ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06483191IMPACTSUpdated May 13, 2025

IMProving Outcomes With ACT After Knee Surgery

An interventional study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Belfast Health and Social Care Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.

Sponsored by Belfast Health and Social Care Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Regarding psychosocial factors and outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most of the current literature and the investigators' previous work suggest that depression, anxiety and pre-operative pain strongly predict worse outcomes following TKA. Despite some conflicting evidence, on the whole, the current literature suggests that psychological intervention in TKA patients could help to improve outcomes. In recent years, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been receiving more attention as it may be more effective than the more traditional cognitive behavioural therapy in treating older people with chronic pain. ACT includes a combination of acceptance and mindfulness methods along with activation and behaviour change methods.

There have been several studies examining ACT in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. These studies have found that attending a pre-operative ACT workshop and receiving text messages reinforcing ACT can reduce use of pain medication, reduce post-operative pain and improve function following surgery. There are also two study protocols published which plan to investigate ACT in TKA patients but the findings of these studies are yet to be reported.

In this feasibility study, the investigators propose to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a pre-operative ACT workshop in TKA patients considered to be at risk of poorer outcome based on a depression score. If found to be acceptable and feasible to both patients and those who will deliver the ACT sessions, a larger study will be performed.

Read the detailed description

Regarding psychosocial factors and outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most of the current literature suggests that depression, anxiety and pre-operative pain strongly predict worse outcomes following TKA. The investigators' previous work agreed with these findings and other psychological factors, such as neuroticism, pain catastrophising and self-blame were associated with worse outcomes up to 1 year following TKA whilst conscientiousness, pain self-efficacy and extraversion were associated with better outcomes up to 1 year following TKA. These psychological factors have been less consistently associated with outcomes following joint arthroplasty in other papers and several papers have found no evidence or conflicting evidence that depression or anxiety are associated with outcomes following TKA. Despite some conflicting evidence, on the whole, the current literature suggests that psychological intervention in TKA patients could help to improve outcomes.

To date, few studies have randomised patients to a psychological intervention or control group to determine whether intervention could improve outcomes following TKA or total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review by Bay et al. (2018) reported that the current literature, which is still in its infancy, does not support routine psychological interventions for TKA or THA. This review included seven studies of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions which involved active patient participation measured with patient reported outcomes in THA or TKA patients. Only two of these studies found psychological interventions to be effective in improving at least one patient reported outcome. One study used a combination of cognitive behaviour therapy and relaxation therapy in THA patients and this was found to significantly improve hip function at 1-year follow-up. In the second study, guided imagery improved gait velocity 6 months after TKA, and reduced knee pain 3 weeks after surgery compared to the control group.

Recently, ACT has been receiving more attention as it may be more effective than the more traditional cognitive behavioural therapy in treating older people with chronic pain. ACT includes a combination of acceptance and mindfulness methods along with activation and behaviour change methods. The goal of ACT is to enhance psychological and behavioural flexibility by cultivating the six inter-rated skills of acceptance, cognitive defusion, present-moment awareness, values clarification, committed action, and perspective taking.

In the current literature, there have been several studies examining ACT in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. One study included 88 veterans who were undergoing orthopaedic surgery (including TKA, THA, shoulder and spine). Half of the patients were randomised to standard care and the other half attended a 1-day ACT workshop pre-operatively in addition to standard care. Pain levels and opioid use were assessed up to 3 months following surgery. The intervention group achieved pain and opioid cessation sooner than those in the control group. Increases in pain acceptance and values-based behaviour, processes targeted in ACT, were related to better outcomes. The other study included 76 patients who underwent operative fixation of a traumatic upper or lower extremity fracture. Patients were randomised to the intervention group, who received twice-daily text messages communicating an ACT-based intervention for the first 2 weeks after surgery, or the control group, who received no text messages. At baseline, patients completed paper forms comprising a basic demographics questionnaire and baseline patient-reported outcomes. Two weeks following surgery, patients again completed the patient reported outcomes and had an opioid medication pill count. On average, the intervention group used 36.5% fewer opioid tablets compared to the control group (intervention group average: 26.1 (SD 21.4) tablets, control group average: 41.1 (SD 22.0) tablets). The intervention group also reported significantly lower post-operative pain compared to the control group. The same group of authors then investigated ACT using the same intervention (text messages sent twice a day for 2 weeks) to a total of 45 THA and TKA patients who had their surgeries delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. They found that the ACT group showed improved function and slowed decline compared to the other 45 in the control group who did not receive any text messages.

There are also two study protocols published which plan to investigate ACT in TKA patients but the findings of these studies are yet to be reported.

Based on the investigators' previous work, psychological factors are associated with TKA outcomes, therefore, in this feasibility study, the investigators propose to examine the acceptability and feasibility of a pre-operative ACT workshop in TKA patients considered to be at risk of poorer outcomes based on a depression score. If found to be acceptable and feasible to both patients and those who will deliver the ACT sessions, a larger study will be performed to determine whether ACT can improve outcomes in TKA patients.

The aim of this feasibility study is to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a half day pre-operative ACT workshop, ACT text messages and follow-up with a physiotherapist in a cohort of patients undergoing TKA who have been identified as having a higher likelihood of a below average post-operative outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 623 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old scheduled for routine primary elective TKA.
  • Participants must have a functional level of spoken and written English and be able to complete the online pre-operative psychosocial questionnaire independently.
  • Patients must have scored 10 or more on the Depression subscale of the (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale) DASS-21 of the pre-operative psychosocial questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who does not have access to a mobile phone to receive the booster text messages, or online facilities to answer online questionnaires.
  • Any patient who has a significant change (≥3 months) in scheduled date of surgery i.e. has a delayed surgery or surgery earlier than expected.
  • Any patient who does not attend the pre-operative education class.
  • Any patient scheduled for revision, uni-compartmental or bilateral TKA.
  • Any patient who has further orthopaedic surgery planned in the next 3 months.
  • Any patient who cannot commit to the schedule of events.
  • Any patient currently receiving any other "talking therapy".
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    Patients will attend a half-day virtual pre-operative ACT group workshop delivered by physiotherapists. Intervention group patients will also receive booster post-operative ACT text messages once a week for 6 weeks and a telephone follow-up with a physiotherapist at 6-8 weeks. The workshop, text messages and follow-up with a physiotherapist will be in addition to standard care.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients in the control group will receive standard care; All patients should attend a 1-hour face-to-face group pre-operative education class. Patients in either group will have access to a helpline where they can speak to a nurse to discuss any problems or concerns. All patients will also receive a follow-up phone call from a nurse within 5 days of discharge to check their progress and will attend a 6-12 week follow-up clinic with their surgeon.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAcceptance and Commitment Therapy

    A half-day pre-operative virtual ACT group workshop, booster post-operative ACT text messages once a week for 6 weeks and a telephone follow-up with a physiotherapist at 6-8 weeks (all in addition to standard care).

    Also known as: ACT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention

    Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed via an online questionnaire to be completed by patients who were randomised to the intervention group. Patients in the control group will also complete a modified set of questions to determine how they felt being randomised to the standard care group and whether they would have liked more support.

    Time frame: 6-8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) from pre-operation to 3 months

    The OKS will be completed by participants online, with a score ranging from 0 (worst score possible) - 48 (best score possible).

    Time frame: Preoperation, 3 months

  2. EuroQol-5D-5L

    The EQ-5D-5L will be completed by participants online. A single score will be derived which ranges from -0.594 to 1, where 0 is death and 1 is full health.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  3. EuroQoL-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D VAS will also be scored from 0 (worst health possible) - 100 (best health possible).

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  4. Pain Interference

    Pain interference will be completed by all patients recruited to the study (following consent and prior to randomisation before attending the pre-operative ACT workshop for the intervention group) and at 3 months post-operatively.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  5. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ)

    The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) will be completed by all patients recruited to the study (following consent and prior to randomisation before attending the pre-operative ACT workshop for the intervention group) and at 3 months post-operatively.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  6. Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-2 (CPAQ-2)

    The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-2 (CPAQ-2) will be completed by all patients recruited to the study (following consent and prior to randomisation before attending the pre-operative ACT workshop for the intervention group) and at 3 months post-operatively.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  7. Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI)

    The Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI) will be completed by all patients recruited to the study (following consent and prior to randomisation before attending the pre-operative ACT workshop for the intervention group) and at 3 months post-operatively.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 3 months

  8. Length of hospital stay

    Total length of hospital stay will be calculated using date of discharge and date of operation.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Post-discharge Non-Scheduled Contact

    This will include inpatient or outpatient physiotherapy sessions, unscheduled face-to-face contact with nurse, orthopaedic surgeon or physiotherapist, phone calls to physiotherapist team, helpline calls, out of hours attendances, A\&E attendances, hospital readmissions and returns to theatre up to 90 days post-operation.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sorel JC, Veltman ES, Honig A, Poolman RW. The influence of preoperative psychological distress on pain and function after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1):7-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0672.R1. PubMed 30601044 ↗
  • Hernandez C, Diaz-Heredia J, Berraquero ML, Crespo P, Loza E, Ruiz Iban MA. Pre-operative Predictive Factors of Post-operative Pain in Patients With Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Reumatol Clin. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):361-80. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Apr 1. English, Spanish. PubMed 25840826 ↗
  • Lewis GN, Rice DA, McNair PJ, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu441. Epub 2014 Dec 26. PubMed 25542191 ↗
  • Alattas SA, Smith T, Bhatti M, Wilson-Nunn D, Donell S. Greater pre-operative anxiety, pain and poorer function predict a worse outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3403-3410. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4314-8. Epub 2016 Oct 12. PubMed 27734110 ↗
  • Lungu E, Vendittoli PA, Desmeules F. Preoperative Determinants of Patient-reported Pain and Physical Function Levels Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Open Orthop J. 2016 Jun 23;10:213-31. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010213. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27398109 ↗
  • Hofstede SN, Gademan MG, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 17;17:212. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1070-3. PubMed 27184266 ↗
  • Lindner M, Nosseir O, Keller-Pliessnig A, Teigelack P, Teufel M, Tagay S. Psychosocial predictors for outcome after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 May 22;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2058-y. PubMed 29788969 ↗
  • Belford K, Gallagher N, Dempster M, Wolfenden M, Hill J, Blaney J, O'Brien S, Smit AM, Botha P, Molloy D, Beverland D. Psychosocial predictors of outcomes up to one year following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1028-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PubMed 32299757 ↗
  • Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;41(4):576-88. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 28. PubMed 22035624 ↗
  • Magklara E, Burton CR, Morrison V. Does self-efficacy influence recovery and well-being in osteoarthritis patients undergoing joint replacement? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):835-46. doi: 10.1177/0269215514527843. Epub 2014 Mar 25. PubMed 24668361 ↗
  • Burns LC, Ritvo SE, Ferguson MK, Clarke H, Seltzer Z, Katz J. Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pain Res. 2015 Jan 5;8:21-32. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S64730. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25609995 ↗
  • Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0963-y. Epub 2009 Jul 8. PubMed 19585177 ↗
  • Riddle DL, Jensen MP, Ang D, Slover J, Perera R, Dumenci L. Do Pain Coping and Pain Beliefs Associate With Outcome Measures Before Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Catastrophize About Pain? A Cross-sectional Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000001. PubMed 29543659 ↗
  • Bletterman AN, de Geest-Vrolijk ME, Vriezekolk JE, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, van Meeteren NL, Hoogeboom TJ. Preoperative psychosocial factors predicting patient's functional recovery after total knee or total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Apr;32(4):512-525. doi: 10.1177/0269215517730669. Epub 2017 Sep 19. PubMed 28922942 ↗
  • Khatib Y, Madan A, Naylor JM, Harris IA. Do Psychological Factors Predict Poor Outcome in Patients Undergoing TKA? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2630-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4234-9. Epub 2015 Mar 20. PubMed 25791440 ↗
  • Bay S, Kuster L, McLean N, Byrnes M, Kuster MS. A systematic review of psychological interventions in total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jun 21;19(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2121-8. PubMed 30037341 ↗
  • Berge DJ, Dolin SJ, Williams AC, Harman R. Pre-operative and post-operative effect of a pain management programme prior to total hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2004 Jul;110(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.002. PubMed 15275749 ↗
  • Jacobson AF, Umberger WA, Palmieri PA, Alexander TS, Myerscough RP, Draucker CB, Steudte-Schmiedgen S, Kirschbaum C. Guided Imagery for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Jul;22(7):563-75. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0038. Epub 2016 May 23. PubMed 27214055 ↗
  • Wetherell JL, Petkus AJ, Alonso-Fernandez M, Bower ES, Steiner AR, Afari N. Age moderates response to acceptance and commitment therapy vs. cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;31(3):302-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.4330. Epub 2015 Jul 28. PubMed 26216753 ↗
  • McCracken LM, Vowles KE. Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):178-87. doi: 10.1037/a0035623. PubMed 24547803 ↗
  • Roddy MK, Boykin DM, Hadlandsmyth K, Marchman JN, Green DM, Buckwalter JA 4th, Garvin L, Zimmerman B, Bae J, Cortesi J, Rodrigues M, Embree J, Rakel BA, Dindo L. One-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop for preventing persistent post-surgical pain and dysfunction in at-risk veterans: A randomized controlled trial protocol. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Nov;138:110250. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110250. Epub 2020 Sep 15. PubMed 32961500 ↗
  • Dindo L, Zimmerman MB, Hadlandsmyth K, StMarie B, Embree J, Marchman J, Tripp-Reimer T, Rakel B. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Postsurgical Pain and Opioid Use in At-Risk Veterans: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study. J Pain. 2018 Oct;19(10):1211-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 17. PubMed 29777950 ↗
  • Anthony CA, Rojas EO, Keffala V, Glass NA, Shah AS, Miller BJ, Hogue M, Willey MC, Karam M, Marsh JL. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Delivered via a Mobile Phone Messaging Robot to Decrease Postoperative Opioid Use in Patients With Orthopedic Trauma: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 29;22(7):e17750. doi: 10.2196/17750. PubMed 32723723 ↗
  • March MK, Harmer A, Godfrey E, Venkatesh S, Thomas B, Dennis S. The KOMPACT-P study: Knee Osteoarthritis Management with Physiotherapy informed by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Pilot study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e032675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032675. PubMed 32499254 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Dec 2026, 15 months later.

Of 1,111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,251 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2024
First posted
Jul 3, 2024
StartEst.
Sep 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
May 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06483191
Lead sponsor
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
Collaborators
Queen's University, Belfast, Trauma and Orthopaedics Research Charity
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2024
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2025

Study contacts

Nicola Gallagher
Contact
nicola.gallagher@belfasttrust.hscni.net
02895043746
Janet Hill
Contact
janet.hill@belfasttrust.hscni.net
02895046799
Richard Napier
principal investigator · Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion