ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06507228PEBBLEUpdated Jul 18, 2024

North West London Pebble Pathway: Automated OSA Diagnosis

An interventional study of NWL PEBBLE STT in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Apnea, sponsored by Patrik Bachtiger. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-18.

Sponsored by Patrik Bachtiger · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2024), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) wait up to two years for a diagnostic test. Early diagnosis enables optimal treatment, mitigating risks including heart failure, lung disease, and stroke. Current diagnostic approaches are expensive (£391), time-consuming (>1-hour interpretation), uncomfortable (cables/tubes/wires), and inequitable (multiple hospital visits). Overcoming all these limitations, we have designed and will investigate a straigh-to-test automated diagnostic pathway for OSA. This will use the AcuPebble, a miniature wearable acoustic sensor and the first regulated technology for automated, at-home diagnosis. The test is cheap (\< £100); time-saving; endorsed by patients, and accessible (posted directly to patients). This project will measure the impact of a potentially transformative, innovative, and scalable diagnostic pathway using AcuPebble technology.

Read the detailed description

The investigators are conducting a prospective implementation and health economic study of a novel straight-to-test (STT) clinical diagnostic pathway for OSA, using a novel, regulatory-approved wearable medical device for automated diagnosis of OSA in the home setting (AcuPebble SA100). The setting is real-world direct clinical care, with participation from three NHS sleep medicine centres servicing the North West London region.

Inclusion criteria is primary care referrals for OSA investigation were triaged onto the pathway based on predetermined criteria, compared to a historical cohort of patients undergoing STT using cardiorespiratory polygraphy (CR-PG) technology serving as a control group. The primary outcome is time-to-diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include NHS cost-saving per patient; surrogates for health equity (e.g. test completion rates, time/cost of journeys saved); and carbon footprint reduction from averted patient journeys (sustainability).

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Sleep Apnea
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,263 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 465 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 53 across 1,490 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Patrik Bachtiger as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • OSA testing referral from primary care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to follow test instructions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    NWL PEBBLE STT patients

    Real-world clinical care arm investigating novel pathway

    Diagnostic Test: NWL PEBBLE STT

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNWL PEBBLE STT

    At home testing for OSA with AcuPebble.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to diagnosis

    Time to diagnosis vs. historical control group

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost saving per test

    Cost saving per test in pounds sterling compared to control group

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Test completion rate

    Completion rate as proxy for health equity

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Financial saving to patients from cutting journeys associated with appointments

    Cost saved from averted journeys by per patient cost of public transport and time taken to travel; informed by mapping journey per patient post-code to sleep study centre.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Sustainability impacts by carbon footprint reduction

    CO2 footprint from averted technologies (reduced plastic waste) and reduced patient journeys (CO2 footprint reduction from miles travelled, calculated using Echochain carbon footprint calculator).

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Time saving to patients from cutting journeys associated with appointments

    Time saved from averted journeys by per patient cost of public transport and time taken to travel; informed by mapping journey per patient post-code to sleep study centre.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Charing Cross Hospital
    London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Devani N, Pramono RXA, Imtiaz SA, Bowyer S, Rodriguez-Villegas E, Mandal S. Accuracy and usability of AcuPebble SA100 for automated diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea in the home environment setting: an evaluation study. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 21;11(12):e046803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046803. PubMed 34933855 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Sharable upon reasonable request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 5 months after the start.

Of 511 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 621 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2024
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
StartActual
Jul 7, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 18, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06507228
Lead sponsor
Patrik Bachtiger
Responsible party
Patrik Bachtiger (NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer, Imperial College London) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
Start date
Jul 7, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 18, 2024

Study contacts

Patrik Bachtiger
Contact
p.bachtiger@imperial.ac.uk
07814396222

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion