ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06507423SPASMUpdated Apr 2, 2025

Performance of the SeptiCyte LAB Test for Antibiotic Stewardship in Mesenteric Ischemia

An observational study in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia, Sepsis Bacterial and Intra-abdominal Infection, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
15
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 20 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in France — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Intraabdominal Infections · France.

Started
2024
the only one that year
Observational
9 of 20
1 open now
Registered
17th of 20
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 20
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Among the 20 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in France, this one is the only one that started in 2024, is one of 9 observational ones, and was the 17th registered.

Intraabdominal Infections

129 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraabdominal Infections; 15 are open to participants now.

Browse Intraabdominal Infections studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 20 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in France is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 10 Intraabdominal Infections studies recruiting now, 6 (60%) set no upper age limit and 3 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 90 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will help determine whether the SeptiCyte LAB test can accurately differentiate between SIRS and actual infections in postoperative patients, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and improving patient outcomes in cases of acute mesenteric ischemia

Read the detailed description

Introduction Early diagnosis of bacterial infections is crucial in intensive care, as conditions such as sepsis and septic shock are emergencies with high mortality rates. Conversely, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is a deregulated response to an insult without an infectious origin. SIRS is common post-major surgery and complicates the diagnosis between a simple inflammatory response and an actual infection. Although antibiotic therapy is undisputed in septic shock, the rise of antibiotic resistance and the lack of new antibiotics demand a judicious and well-argued prescription in probable sepsis cases. Rapid diagnostics are essential to identify patients who will benefit from empirical antibiotic therapy.

Current Diagnostic Challenges Microbiological documentation remains the gold standard for confirming sepsis or septic shock. However, the delay in obtaining standard bacteriology results poses a risk to patient survival. Biomarkers like CRP and PCT have been proposed for sepsis diagnosis, but their reliability is limited by numerous confounding factors, making them less specific.

The SeptiCyte LAB Test Recent advances in sequencing technology have made molecular biology techniques more accessible and rapid. SeptiCyte LAB is a molecular test based on the quantitative sequencing of mRNA from four genes (CEACAM4, LAMP1, PLA2G7, and PLAC8) involved in bacterial infection signaling. Studies have shown a specificity of 94% and a negative predictive value of 98.8% in ICU patients suspected of sepsis, with a threshold value above 4. These results have also been confirmed in elective esophageal surgery populations, demonstrating encouraging statistical performance.

Relevance to Acute Mesenteric Ischemia (AMI) AMI is a rare and difficult-to-diagnose condition with high diagnostic delays and mortality rates. Its initial presentation often mimics sepsis or septic shock, leading to the early administration of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics due to fears of bacterial translocation or perforation. Although surgical guidelines encourage systemic antibiotic use, there is insufficient evidence for its routine application.

Study Objective While data on the SeptiCyte LAB test is available for cardiac and digestive surgeries, there is none for vascular surgery. This study aims to evaluate the SeptiCyte LAB test's ability to identify postoperative SIRS patients to reduce empirical antibiotic use while awaiting standard bacteriology results and to assess the impact of surgery on the SeptiCyte LAB test. We will study patients admitted to intensive care units pre- and post-open laparotomy for the treatment of embolic or thrombotic AMI.

03

Conditions studied

  • Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
  • Sepsis Bacterial
  • Intra-abdominal Infection
  • Digestive Inflammation

Keywords

  • acute mesenteric schema
  • sepsis
  • septicyte
  • antimicrobial stewardship
  • intra-abdominal infection
  • aortic vascular surgery
  • surgical aortic clamping
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patient with suspected of confirmed acute mesenteric ischemia who required urgent surgery for revascularisation and/or intra-abdominal infection

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged over 18 years
  • Affiliated to health assurance system
  • Hospitalized in the ICU for confirmed mesenteric ischemia* for less than 24 hours with an indication for laparotomy
  • Hospitalized in the ICU for confirmed mesenteric ischemia* who underwent laparotomy for revascularization or digestive resection less than 24 hours ago
  • Intraoperative bacteriological samples and blood cultures performed within 24 hours of medical management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • decline to participate
  • no consent available
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control group

    The control group will consist of adult patients undergoing open vascular surgery for the treatment of an aortic aneurysm. This procedure requires surgical aortic clamping of variable duration, which may lead to potential ischemic events in the digestive system

    Device: Septicyte Lab Test pre operative · Device: Septicyte Lab Test post operative

  • Case

    The "case" group consist of adult patients suffering from acute mesenteric ischemia who required urgent surgery

    Device: Septicyte Lab Test pre operative · Device: Septicyte Lab Test post operative

Interventions

  • DeviceSepticyte Lab Test pre operative

    SeptiCyte® technology uses proprietary biomarker signatures to assess the response of a patient's immune system to infections. It provides a score which can be used to differentiate sepsis from systemic inflammatory response. Each included patient will received the Septicyte LAB test before and after surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia suspicion. The results will be compared to standard of care, retrospectively.

  • DeviceSepticyte Lab Test post operative

    SeptiCyte® technology uses proprietary biomarker signatures to assess the response of a patient's immune system to infections. It provides a score which can be used to differentiate sepsis from systemic inflammatory response. Each included patient will received the Septicyte LAB test before and after surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia suspicion. The results will be compared to standard of care, retrospectively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence or absence of bacterial coinfection during acute mesenteric ischemia

    Septicyte Lab test \< 4 if there is no infection

    Time frame: Day 0 (pre operative)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of Septicyte Lab test to rule out the presence of intra-abdominal infection during acute mesenteric ischemia

    Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value of the Septicyte Lab test

    Time frame: Day 0 (pre operative)

  2. Diagnostic performance of PCT to rule out the presence of intra-abdominal infection during acute mesenteric ischemia

    Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value of the PCT

    Time frame: Day 0 (pre operative)

  3. Diagnostic performance of CRP to rule out the presence of intra-abdominal infection during acute mesenteric ischemia

    Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value of the CRP

    Time frame: Day 0 (pre operative)

  4. Change in Septicyte Lab test during the post-operative period to address the influence of surgery on the response of patient's immune system

    Value of Septicyte Lab test

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHRU de Nancy
    Nancy, Lorraine 54500, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2024 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 1 month.

Of 24 observational studies under Intraabdominal Infections, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 35. This study's 1 month is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2024
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
StartActual
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 1, 2024
Last update
Apr 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06507423
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2024
Completion
Nov 1, 2024
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion