howard VJ, Jauch EC, Levine SR, Meschia JF, Moore WS, Nixon JV, Pearson TA; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council for High Blood Pressure Research,; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):517-84. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181fcb238. Epub 2010 Dec 2. PubMed 21127304 ↗
  • Johnson KG, Johnson DC. Frequency of sleep apnea in stroke and TIA patients: a meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2010 Apr 15;6(2):131-7. PubMed 20411688 ↗
  • Kauta SR, Keenan BT, Goldberg L, Schwab RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of sleep disordered breathing in hospitalized cardiac patients: a reduction in 30-day hospital readmission rates. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Oct 15;10(10):1051-9. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4096. PubMed 25317084 ↗
  • King S, Cuellar N. Obstructive Sleep Apnea as an Independent Stroke Risk Factor: A Review of the Evidence, Stroke Prevention Guidelines, and Implications for Neuroscience Nursing Practice. J Neurosci Nurs. 2016 Jun;48(3):133-42. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000196. PubMed 27136407 ↗
  • Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O'Connor GT, Resnick HE, Diener-West M, Sanders MH, Wolf PA, Geraghty EM, Ali T, Lebowitz M, Punjabi NM. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul 15;182(2):269-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1746OC. Epub 2010 Mar 25. PubMed 20339144 ↗
  • Aparicio, HJ. Stroke Unit Evaluation of Sleep Apnea: Validating Screening Tools and the Use of a Portable Sleep Study Device. 2016 International Stroke Conference, Los Angeles, CA 17 Feb 2016 Presentation

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2018, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2018
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 28, 2018
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2019
Last update
Oct 4, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06516354
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 4, 2024

Study contacts

Yelena Tumashova, MD
principal investigator · Advocate Medical Group Neurologist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion