ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06515106Updated Jul 23, 2024

Antibody-mediated LGI1 Encephalitis: Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Mechanisms of the Chronic Phase of the Disease

An interventional study of Remote cognitive rehabilitation program in Limbic Encephalitis With LGI1 Antibodies, sponsored by Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2023, registered Mar 2024).
  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The encephalitis mediated by antibodies against Leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein (anti-LGI1 encephalitis) predominantly affects men (M:F, 6:4) and mostly older than 60 years. The disease has two distinct clinical phases: The acute phase in which the majority of patients develop severe short-term memory deficits (unable to remember events or experiences that occurred a few minutes earlier). This memory impairment can be preceded or accompanied by one or more of the following: hyponatremia (60% of patients), a highly distinctive type of seizures called facio-brachial dystonic seizures (\~40% of patients), along with confusion, irritability and other types of focal seizures or less frequently, generalized seizures. In addition, many patients at this stage have symptoms of REM sleep behavior disorder. In this stage, the CSF may show pleocytosis or mild increase of proteins, the EEG is usually abnormal, and in \~60% of the patients the MRI shows typical increased FLAIR signal in medial temporal lobes (11). There is a clinical sub-phenotype (\~13% of patients) in which the disease presents as a rapidly progressive cognitive decline without the indicated FLAIR MRI changes. About 70% of patients improve rapidly with corticosteroids and immunotherapy (eg, intravenous immunoglobulins and/or plasma exchange), but the improvement is often partial. After the acute phase, there is a chronic or residual phase which represents the interval from improvement of initial symptoms until the disease is considered no longer active and the remaining symptoms are thought to be irreversible. This chronic phase may take several months (it has been less well studied), and is characterized by the absence of CSF pleocytosis and inflammatory MRI changes (albeit this may show residual hippocampal atrophy), and very low or undetectable titers of serum antibodies. Most patients are unable to return to their job or previous activities due to residual (irreversible) memory or cognitive deficits accompanied by signs of moderate brain atrophy. In addition, we and others have shown that about 27-35% of patients have relapsing symptoms after improving from the acute phase (. Although acute symptomatic seizures (facio-brachial dystonic and others) occur in \~90% of patients during the acute phase of the disease, less than 10% of patients develop chronic epilepsy often associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Therefore, the prevailing concept on this disease suggests a syndrome and clinical course in which the acute phase shows rapid, albeit partial, response to immunotherapy, and the symptoms of the chronic phase represent a burnout or irreversible process, in which the disease is no longer active, and the potential improvement of remaining symptoms is uncertain.

Here investigators postulate that a better knowledge of this stage will improve treatment decisions and outcome.

In Aim 1, the post-acute stage will be clinically characterized.

In Aim 2, the impact of cognitive rehabilitation will be assessed.

In Aim 3, a mouse model of anti-LGI1 encephalitis will be used to determine the underlying mechanisms and treatment of the postacute stage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Limbic Encephalitis With LGI1 Antibodies

Keywords

  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Encephalitis
  • Autoimmune
  • Cognitive rehabilitation
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Antibody-mediated LGI-1 encephalitis in the post-acute stage of the disease;
  • Patients has been discharged from hospital (acute phase).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to obtain ;
  • Inability to travel to the center.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Antibody-mediated LGI1 encephalitis patients

    Participants of a prospective cohort in post-acute phase of the Antibody-mediated NMDA Receptor Encephalitis that will received a behavioral treatment.

    Behavioral: Remote cognitive rehabilitation program

Interventions

  • BehavioralRemote cognitive rehabilitation program

    Behavioral: Remote cognitive rehabilitation program Remote cognitive rehabilitation program will be performed through an online validated platform (Guttmann NeuroPersonalTrainer: https://gnpt.es/) run by the psychologists team. This is a Sanitary Product with CE certification (Sanitary Product RPS/430/2014; International Patent \[PCT/ES2008/00677\]) and here will be used within its approved indications. The rehabilitation program will increase in difficulty and decrease in frequency during the first year of follow-up (V1-V3).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Age

    Age measured in years

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Gender

    Male or female

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Handedness

    Right- or Left-handed

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. General medical history

    Description of the most important issues compiled in the general medical history of the participant

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Allergies

    List of allergies of each participant

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Symptoms related to anti-LGI1 encephalitis

    Detailed description of symptoms experienced before, during and after the post-acute phase of anti-LGI1 encephalitis.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Treatments

    All treatments in which the participant is being involved.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Functional status

    Functional status according to Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Modified Rankin Scale: - Range: from 0 points (no symptoms) to 6 points (dead).

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Intelligence Quotient

    Estimated through General Ability Index (GAI; from Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV (WAIS-IV). This index is obtained through Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI). Range of GAI: from 40 to 160. Higher is better. Range of VCI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Range of PRI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Verbal working memory

    Verbal Working Memory: Working Memory Index (WMI) from WAIS-IV. - Range of WMI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Phonological loop

    Assessed by Forward order span of Digit span subtest from WAIS-IV. - Range: from 0 to 9 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Visual working memory

    Visual Working Memory: Spatial location subtest from Weschler Memory Scale - IV (WMS-IV). - Range of Spatial Location subtest: from 0 to 32. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Verbal learning

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC - Total learning: range: from 0 to 80. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Proactive interference verbal memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Interference list: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Short-term verbal memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Short-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Long-term verbal memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC): - Long-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Verbal recognition memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC). - Word-list Recognition: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Verbal discrimination memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC) Discrimination index of word-list: False positives + omissions of recognition between 44 total words to recognize. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Verbal retention memory

    Assessed by: Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI) - Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between Short-term memory free recall. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Immediate visual memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Immediate visual memory: range: from 0 to 36. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Delayed visual memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Delayed visual memory: range: from 0 to 12. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Visual retention memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between the Higher punctuation at Trial 2 or 3. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  23. Visual recognition memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Figure Recognition: range: from 0 to 6. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Visual discrimination memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) - Discrimination index: figure recognized minus false positives. Range: from -6 to 6. Higher is better. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  25. Processing speed

    Symbol Search subtest (WAIS-IV) - Total (correct answers less incorrect answers): from 0 to 60 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. TMT-A

    Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A): - Time in seconds: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  27. Naming

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Total correct: from 0 to 60 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Naming with cues

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Total correct with phonemic cue: from 0 to 60

    Time frame: 12 months

  29. Latency in naming

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT) - Time to complete test in seconds

    Time frame: 12 months

  30. Semantic fluency

    Number of name of animals recalled in 1 minute: range: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  31. Phonemic fluency

    Number of words started by letter "M" recalled in 1 minute: - Range: from 0 to infinity. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  32. Visuospatial skills

    Number location subtest of the Visual-Object Spatial and Perceptual battery. - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  33. Symbolic gesture right hand - order

    Symbolic gesture right hand - order subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  34. Symbolic gesture left hand - order

    Symbolic gesture left hand - order subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  35. Symbolic gesture right hand - imitation

    Symbolic gesture right hand - imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  36. Symbolic gesture left hand - imitation

    Symbolic gesture left hand - imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  37. Bilateral ideomotor praxis - imitation

    Bilateral ideomotor praxis imitation subtest from Test Barcelona - Range: from 0 to 10 Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  38. Stroop test - word subtest

    - Words: words read in 45 seconds Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  39. Stroop test - color subtest

    - Colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  40. Stroop test - word-color subtest

    - Word-colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds. Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation \[SD\] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Time frame: 12 months

  41. Prensence of psychiatric symptoms or disorders

    Number of participants with psychiatric symptoms/disorders following DSM-IV-TR guidelines (psychotic symptoms, symptoms of depression, symptoms of mania, global functioning).

    Time frame: 12 months

  42. Sleep microstructure - Total study time

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Total sleep time: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  43. Sleep microstructure - Total sleep time

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Total sleep time: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  44. Sleep microstructure - Sleep efficiency

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Sleep efficiency: based on total study time and total sleep time

    Time frame: 12 months

  45. Sleep microstructure - Time to sleep onset

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time to sleep onset: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  46. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N1

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N1: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  47. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N2

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N2: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  48. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N3

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage N3: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  49. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage R

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Time in stage R: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  50. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N1

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N1: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  51. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N2

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N2: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  52. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N3

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of N3: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  53. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of REM

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - First epoch of REM: minutes

    Time frame: 12 months

  54. Sleep microstructure - REM/NREM time ratio

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - REM/NREM time ratio

    Time frame: 12 months

  55. Sleep microstructure - Number of arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Number of arousals (total)

    Time frame: 12 months

  56. Sleep microstructure - Arousal Index

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Arousal Index

    Time frame: 12 months

  57. Sleep microstructure - Confusional arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Confusional arousals: Yes or No

    Time frame: 12 months

  58. Sleep microstructure - Direct transition from N3 to W

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Direct transition from N3 to W: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

  59. Sleep microstructure - Delta arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Delta arousals: yes, no or unknown

    Time frame: 12 months

  60. Sleep microstructure - Wake after sleep

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (\~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported. Parameters: - Wake after sleep: hour

    Time frame: 12 months

  61. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 6 months

    Percentage of sessions performed in 6 months out of 48 (sessions performed out of 48 x 100)

    Time frame: 6 months

  62. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 9 months

    Percentage of sessions performed in 9 months (sessions performed out of 54 x 100)

    Time frame: 9 months

  63. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 12 months

    Percentage of sessions performed in 9 months out of 60 (sessions performed out of 60 x 100)

    Time frame: 12 months

  64. Cardiovagal evaluation. (Composite autonomic scoring scale)

    Continuous electrocardiogram heart rate changes during deep breathing and postural changes (beats per minute).Composite autonomic scoring scale minimun 0, maximum 3, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  65. Valsava ratio

    Continuous electrocardiogram heart rate changes during Valsalva manoeuvre (ratio).

    Time frame: 12 months

  66. Sympathetic evaluation (Composite autonomic scoring scale)

    Beat-to-beat blood pressure changes to isometric exercise, Valsalva manoeuvre and postural changes, (mmHg). Composite autonomic scoring scale minimun 0, maximum 4, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  67. Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (Compass-31)

    Self-scoring Compass 31 autonomic assessment. Minimum 0, maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  68. Electromyography (EMG)

    Needle recording electrode will be inserted into different muscles (orbicularis oris, extensor indicis propius, tibialis anterior).Presence of abnormal discharges will be recorded (0 none to 4 maximum).

    Time frame: 12 months

  69. Brainstem reflex

    Trigeminal blink reflex, mediated by trigemino-facial ponto-medullary -circuits will be assessed. Surface recording electrodes will be attached over the orbicularis oculi in both sides with active electrode over the middle part of the lower eyelid and the reference at the lateral cantus of the eye . Stimulating electrodes will be placed over the supraorbital nerve. Ipsilateral (R1, R2) and contralateral responses (R2c) latencies measured in ms will be analyzed

    Time frame: 12 months

  70. MRI

    It will be conducted on a 3 Tesla Prisma scanner using a 32-channel head coil. Scanning takes \~50 min including 3D T1-weighted in sagittal plane; T2\*axial EPI; axial diffusion weighted EPI; 3D sagittal FLAIR; resting state functional MRI and glutamate and H2O univoxel spectroscopy in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. There is no contrast used for the MRI scans Outcome for MRI is normal or abnormal. Investigators will review all MRI sequences and determine if the MRI is abnormal and then describe the abnormality or abnormalities seen.

    Time frame: 12 months

  71. EEG: normalcy

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). - Normalcy: yes or no.

    Time frame: 12 months

  72. EEG: time awake

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time awake: percentage

    Time frame: 12 months

  73. EEG: time in drowsiness

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time in drowsiness: percentage

    Time frame: 12 months

  74. EEG: time asleep

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Time asleep: percentage

    Time frame: 12 months

  75. EEG: epileptiform activity

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Epileptiform activity: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

  76. EEG: seizures

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Seizures: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

  77. EEG: slowing

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - EEG slowing: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

  78. EEG: Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

  79. EEG: Changes with hyperventilation

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases). Parameters: - Changes with hyperventilation: yes or no

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. LGI-1 antibodies

    Determined with brain tissue immunohistochemistry and cell - based assays

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. HLA genotyping

    performed by standard techniques based on DNA - PCR and polymorphism identification by reverse hybridization with specific probes and fluorescence labelling of hybridized fragments (PCR - SSOP) (Immucor GTI Diagnostics Inc.Waukesha USA) in combination with genomic DNA sequencing by Sanger methodology (PCRSBT).

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Immune/inflammatory signaling-target gene expression pathways

    RNA/NanoString analysis of targeted gene expression related to activation/function of B cells, T cells, microglia, and other interleukin/ chemokine signaling. Whole blood/CSF will be collected using PAXgene® Blood RNA tubes (Qiagen) shipped to the centers. Total RNA will be extracted using PAXgene® Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen). RNA samples are quantified using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and RNA integrity is determined with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Expression levels of 44 genes related to immunological pathways and cytokines (Annex,Table) will be measured with the nCounter® Digital Analyzer (NanoString), as reported (Armangue et al., Mol Genet Metab 2017;122:134-9). Twenty healthy participants will serve as controls (single evaluation).

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. NfL levels

    determined in serum and CSF using the SiMoA Quanterix technique, as reported (Guasp et al., Neurology 2022;98:e1489 - 98). Age-and sex-matched healthy participants from previous studies will serve as controls.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, Cataluña 08036, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD · Contactjdalmau@clinic.cat · +34 93 227 1738
    • Victor Patricio, MS · Contactvpatricio@recerca.clinic.cat · +34 93 227 1738
    • Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Lorena Rami, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Mar Guasp, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Thais Armanguè, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Amaia Muñoz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Laia Prades, MS · Sub investigator
    • Víctor Patricio, MS · Sub investigator
    • Elianet Fonseca, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):840-851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1708712. No abstract available. PubMed 29490181 ↗
  • Dalmau J, Geis C, Graus F. Autoantibodies to Synaptic Receptors and Neuronal Cell Surface Proteins in Autoimmune Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):839-887. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2016. PubMed 28298428 ↗
  • Hughes EG, Peng X, Gleichman AJ, Lai M, Zhou L, Tsou R, Parsons TD, Lynch DR, Dalmau J, Balice-Gordon RJ. Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 28;30(17):5866-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0167-10.2010. PubMed 20427647 ↗
  • Planaguma J, Leypoldt F, Mannara F, Gutierrez-Cuesta J, Martin-Garcia E, Aguilar E, Titulaer MJ, Petit-Pedrol M, Jain A, Balice-Gordon R, Lakadamyali M, Graus F, Maldonado R, Dalmau J. Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain. 2015 Jan;138(Pt 1):94-109. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu310. Epub 2014 Nov 11. PubMed 25392198 ↗
  • Petit-Pedrol M, Sell J, Planaguma J, Mannara F, Radosevic M, Haselmann H, Ceanga M, Sabater L, Spatola M, Soto D, Gasull X, Dalmau J, Geis C. LGI1 antibodies alter Kv1.1 and AMPA receptors changing synaptic excitability, plasticity and memory. Brain. 2018 Nov 1;141(11):3144-3159. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy253. PubMed 30346486 ↗
  • Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N, Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F, Dalmau J. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PubMed 23290630 ↗
  • Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, Clewley JP, Walsh AL, Morgan D, Cunningham R, Zuckerman M, Mutton KJ, Solomon T, Ward KN, Lunn MP, Irani SR, Vincent A, Brown DW, Crowcroft NS; UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) Aetiology of Encephalitis Study Group. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;10(12):835-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70222-X. Epub 2010 Oct 15. Erratum In: Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;11(2):79. PubMed 20952256 ↗
  • van Sonderen A, Petit-Pedrol M, Dalmau J, Titulaer MJ. The value of LGI1, Caspr2 and voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies in encephalitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 May;13(5):290-301. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.43. Epub 2017 Apr 18. PubMed 28418022 ↗
  • Gable MS, Sheriff H, Dalmau J, Tilley DH, Glaser CA. The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(7):899-904. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1038. Epub 2012 Jan 26. PubMed 22281844 ↗
  • Armangue T, Spatola M, Vlagea A, Mattozzi S, Carceles-Cordon M, Martinez-Heras E, Llufriu S, Muchart J, Erro ME, Abraira L, Moris G, Monros-Gimenez L, Corral-Corral I, Montejo C, Toledo M, Bataller L, Secondi G, Arino H, Martinez-Hernandez E, Juan M, Marcos MA, Alsina L, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Graus F, Dalmau J; Spanish Herpes Simplex Encephalitis Study Group. Frequency, symptoms, risk factors, and outcomes of autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis: a prospective observational study and retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Sep;17(9):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30244-8. Epub 2018 Jul 23. PubMed 30049614 ↗
  • Lai M, Huijbers MG, Lancaster E, Graus F, Bataller L, Balice-Gordon R, Cowell JK, Dalmau J. Investigation of LGI1 as the antigen in limbic encephalitis previously attributed to potassium channels: a case series. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Aug;9(8):776-85. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70137-X. Epub 2010 Jun 28. PubMed 20580615 ↗
  • Irani SR, Alexander S, Waters P, Kleopa KA, Pettingill P, Zuliani L, Peles E, Buckley C, Lang B, Vincent A. Antibodies to Kv1 potassium channel-complex proteins leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein and contactin-associated protein-2 in limbic encephalitis, Morvan's syndrome and acquired neuromyotonia. Brain. 2010 Sep;133(9):2734-48. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq213. Epub 2010 Jul 27. PubMed 20663977 ↗
  • Munoz-Sanchez G, Planaguma J, Naranjo L, Couso R, Sabater L, Guasp M, Martinez-Hernandez E, Graus F, Dalmau J, Ruiz-Garcia R. The diagnosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis varies with the type of immunodetection assay and sample examined. Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1069368. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1069368. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36591253 ↗
  • van Sonderen A, Thijs RD, Coenders EC, Jiskoot LC, Sanchez E, de Bruijn MA, van Coevorden-Hameete MH, Wirtz PW, Schreurs MW, Sillevis Smitt PA, Titulaer MJ. Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: Clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up. Neurology. 2016 Oct 4;87(14):1449-1456. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003173. Epub 2016 Sep 2. PubMed 27590293 ↗
  • Arino H, Armangue T, Petit-Pedrol M, Sabater L, Martinez-Hernandez E, Hara M, Lancaster E, Saiz A, Dalmau J, Graus F. Anti-LGI1-associated cognitive impairment: Presentation and long-term outcome. Neurology. 2016 Aug 23;87(8):759-65. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003009. Epub 2016 Jul 27. PubMed 27466467 ↗
  • Iranzo A, Graus F, Clover L, Morera J, Bruna J, Vilar C, Martinez-Rodriguez JE, Vincent A, Santamaria J. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and potassium channel antibody-associated limbic encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2006 Jan;59(1):178-81. doi: 10.1002/ana.20693. PubMed 16278841 ↗
  • de Bruijn MAAM, van Sonderen A, van Coevorden-Hameete MH, Bastiaansen AEM, Schreurs MWJ, Rouhl RPW, van Donselaar CA, Majoie MHJM, Neuteboom RF, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Thijs RD, Titulaer MJ. Evaluation of seizure treatment in anti-LGI1, anti-NMDAR, and anti-GABABR encephalitis. Neurology. 2019 May 7;92(19):e2185-e2196. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007475. Epub 2019 Apr 12. PubMed 30979857 ↗
  • Ramberger M, Berretta A, Tan JMM, Sun B, Michael S, Yeo T, Theorell J, Bashford-Rogers R, Paneva S, O'Dowd V, Dedi N, Topia S, Griffin R, Ramirez-Franco J, El Far O, Baulac S, Leite MI, Sen A, Jeans A, McMillan D, Marshall D, Anthony D, Lightwood D, Waters P, Irani SR. Distinctive binding properties of human monoclonal LGI1 autoantibodies determine pathogenic mechanisms. Brain. 2020 Jun 1;143(6):1731-1745. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa104. PubMed 32437528 ↗
  • Ohkawa T, Fukata Y, Yamasaki M, Miyazaki T, Yokoi N, Takashima H, Watanabe M, Watanabe O, Fukata M. Autoantibodies to epilepsy-related LGI1 in limbic encephalitis neutralize LGI1-ADAM22 interaction and reduce synaptic AMPA receptors. J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 13;33(46):18161-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3506-13.2013. PubMed 24227725 ↗
  • Guasp M, Rosa-Justicia M, Munoz-Lopetegi A, Martinez-Hernandez E, Armangue T, Sugranyes G, Stein H, Borras R, Prades L, Arino H, Planaguma J, De-La-Serna E, Escudero D, Llufriu S, Sanchez-Valle R, Santamaria J, Compte A, Castro-Fornieles J, Dalmau J; Spanish anti-NMDAR Encephalitis Study Group. Clinical characterisation of patients in the post-acute stage of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a prospective cohort study and comparison with patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):899-910. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00299-X. PubMed 36115362 ↗
  • Irani SR, Stagg CJ, Schott JM, Rosenthal CR, Schneider SA, Pettingill P, Pettingill R, Waters P, Thomas A, Voets NL, Cardoso MJ, Cash DM, Manning EN, Lang B, Smith SJ, Vincent A, Johnson MR. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures: the influence of immunotherapy on seizure control and prevention of cognitive impairment in a broadening phenotype. Brain. 2013 Oct;136(Pt 10):3151-62. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt212. Epub 2013 Sep 6. PubMed 24014519 ↗
  • Diaz Baquero AA, Franco-Martin MA, Parra Vidales E, Toribio-Guzman JM, Bueno-Aguado Y, Martinez Abad F, Perea Bartolome MV, Asl AM, van der Roest HG. The Effectiveness of GRADIOR: A Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Program for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia. Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial After 4 and 12 Months of Treatment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(2):711-727. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215350. PubMed 35124649 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 36 months after the start.

Of 1,442 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cognitive Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,511 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2024
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
StartActual
Dec 18, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06515106
Lead sponsor
Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
Start date
Dec 18, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Josep Dalmau, MD,PhD
Contact
jdalmau@clinic.cat
34 93 227 1738
Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Clínic
Lorena Rami, PhD
principal investigator · Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion