An observational study in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-22.
Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Observational
On the basis of the database established in the previous stage, a cohort analysis was conducted on patients with BDDH complicated by hip arthroscopy for minimally invasive treatment of glenoid and lip injury, according to which the indications of minimally invasive surgery for BDDH patients were optimized and surgical measures were improved. Achieve accurate and rapid repair, rehabilitation and functional recovery, serve national fitness, and treat people's injuries
Based on the work of the previous research group, we prospective constructed a bidirectional cohort of patients with critical hip dysplasia, and summarized the influencing factors for the surgical prognosis of patients with BDDH, so as to continuously optimize patient selection. On this basis, the cohort size was extended to analyze the difference in efficacy between arthroscopic glenolabial repair and glenolabial repair combined with soft tissue enhancement, and further improve the minimally invasive surgery to promote the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in BDDH patients
Diagnosis of borderline hip dysplasia with glenolabial injury. (For example, there are no clinical symptoms of simple critical hip dysplasia, and hip pain may occur when combined with glenolabial injury
Exclusion Criteria:
-
non-intervention
Improved Harris hip score
It is suitable for the evaluation of therapeutic effect of various hip diseases. The Harris score includes pain, function, deformity and range of motion. The lower the improved Harris score, the worse the postoperative effect.
Time frame: Preoperative, 24 months after surgery
PRO rating
Based on Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) : Questionnaires were completed through face-to-face or telephone interviews. Patients' symptoms, function (activity restriction), pain score, quality of life and time to return to activity were evaluated comprehensively. The lower the PRO score, the worse the postoperative effect.
Time frame: Preoperative, 24 months after surgery
Cartilage damage outerbridge grading
The patient underwent hip joint MR Examination at 12 months post-operative follow-up with T2 weighted intrachondral defect and high signal
Time frame: Preoperative, 24 months after surgery
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Peking University Third Hospital