ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03086226Updated Jul 18, 2024

Proof-of-Concept Superiority Trial of Fosravuconazole Versus Itraconazole for Eumycetoma in Sudan

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fosravuconazole and Itraconazole in Mycetoma, sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Completed at 1 site in Sudan. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-18.

Sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a single-center, comparative, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, clinical superiority trial of Fosravuconazole versus Itraconazole combined with surgery in subjects with eumycetoma in Sudan.

There will be three arms in this study: The first arm will be Fosravuconazole 300 mg weekly, the second arm will have Fosravuconazole 200 mg weekly and the control arm is the standard treatment using itraconazole 400mg daily.

At 3 months time-point, interim analysis will be done and one of the study arms will be dropped according to the drop-the-loser design, based on efficacy or toxicity.

Read the detailed description

Eumycetoma is a fungal disease caused by Madurella mycetomatis. The disease is chronic, granulomatous and inflammatory. It usually involves subcutaneous tissues and leads to masses and sinuses from which fungal grains are discharged. It is most probably introduced post trauma e.g. thorn prick. It is associated with major morbidity and can be disabling, disfiguring and highly stigmatizing. In advanced cases it may be fatal. Eumycetoma is most prevalent in what is known as mycetoma belt.

Current treatment modalities for eumycetoma are disappointing. The response is characterized by low cure rates, high amputation rates, high up drop out from follow up and high recurrence rates. The available drugs for the treatment of eumycetoma are expensive, potentially toxic and require a long treatment period up to 12 months. By that time the mass is well encapsulated and is removed surgically. Despite prolonged medical treatment, the causative organisms are commonly found to still be viable and can be cultured from the surgical specimen.

The objectives of this study are to determine the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Fosravuconazole versus itraconazole as first-line treatment for subjects with eumycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis. The primary end-point will be complete cure after 12 months treatment as evidenced by clinical assessment showing absence of mycetoma mass with closure of sinuses and absent discharge, normal ultrasonic examination of the lesion, or the presence of fibrosis only associated with a negative fungal culture from a surgical biopsy from the former mycetoma site. The secondary endpoints are the outcome at 3-month's time point based on the same criteria as 12 month and/or treatment-related adverse events at the 3- and 12-month visits. The study will also monitor plasma drug levels of ravuconazole and itraconazole that will be included in a logistic model with other clinical and laboratory parameters to predict outcome. In addition, immunological studies will be done to describe the developing or changing immune responses during treatment. Lastly, all strains collected will be cultured and typed and with assessment of antifungal resistance.

This study is a single-center, comparative, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, clinical superiority trial in subjects with eumycetoma requiring surgery. There will be three arms this study: The first arm will have Fosravuconazole 300 mg weekly and the second arm will have Fosravuconazole 200 mg weekly. Both arms will be evaluated at 3 months. At this time-point, one of the study arms will be dropped according to the drop-the-loser design, based on efficacy or toxicity. The control arm is the standard treatment using itraconazole 400mg daily. Patients will receive treatment for one year. An interim analysis is planned after data has been accumulated for sample size of 28 for 3 months end point.

This study will be done at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Sudan when ethics and regulatory approvals are received. The study plans to recruit 138 subjects by the end of the trial. The main inclusion criteria are subjects who provide consent, aged 18 years or more with primary moderate eumycetoma (size 2-10 cm) caused by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) confirmed Madurella mycetomatis. Females in the child bearing age will require stringent contraception. The main exclusion criteria are eumycetoma > 10 cm, previous treatment, significant concomitant illness that preclude evaluation and treatments or conditions treated with drugs that are known to interact with the azoles.

The study is expected to new safer and more efficacious eumycetoma treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mycetoma

Keywords

  • Mycetoma Fosravuconazole Itraconazole Surgery Sudan
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Drugs for Neglected Diseases is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants with eumycetoma caused by M. mycetomatis confirmed by PCR.
  2. Participants with eumycetoma requiring surgery.
  3. Eumycetoma lesion ≥ 2 cm and \< 16 cm in diameter. Note: A lesion was defined as either one single lesion on one anatomical area or multiple lesions on one anatomical area provided that the total affected area remained within the given limits.
  4. Age ≥ 15 years.
  5. Able to comply with protocol procedures and available for follow-up.
  6. Written from the participant. If the participant was \< 18 years old, there had to be a signed consent from a parent or legal guardian AND a written assent signed by the participant.
  7. Female specific inclusion criteria:

    1. Negative pregnancy test.
    2. If women of (WOCBP), to use adequate during the trial period until 2 months after completion of trial treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Previous surgical or medical treatment for eumycetoma which included any previous antifungal treatment.
  2. Presence of loco-regional lymphatic extension, osteomyelitis, other bone involvement based on radiology or any pre- or co-existing condition that could have precluded evaluation of the eumycetoma. Note: The presence of bone involvement would need a different treatment with a longer duration.
  3. Pregnancy or lactation at screening, or intent to have become pregnant.
  4. Concomitant or severe diseases that could have compromised the participant follow-up or evaluation (e.g., psychiatric condition, chronic hepatitis, neutropenia, (HIV) or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), diabetes mellitus or adrenocortical insufficiency).
  5. Severe malnutrition as defined by a (BMI) \< 16 kg/m2.
  6. to use itraconazole, including congestive heart failure, ventricular dysfunction, ventricular arrhythmia and negative inotropic state; Note: for a comprehensive list of contraindications and contraindicated concomitant medication refer to the package insert for itraconazole (Sporanox®);
  7. Contraindication to the use of fosravuconazole;
  8. Pre-existing liver disease, transaminase levels > 2x the laboratory's (ULN) or elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) or .
  9. Was receiving or likely to have required drugs that were either a substrate for cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4 () and/or metabolised by CYP3A4 (cisapride, oral midazolam, nisoldipine, felodipine, pimozide, quinidine, dofetilide, triazolam, methodone and levacetylmethadol [levomethadyl] were contraindicated);
  10. Fridericia's interval (QTcF) > 450 msec on any known about or taken prior to trial entry.
  11. Familial short QT syndrome or corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation.
  12. History of to any azole antifungal drug.
  13. Participation in other CTs within a 6-month period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fosravuconazole 300 mg

    Given throughout the study for 12 months as the experimental arm. Both experimental arms will be evaluated at 3 months. At this time-point, one of the study arms will be dropped according to the drop-the-loser design, based on efficacy or toxicity.

    Drug: Fosravuconazole

  • Experimental
    Fosravuconazole 200 mg weekly

    Given throughout the study for 12 months as the experimental arm. Both experimental arms will be evaluated at 3 months. At this time-point, one of the study arms will be dropped according to the drop-the-loser design, based on efficacy or toxicity.

    Drug: Fosravuconazole

  • Active comparator
    Itraconazole 400mg daily

    Given throughout the study for 12 months as the comparator arm.

    Drug: Itraconazole

Interventions

  • Fosravuconazole will be given in two arms either as 300mg or 200mg. The drop-the loser design adaptive clinical trial design will allow two stages of the trial separated by a data based decision. In the first stage a decision will be taken on which arm to drop either the Fosravuconazole 200 or the Fosravuconazole 300 arm. The best treatment will be compared against the standard of care, itraconazole. At the end the focus will be comparing the best treatment against standard of care.

    Also known as: E1224

  • This will be the active comparator

    Also known as: Sporanox

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with complete cure at the End-of-Treatment

    Complete cure at the End-of-Treatment (EOT; 52-week time point) in the Modified Intention to Treat (mITT) population. Complete cure of mycetoma is defined as 1. negative fungal culture from a surgical biopsy from the former mycetoma site AND 2. clinical cure (no clinical evidence of mycetoma mass, sinus tract, or discharge) AND 3. normal lesion site or only fibrosis on sonogram

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with complete cure of the Mycetoma at the end of the study

    Complete cure of the mycetoma at the End Of Study (EOS; 15 months) visits Complete cure of mycetoma is defined as 1. negative fungal culture from a surgical biopsy from the former mycetoma site AND 2. clinical cure (no clinical evidence of mycetoma mass, sinus tract, or discharge) AND 3. normal lesion site or only fibrosis on sonogram

    Time frame: 15 months

  2. Proportion of patients with mycological eradication of Mycetoma

    Mycological eradication of the etiologic fungal pathogen from the mycetoma biopsy at the EOT visit (52-week time point). Mycological eradication is defined as negative Mycetoma culture biopsy.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Proportion of patients considered to have effective treatment at the End of Treament

    Effective treatment (combination of mycological eradication AND clinical improvement in the mycetoma lesion) at EOT (52-week time point) visit in the mITT and Clinically Evaluable (CE) Populations. Mycetoma clinical improvement is defined by reduction in mycetoma mass size. Mycological eradication is defined as negative Mycetoma culture biopsy.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Proportion of patients considered to have effective treatment at the End of Study

    Effective treatment (combination of mycological eradication AND clinical improvement in the mycetoma lesion) at EOS (15 months) visit in the mITT and Clinically Evaluable (CE) Populations. Mycetoma clinical improvement is defined by reduction in mycetoma mass size. Mycological eradication is defined as negative Mycetoma culture biopsy.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Propoprtion of patients with complete mycetoma cure by fungus genus at End of Treatment

    Complete cure, effective treatment, and overall improvement categorized by etiologic fungal genus and species at EOT (52-week time point) visits in the mITT and CE populations

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Propoprtion of patients with complete mycetoma cure by fungus genus at End of Study

    Complete cure, effective treatment, and overall improvement categorized by etiologic fungal genus and species at EOS (15 months) visits in the mITT and CE populations

    Time frame: 15 months

  7. Immunological changes

    Immunological parameters indicating a switch from a Th2 to a Th1 response. This includes measurement of cytokines, immunoglobulins and cells

    Time frame: 15 months

  8. Time to complete cure

    The time to onset of cure will be calculate for each subject

    Time frame: 15 months

  9. Time to effective treatment

    The time to effective treatment will be calculate for each subject (combination of mycological eradication and clinical improvement in the mycetoma lesion).

    Time frame: 15 months

  10. Time to failure

    The time to relapse will be calculate for each subject

    Time frame: 15 months

  11. The proportion of subjects experiencing at least one Adverse Event

    The safety consists the description of each serious adverse event and adverse event (preferred term) per treatment group and classified by system organ. ECG and Laboratory abnormalities will be considered as Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 15 months

  12. The frequency of the Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that lead to treatment discontinuation.

    The safety consists the description of each serious adverse event and adverse event (preferred term) per treatment group and classified by system organ. ECG and Laboratory abnormalities will be considered as Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 15 months

  13. Severity of the Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that lead to treatment discontinuation.

    The safety consists the description of each serious adverse event and adverse event (preferred term) per treatment group and classified by system organ. ECG and Laboratory abnormalities will be considered as Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 15 months

  14. CMax

    Derived exposure parameters of ravuconazole and itraconazolecalculated from the final PK model using individual posterior estimates of the PK parameters and from dosing history.

    Time frame: 15 months

  15. AUC at steady-state (AUCss)

    Derived exposure parameters of ravuconazole and itraconazolecalculated from the final PK model using individual posterior estimates of the PK parameters and from dosing history.

    Time frame: 15 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mycetoma Research Centre
    Khartoum, Sudan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Through Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) and open data sharing platforms. The data may be obtained by sending a request to DNDi

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Within 24 months of last subject last visit

Access criteria: Data Requestors will enter into an appropriate agreement or terms of use and will adhere to contractual obligations

Data sharing details ↗ · dndi.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03086226
Lead sponsor
Drugs for Neglected Diseases
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 22, 2017
Start date
May 9, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 10, 2021
Completion
Mar 7, 2022
Last update
Jul 18, 2024

Study contacts

Ahmed Fahal, Prof
principal investigator · Mycetoma Research Centre, Soba University, Khartoum, Sudan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fosravuconazole

Start the discussion