CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06514183Updated Jul 23, 2024

Eumycetoma Long-term Post-Treatment Follow-Up Study

An observational study in Eumycetoma, sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Terminated at 1 site in Sudan. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Due to the socio-political sutuation in Sudan affecting patient follow-up
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the long-term recurrence rate of eumycetoma in clinical trial participants treated in the phase II DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the long-term post treatment follow-up study is to collect data on recurrence of eumycetoma lesions in participants who previously participated in: A randomized, double blind phase II proof-of-concept superiority trial of fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg weekly dose versus itraconazole 400 mg daily, all three arms in combination with surgery, in participants with eumycetoma in Sudan (DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC).

These data will provide additional information on recurrences after end of study (>15 months) of the parent clinical trial (DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC). The study is observational, since there is no intervention in this protocol, but assesses the outcome of the intervention of the parent trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eumycetoma

Keywords

  • Mycetoma
  • Madura foot
  • Madurella mycetomatis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of the clinical trial participants that were recruited in the RCT trial DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC. The RCT had enrolled 104 clinical trial participants with 29 having recurrence before month 15. Therefore, the long-term post-treatment follow-up assessment will target 75 participants that had no recurrence indicated at end of study or who had not completed the study i.e., those who had been regarded as lost to follow up but may now be available.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical trial participants who were previously enrolled and received investigational product (fosravuconazole) or standard of care treatment (itraconazole) in the DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC clinical trial.
  2. In trial DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC had no recurrence of eumycetoma lesion before month 15.
  3. Able and willing to give written informed consent for participation in this study, prior to performance of any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any condition that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or designee, would preclude provision of informed consent or interfere with achieving the study objectives.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • OtherClinical diagnosis of recurrence

    Clinical diagnosis of recurrence

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess recurrence of eumycetoma lesions up to 5 years after end of treatment in participants previously treated with fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg weekly or itraconazole 400 mg daily in study DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC

    Population: Participants in trial DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC who had no recurrence of eumycetoma lesion before month 15 * Treatment: fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg weekly or itraconazole 400 mg daily in study DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC * Variable: Time to recurrence of eumycetoma lesion (if lesion occurred) or time followed-up without lesion

    Time frame: 6 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. To determine efficacy of fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg monotherapy vs. itraconazole monotherapy, after long term post-treatment follow-up

    Population/Treatment/Variable/Intercurrent events: as for primary estimand Hazard ratios comparing a) risk of recurrence for fosravuconazole 200mg vs. itraconazole

    Time frame: 15 months

  2. To assess overall recurrence of eumycetoma lesions up to 5 years in participants treated with fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg weekly or itraconazole 400 mg daily in study DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC

    Population: Participants in trial DNDi-FOSR-04-MYC regardless of recurrence before Month 15. Treatment/Variable/Intercurrent events: as defined for the primary estimand

    Time frame: 6 years

  3. To describe the etiologic pathogen (subtype of fungus) after long term recurrence

    Population: Participants with recurrence of eumycetoma within the current study Summary measure: Proportion of recurrences of each subtype * Treatment: as for primary estimand * Variable: Typing of fungus

    Time frame: 15 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Mycetoma Research Center, Soba University Hospital
    Khartoum, Sudan
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Through Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) and open data sharing platforms. The data may be obtained by sending a request to DNDi

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06514183
Lead sponsor
Drugs for Neglected Diseases
Collaborators
Soba University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
Start date
Jan 26, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2023
Completion
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Borna A Nyaoke, M.D
study director · Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion